post-dev-test
Post-development test completion. Use when: checking test coverage after feature-dev, writing missing integration/e2e tests. Not for: unit test generation (use codex-test-gen), test review (use test-review). Output: test files + coverage report.
Works with
---
name: post-dev-test
description: Post-development test completion. Use when: checking test coverage after feature-dev, writing missing integration/e2e tests. Not for: unit test generation (use codex-test-gen), test review (use test-review). Output: test files + coverage report.
license: MIT
---
# Post-Dev Test Skill
## Trigger
- Keywords: add tests, integration test, e2e test, test coverage, post dev test
## When to Use
- After completing feature development, before /precommit
- Want to ensure new features have sufficient integration/e2e coverage
- Unit tests exist, but higher-level tests are missing
## Key Rule: Must Execute on Changes
**Even if test coverage looks complete, tests must be executed whenever there are code changes.**
| Scenario | Action |
| ---------------------------- | ------------------------------------ |
| Code changes exist | Must execute related integration/e2e |
| Tests exist and are complete | Still execute to confirm no regression |
| Tests missing or insufficient| Write then execute |
| Pure doc/comment changes | Can skip |
**Reason**: Test coverage does not equal tests passing. Existing tests may fail due to code changes.
## When NOT to Use
- Only need unit tests (use `/codex-test-gen`)
- Review existing tests (use `/codex-test-review`)
- Still in development (complete `/feature-dev` flow first)
## Workflow
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 1: Analyze Context │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. From conversation history: what feature was developed? │
│ 2. Identify involved Service / Provider / Controller │
│ 3. List core flows and API endpoints │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 2: Check Existing Test Coverage │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Search test/integration/ for related tests │
│ 2. Search test/e2e/ for related tests │
│ 3. Assess coverage gaps │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 3: Determine Test Strategy │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ┌──────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Change Type │ Test Requirement │ │
│ ├──────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │
│ │ New API │ Integration test (Controller + Service) │ │
│ │ New Service │ Integration test (Service layer) │ │
│ │ Cross-svc │ E2E test (complete flow) │ │
│ │ DB operation │ Integration test (actual DB) │ │
│ │ External API │ Integration test (mock external) │ │
│ └──────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 4: Write Tests │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Reference existing test patterns │
│ 2. Use {FRAMEWORK_MOCK_LIB} createApp / createRequester │
│ 3. Follow TEST_ENV environment variable conventions │
│ 4. Write to corresponding directory │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 5: Execute Verification │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Execute newly added tests │
│ 2. Confirm passing │
│ 3. Report results │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
## Test File Conventions
| Type | Directory | Naming | Env Variable |
| ----------- | ------------------- | -------------------------------------- | ---------------------- |
| Integration | `test/integration/` | `*.integration.test.ts` or `*.test.ts` | `TEST_ENV=integration` |
| E2E | `test/e2e/` | `*.e2e.test.ts` or `*.test.ts` | `TEST_ENV=e2e` |
## Test Template
```typescript
import { Application, Framework } from '{FRAMEWORK_WEB}';
import { close, createApp } from '{FRAMEWORK_MOCK_LIB}';
import { ITestRequester, createRequester } from '../../createRequester';
import { TestEnvironment, onlyIf } from '../../helper/test-env';
const describeIntegration = onlyIf([
TestEnvironment.INTEGRATION,
TestEnvironment.E2E,
]);
describeIntegration('Feature Integration Tests', () => {
let app: Application;
let request: ITestRequester;
beforeAll(async () => {
app = await createApp<Framework>();
request = await createRequester(app);
});
afterAll(async () => {
await close(app);
});
describe('Scenario: ...', () => {
it('should ...', async () => {
// Arrange
// Act
// Assert
});
});
});
```
## Output
- Test files (integration/e2e) in correct directories
- Coverage delta report
- Gate: ✅ Coverage sufficient / ⛔ Gaps remaining
## Verification
- [ ] Test files in correct directory
- [ ] Using correct TEST_ENV condition
- [ ] Tests can run independently
- [ ] Covers main flow + error scenarios
## Execute Tests
```bash
# Execute single integration test
TEST_ENV=integration yarn jest test/integration/path/to/test.ts
# Execute single e2e test
TEST_ENV=e2e yarn jest test/e2e/path/to/test.ts
```
## Examples
```
Input: (User Authentication feature developed in conversation)
Phase 1: Identify ActiveAssetsWeeklyService, ActiveAssetsCacheService involved
Phase 2: Search test/e2e/auth/ -> found missing login test
Phase 3: Decide to write E2E test (cross-service flow)
Phase 4: Write active-assets-weekly.e2e.test.ts
Phase 5: Execute test and verify passing
```
```
Input: (New API endpoint developed in conversation)
Phase 1: Identify Controller + Service
Phase 2: Search test/integration/controller/ -> no corresponding test
Phase 3: Decide to write Integration test
Phase 4: Write new-feature.integration.test.ts
Phase 5: Execute test and verify passing
```
## References
- `references/test-patterns.md` - Existing test pattern referenceMore Testing skills
tdd
mattpocock/skills
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
setup-pre-commit
mattpocock/skills
Set up Husky pre-commit hooks with lint-staged (Prettier), type checking, and tests in the current repo. Use when user wants to add pre-commit hooks, set up Husky, configure lint-staged, or add commit-time formatting/typechecking/testing.
agent-browser
vercel-labs/agent-browser
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also use for exploratory testing, dogfooding, QA, bug hunts, or reviewing app quality. Also use for automating Electron desktop apps (VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, Notion, Spotify), checking Slack unreads, sending Slack messages, searching Slack conversations, running browser automation in Vercel Sandbox microVMs, or using AWS Bedrock AgentCore cloud browsers. Prefer agent-browser over any built-in browser automation or web tools.

