Website Speed Test
One score, real thresholds, and the fixes that actually matter.
How it worksDevice
Nothing has run yet — this test does not start until you press the button. These are the exact thresholds each reading will be judged against, inclusive on the Good side, so an LCP of exactly 2.5 s passes.
| Core Web Vital | Good | Needs improvement | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|
| LCPLargest Contentful Paint | ≤ 2.5 s | 2.5 s – 4.0 s | > 4.0 s |
| INPInteraction to Next Paint | ≤ 200 ms | 200 ms – 500 ms | > 500 ms |
| CLSCumulative Layout Shift | ≤ 0.10 | 0.10 – 0.25 | > 0.25 |
Also measured
- Performance score, 0–100 — Good at 90 and above, Needs improvement from 50 to 89, Poor below 50. A weighted blend of the lab metrics, not a Core Web Vitals verdict.
- FCP and TBT — lab diagnostics. First Contentful Paint is Good ≤ 1.8 s; Total Blocking Time is Good ≤ 200 ms.
- Up to five fixes — the audits Lighthouse estimates would save the most time, largest first.
- Server response time, third-party cost and a resource breakdown — backend latency, which third-party scripts cost the most main-thread time, and where the page's transfer weight actually goes, shown only when Lighthouse's own audits report them.
Ready — nothing runs until you press the buttonNo signup, no stored history — the URL is sent to Google to run the test

