ln-613-code-comments-auditor
Checks inline code documentation quality: WHY-not-WHAT, density, forbidden content, docstrings quality, actuality, legacy cleanup. Use when auditing comments and docstrings.
Works with
---
name: ln-613-code-comments-auditor
description: Checks inline code documentation quality: WHY-not-WHAT, density, forbidden content, docstrings quality, actuality, legacy cleanup. Use when auditing comments and docstrings.
license: MIT
---
> **Paths:** File paths (`references/`, `../ln-*`) are relative to this skill directory.
# Inline Code Documentation Auditor (L3 Worker)
**Type:** L3 Worker
Specialized worker auditing inline code documentation quality: comments, docstrings, and language-specific documentation blocks.
## Purpose & Scope
- Audit inline code documentation for **quality and compliance** across 6 categories
- Universal for any tech stack (auto-detect comment syntax)
- Return structured findings to coordinator with severity, location, recommendations
- Calculate compliance score (X/10) for Inline Code Documentation category
- Scope is limited to comments/docstrings/JSDoc/XML docs
- Out of scope: code design quality, naming quality, test quality, architecture quality, or feature correctness except where comments contradict code
## Inputs
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `references/audit_worker_core_contract.md` and `references/mcp_tool_preferences.md`.
Receives `contextStore` with: `tech_stack`, `project_root`, `output_dir`.
## Workflow
1) **Parse Context:** Extract tech stack, project root, output_dir from contextStore
2) **Scan:** Find all source files (use `tech_stack` for detection)
**Hex-line primary path:** Use `outline(file_path)` and discovery-first `read_file()` for code files before analyzing comments. Use `edit_ready=true, verbosity="full"` only if the audit turns into a follow-up edit. Do not use `hex-graph` here - comment quality is a code-reading problem, not a semantic graph problem.
3) **Extract:** Parse inline comments + docstrings/JSDoc
4) **Audit:** Run 6 category checks (see Audit Categories below)
5) **Collect Findings:** Record each violation with severity, location (file:line), effort estimate (S/M/L), recommendation
6) **Calculate Score:** Count violations by severity, calculate compliance score (X/10)
7) **Write Report:** Build full markdown report per `references/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md`, write to `{output_dir}/ln-613--global.md` in single Write call
8) **Return Summary:** Return minimal summary to coordinator (see Output Format)
## Audit Categories
| # | Category | What to Check |
|---|----------|---------------|
| 1 | **WHY not WHAT** | Comments explain rationale, not obvious code behavior; no restating code |
| 2 | **Density (15-20%)** | Comment-to-code ratio within range; not over/under-commented |
| 3 | **No Forbidden Content** | No dates/authors; no historical notes; no code examples in comments |
| 4 | **Docstrings Quality** | Match function signatures; parameters documented; return types accurate |
| 5 | **Actuality** | Comments match code behavior; no stale references; examples runnable |
| 6 | **Legacy Cleanup** | No TODO without context; no commented-out code; no unsupported notes |
## Scoring Algorithm
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `references/audit_scoring.md`.
## Output Format
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `references/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md`.
Write JSON summary per `references/audit_summary_contract.md`. In managed mode the caller passes both `runId` and `summaryArtifactPath`; in standalone mode the worker generates its own run-scoped artifact path per shared contract.
Write report to `{output_dir}/ln-613--global.md` with `category: "Inline Code Documentation"` and checks: why_not_what, density, forbidden_content, docstrings_quality, actuality, legacy_cleanup.
Return summary per `references/audit_summary_contract.md`.
When `summaryArtifactPath` is absent, write the standalone runtime summary under `.hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/evaluation-worker/{worker}--{identifier}.json` and optionally echo the same summary in structured output.
```
Report written: .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report/ln-613--global.md
Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:N)
```
**Severity mapping:**
| Issue Type | Severity |
|------------|----------|
| Author names, dates in comments | CRITICAL |
| Commented-out code blocks | HIGH |
| Stale/outdated comments | HIGH |
| Obvious WHAT comments | MEDIUM |
| Density deviation >5% | MEDIUM |
| Minor density deviation | LOW |
## Critical Rules
Apply the already-loaded `references/audit_worker_core_contract.md`.
- **Do not auto-fix:** Report violations only; coordinator aggregates for user
- **Fix code, not rules:** NEVER modify rules files (*_rules.md, *_standards.md) to make violations pass
- **Code is truth:** When comment contradicts code, flag the documentation for update; do not turn this into a general code-quality review
- **WHY > WHAT:** Comments explaining obvious behavior should be removed
- **Universal:** Works with any language; detect comment syntax automatically
- **Location precision:** Always include `file:line` for programmatic navigation
## Definition of Done
Apply the already-loaded `references/audit_worker_core_contract.md`.
- [ ] contextStore parsed successfully (including output_dir)
- [ ] All source files scanned (tech stack from contextStore)
- [ ] All 6 categories audited
- [ ] Findings collected with severity, location, effort, recommendation
- [ ] Score calculated using penalty algorithm
- [ ] Report written to `{output_dir}/ln-613--global.md` (atomic single Write call)
- [ ] Summary written per contract
## Reference Files
- Comment rules and patterns: [references/comments_rules.md](references/comments_rules.md)
---
**Version:** 4.0.0
**Last Updated:** 2026-03-01More Writing & Documentation skills
paper-context-resolver
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Paper Context helper for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use only when the README and repository files leave a narrow reproduction-critical gap and the task is to resolve a specific paper detail such as dataset split, preprocessing, evaluation protocol, checkpoint mapping, or runtime assumption from primary paper sources while recording conflicts. Do not use for general paper summary, repo scanning, environment setup, command execution, title-only paper lookup, or replacing README guidance by default.
repo-intake-and-plan
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Intake helper for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to scan a repository, read the README and common project files, extract documented commands, classify inference, evaluation, and training candidates, and return the smallest trustworthy reproduction plan to the main orchestrator. Do not use for environment setup, asset download, command execution, final reporting, paper lookup, or end-to-end orchestration.
minimal-run-and-audit
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.

