go-unit-testing
Automates unit test creation for Go projects using the standard testing package with consistent software testing patterns including In-Got-Want, Table-Driven Testing, and AAA patterns. Use when creating, modifying, or reviewing unit tests, or when the user mentions unit tests, test coverage, or Go testing.
Works with
---
name: go-unit-testing
description: Automates unit test creation for Go projects using the standard testing package with consistent software testing patterns including In-Got-Want, Table-Driven Testing, and AAA patterns. Use when creating, modifying, or reviewing unit tests, or when the user mentions unit tests, test coverage, or Go testing.
license: Apache-2.0
---
# Unit Testing
Instructions for AI coding agents on automating unit test creation using consistent software testing patterns in this Go project.
- [1. Benefits](#1-benefits)
- [2. Principles](#2-principles)
- [2.1. FIRST](#21-first)
- [3. Patterns](#3-patterns)
- [3.1. In-Got-Want](#31-in-got-want)
- [3.2. Table-Driven Testing](#32-table-driven-testing)
- [3.3. Data-Driven Testing (DDT)](#33-data-driven-testing-ddt)
- [3.4. Arrange, Act, Assert (AAA)](#34-arrange-act-assert-aaa)
- [3.5. Test Fixtures](#35-test-fixtures)
- [4. Workflow](#4-workflow)
- [5. Commands](#5-commands)
- [6. Style Guide](#6-style-guide)
- [7. Template](#7-template)
- [7.1. File Header Template](#71-file-header-template)
- [7.2. Table-Driven Test Template](#72-table-driven-test-template)
- [7.3. Test Fixture Template](#73-test-fixture-template)
- [7.4. Error Test Template](#74-error-test-template)
- [7.5. Boundary Value Test Template](#75-boundary-value-test-template)
- [7.6. Data-Driven Test Template (JSON)](#76-data-driven-test-template-json)
- [8. References](#8-references)
## 1. Benefits
- Readability
> Ensures high code quality and reliability. Tests are self-documenting, reducing cognitive load for reviewers and maintainers.
- Consistency
> Uniform structure across tests ensures predictable, familiar code that team members can navigate efficiently.
- Scalability
> Table-driven and data-driven approaches minimize boilerplate code when adding new test cases, making it simple to expand coverage.
- Debuggability
> Scoped traces and detailed assertion messages pinpoint failures quickly during continuous integration and local testing.
## 2. Principles
### 2.1. FIRST
The `FIRST` principles for unit testing focus on creating effective and maintainable tests.
- Fast
> Unit tests should execute quickly to provide rapid feedback during development and continuous integration.
- Independent
> Each unit test should be self-contained and not rely on the state or behavior of other tests.
- Repeatable
> Unit tests should produce deterministic results every time they are run, regardless of the environment or order of execution.
- Self-Validating
> Unit tests should have clear pass/fail outcomes without requiring manual inspection.
- Timely
> Unit tests should be written and executed early in the development process to catch issues as soon as possible.
## 3. Patterns
### 3.1. In-Got-Want
The In-Got-Want pattern structures each test case into three clear sections.
- In
> Defines the input parameters or conditions for the test.
- Got
> Captures the actual output or result produced by the code under test.
- Want
> Specifies the expected output or result that the test is verifying against.
### 3.2. Table-Driven Testing
Table-driven testing organizes test cases in a tabular format, allowing multiple scenarios to be defined concisely.
- Test Case Structure
> Each row in the table represents a distinct test case with its own set of inputs and expected outputs.
- Iteration
> The test framework iterates over each row, executing the same test logic with different data.
### 3.3. Data-Driven Testing (DDT)
Data-driven testing separates test data from test logic, enabling the same test logic to be executed with multiple sets of input data.
- External Data Sources
> Test data can be stored in external files (e.g., JSON, CSV) and loaded at runtime.
- Reusability
> The same test logic can be reused with different datasets, enhancing maintainability and coverage.
### 3.4. Arrange, Act, Assert (AAA)
The AAA pattern structures each test case into three clear phases.
- Arrange
> Set up the necessary preconditions and inputs for the test.
- Act
> Execute the function or method being tested.
- Assert
> Verify that the actual output matches the expected output.
