Verified against Claude · 2026-07-28
Turn an approved outline into a brief a freelance writer can execute without back-and-forth
Converts an outline into a concrete content brief that specifies voice, required links, and rejection criteria in checkable terms, instead of vague adjectives a different writer would interpret a different way.
The prompt
Ready to copy — highlighted parts are example details you can swap.
You are turning an approved outline into a content brief for a freelance or contract writer who has not worked with this brand before. The brief's job is to answer every question the writer would otherwise have to ask, so the first draft comes back usable instead of needing a full rewrite. APPROVED OUTLINE H1: The Onboarding Email Sequence That Doubled Our Open Rate. H2s: Why feature-first emails fail, The 4-email sequence we now use, The specific open-rate numbers, What we'd change next. BRAND VOICE NOTES "Direct, no fluff, a little irreverent — think a smart coworker explaining something, not a corporate blog." REQUIRED FACTS OR LINKS Must link to the /email-sequence-builder tool page in the "4-email sequence" section, anchor text should describe the tool, not say "click here". SEO REQUIREMENTS Primary: "onboarding email sequence". Secondary: "welcome email open rate", "email onboarding flow" — primary should appear in H1, first 100 words, and one H2. EXAMPLES OF PAST POSTS THAT WORKED The "Why Your Trial Users Ghost You" post from March — same directness, same short-paragraph rhythm. DEADLINE AND LENGTH 1,500-1,800 words, first draft due in 6 days BRIEF-WRITING RULES State why this post exists and for whom in the first two lines — a writer who understands the actual goal makes better judgment calls on every sentence that follows than one just executing a heading list blind. Translate every voice adjective into something checkable: instead of "friendly, professional tone," specify what that actually means in sentence-level terms — contractions allowed or not, second person or third, how much humor, one real example sentence from a past post that hits the target register. Never leave a brand-voice instruction as an unqualified adjective a different writer could reasonably interpret three different ways; if the brand voice notes given are themselves vague, tighten them using the past-post examples as the actual reference. List every required fact, statistic, or link explicitly with where it should go and why it matters, not just "include relevant internal links" — a writer with no context on the site's link structure cannot make that call correctly, and guessing produces links that don't serve the actual SEO or user-journey goal. State the SEO requirements as specifics — target keyword, one or two secondary keywords, and roughly where each should naturally appear — not as an instruction to "optimize for SEO," which is unactionable without knowing what that means for this specific post. Give a real length range, not an approximate one — "1,500-1,800 words" is checkable, "around 1500ish" invites a draft that comes in at 900 or 2,400 and is technically not wrong. State explicitly what would get a draft sent back for revision — the specific, concrete criteria, not a vague "if it doesn't feel right" — so the writer knows the actual bar before submitting, not after missing it once. OUTPUT FORMAT A complete brief document with these sections in order: Why This Post Exists, Audience, Outline (as given), Voice (with the checkable specifics and one reference example), Required Facts/Links (each with placement), SEO Requirements, Length & Deadline, What Gets a Draft Sent Back.
Customize
Optional — swap in your own details for the highlighted parts above.
Why this works
Translating voice adjectives into checkable sentence-level specifics targets the single most common cause of a freelance draft coming back unusable: "friendly, professional" is a genuinely different instruction to different writers, and a brief that leaves it as an adjective outsources the actual voice decision to whoever's interpreting it that week, which produces inconsistent output across writers even when every individual writer followed the brief in good faith — anchoring to a real past-post example converts an ambiguous instruction into a pattern a writer can actually match against. Specifying required links with exact placement and purpose, rather than a general "include relevant internal links" instruction, matters because link placement decisions require context a new writer structurally doesn't have — which pages the site actually wants to send traffic to, which anchor text serves the SEO goal versus just describing the destination — and asking a writer without that context to "add relevant links" produces links that are relevant in a generic sense but don't serve the specific commercial or SEO purpose the brief-writer actually had in mind. Stating concrete rejection criteria up front, rather than discovering them only when a draft comes back wrong, changes the entire feedback loop's cost: a writer who knows the specific bar before writing can self-check against it, catching problems before submission, while a writer who only learns the bar from a rejected first draft has burned an entire revision cycle finding out information that could have been in the brief from the start — the difference between a one-round and a three-round editorial process on the exact same underlying quality bar. Stating a real length range instead of an approximate one closes a specific and avoidable gap: "around 1500ish" is compatible with both a 900-word draft and a 2,400-word draft, and a writer who hits either extreme has not technically violated the brief, which means the brief itself created the ambiguity the editor now has to resolve after the fact instead of before.
Verified against
Claude Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-07-28
ChatGPT GPT-5.1 · 2026-08-03
Changelog
- 2026-07-28 — Initial publish, verified against Claude (Claude Sonnet 5) and ChatGPT (GPT-5.1).
Need this built into your business?
If a prompt isn't enough — SEO, built and maintained for you — that's Scult's day job.
EXPLORE SEO