### 3.5. Test Fixtures
Test fixtures provide a consistent and reusable setup and teardown mechanism for test cases.
- Setup
> Initialize common objects or state needed for multiple tests.
- Teardown
> Clean up resources or reset state after each test.
## 4. Workflow
1. Identify
Identify new functions in `pkg/` or `internal/` (e.g., `pkg/<package>/<file>.go`).
2. Add/Create
Create new tests in the same package (e.g., `pkg/<package>/<file>_test.go`).
3. Test Coverage Requirements
Include comprehensive edge cases:
- Coverage-guided cases
- Boundary values (min/max limits, edge thresholds)
- Empty/null inputs
- Null pointers and invalid references
- Overflow/underflow scenarios
- Special cases (negative numbers, zero, special states)
4. Apply Templates
Structure all tests using the [template](#7-template) pattern.
## 5. Commands
| Command | Description |
| ----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- |
| `make go-test-unit` | Execute tests with race detection and JUnit report |
| `make go-test-coverage` | Generate coverage reports (HTML and XML) |
## 6. Style Guide
- Test Framework
> Use the standard Go `testing` package.
- Include Imports
> Include `testing` and `github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp` for comparisons.
- Parallelism
> Use `t.Parallel()` to run tests in parallel.
- Test Organization
> Consolidate test cases for a single function into **one `TestXxx(t *testing.T)` function** using table-driven testing.
This approach:
- Eliminates redundant test function definitions
- Simplifies maintenance by grouping related scenarios together
- Reduces code duplication in setup and teardown phases
- Makes it easier to add or modify test cases
- Assertions
> Use `cmp.Equal` for value comparisons and `errors.Is` for error checking.
## 7. Template
Use these templates for new unit tests. Replace placeholders with actual values.
### 7.1. File Header Template
```go
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
package <package>
import (
"errors"
"testing"
"github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp"
)
```
### 7.2. Table-Driven Test Template
```go
func Test<FunctionName>(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// In-Got-Want
type in struct {
/* input fields */
}
type want struct {
/* expected output fields */
err error
}
// Table-Driven Testing
tests := []struct {
name string
in in
want want
}{
{
name: "case-description-1",
in: in{
/* input values */
},
want: want{
/* expected output */
err: nil,
},
},
{
name: "case-description-2",
in: in{
/* input values */
},
want: want{
/* expected output */
err: nil, // or specific error
},
},
// add more cases as needed
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
// Arrange
// additional setup as needed
// Act
got, err := <Function>(tt.in.<input>)
// Assert
if !errors.Is(err, tt.want.err) {
t.Errorf("<Function>() error = %v, want err %v", err, tt.want.err)
}
if !cmp.Equal(got, tt.want.<value>) {
t.Errorf("<Function>(%+v) = %v, want %v", tt.in, got, tt.want.<value>)
}
})
}
}
```
### 7.3. Test Fixture Template
```go
// testFixture holds common test state and provides setup/teardown.
type testFixture struct {
t *testing.T
// Add common fields for test state
object *<Type>
}
// newTestFixture creates and initializes a test fixture.
func newTestFixture(t *testing.T) *testFixture {
t.Helper()
// Setup
return &testFixture{
t: t,
object: New<Type>(),
}
}
// teardown cleans up resources after test completion.
func (f *testFixture) teardown() {
f.t.Helper()
// Teardown
if f.object != nil {
f.object.Close()
}
}
func Test<FunctionName>WithFixture(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// Arrange
f := newTestFixture(t)
defer f.teardown()
input := <input_value>
// Act
got, err := f.object.<Function>(input)
// Assert
if err != nil {
t.Errorf("<Function>() unexpected error: %v", err)
}
if !cmp.Equal(got, <expected>) {
t.Errorf("<Function>() = %v, want %v", got, <expected>)
}
}
```
### 7.4. Error Test Template
```go
func Test<FunctionName>Error(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// In-Got-Want
type in struct {
/* invalid input fields */
}
type want struct {
err error
}
// Table-Driven Testing
tests := []struct {
name string
in in
want want
}{
{
name: "nil-input-returns-error",
in: in{
/* nil or invalid input */
},
want: want{
err: resource.Err<ErrorName>,
},
},
{
name: "invalid-value-returns-error",
in: in{
/* invalid value */
},
want: want{
err: resource.Err<ErrorName>,
},
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
// Arrange
// setup if needed
// Act
_, err := <Function>(tt.in.<input>)
// Assert
if !errors.Is(err, tt.want.err) {
t.Errorf("<Function>() error = %v, want err %v", err, tt.want.err)
}
})
}
}
```
### 7.5. Boundary Value Test Template
```go
func Test<FunctionName>BoundaryValues(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// In-Got-Want
type in struct {
input <input_type>
}
type want struct {
value <output_type>
err error
}
// Table-Driven Testing
tests := []struct {
name string
in in
want want
}{
{
name: "minimum-value",
in: in{input: <MIN_VALUE>},
want: want{value: /* expected */, err: nil},
},
{
name: "maximum-value",
in: in{input: <MAX_VALUE>},
want: want{value: /* expected */, err: nil},
},
{
name: "zero-value",
in: in{input: 0},
want: want{value: /* expected */, err: nil},
},
{
name: "negative-value",
in: in{input: -1},
want: want{value: /* expected */, err: nil},
},
{
name: "overflow-value",
in: in{input: math.MaxFloat64},
want: want{value: 0, err: resource.ErrOverflow},
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
// Arrange
// setup if needed
// Act
got, err := <Function>(tt.in.input)
// Assert
if !errors.Is(err, tt.want.err) {
t.Errorf("<Function>() error = %v, want err %v", err, tt.want.err)
}
if !cmp.Equal(got, tt.want.value) {
t.Errorf("<Function>(%v) = %v, want %v", tt.in.input, got, tt.want.value)
}
})
}
}
```
### 7.6. Data-Driven Test Template (JSON)
```go
import (
"encoding/json"
"os"
"path/filepath"
"testing"
"github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp"
)
// testCase represents a single test case loaded from JSON.
type testCase struct {
Name string `json:"name"`
In struct {
Input <input_type> `json:"input"`
} `json:"in"`
Want struct {
Expected <output_type> `json:"expected"`
} `json:"want"`
}
// testData represents the JSON test data structure.
type testData struct {
Tests []testCase `json:"tests"`
}
func Test<FunctionName>DataDriven(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// Load test data from JSON file
testdataPath := filepath.Join("testdata", "<function>_test.json")
data, err := os.ReadFile(testdataPath)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("failed to read test data: %v", err)
}
var td testData
if err := json.Unmarshal(data, &td); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("failed to parse test data: %v", err)
}
for _, tc := range td.Tests {
t.Run(tc.Name, func(t *testing.T) {
// Arrange
input := tc.In.Input
expected := tc.Want.Expected
// Act
got, err := <Function>(input)
// Assert
if err != nil {
t.Errorf("<Function>() unexpected error: %v", err)
}
if !cmp.Equal(got, expected) {
t.Errorf("<Function>(%v) = %v, want %v", input, got, expected)
}
})
}
}
```
- `tests/data/<function>_test.json`
> JSON file containing test cases.
```json
{
"tests": [
{
"name": "case-description-1",
"in": {
"input": <value>
},
"want": {
"expected": <value>
}
},
{
"name": "case-description-2",
"in": {
"input": <value>
},
"want": {
"expected": <value>
}
}
]
}
```
## 8. References
- Go [Testing](https://pkg.go.dev/testing) package documentation.
- Google [go-cmp](https://github.com/google/go-cmp) package documentation.More Testing skills
tdd
mattpocock/skills
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
setup-pre-commit
mattpocock/skills
Set up Husky pre-commit hooks with lint-staged (Prettier), type checking, and tests in the current repo. Use when user wants to add pre-commit hooks, set up Husky, configure lint-staged, or add commit-time formatting/typechecking/testing.
agent-browser
vercel-labs/agent-browser
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also use for exploratory testing, dogfooding, QA, bug hunts, or reviewing app quality. Also use for automating Electron desktop apps (VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, Notion, Spotify), checking Slack unreads, sending Slack messages, searching Slack conversations, running browser automation in Vercel Sandbox microVMs, or using AWS Bedrock AgentCore cloud browsers. Prefer agent-browser over any built-in browser automation or web tools.

