tdd-rust
TDD workflow for RTK filter development. Red-Green-Refactor with Rust idioms. Real fixtures, token savings assertions, snapshot tests with insta. Auto-triggers on new filter implementation.
Tech stack
Works with
---
name: tdd-rust
description: TDD workflow for RTK filter development. Red-Green-Refactor with Rust idioms. Real fixtures, token savings assertions, snapshot tests with insta. Auto-triggers on new filter implementation.
license: Apache-2.0
---
# RTK TDD Workflow
Enforce Red-Green-Refactor for all RTK filter development.
## The Loop
```
1. RED — Write failing test with real fixture
2. GREEN — Implement minimum code to pass
3. REFACTOR — Clean up, verify still passing
4. SAVINGS — Verify ≥60% token reduction
5. SNAPSHOT — Lock output format with insta
```
## Step 1: Real Fixture First
Never write synthetic test data. Capture real command output:
```bash
# Capture real output from the actual command
git log -20 > tests/fixtures/git_log_raw.txt
cargo test 2>&1 > tests/fixtures/cargo_test_raw.txt
cargo clippy 2>&1 > tests/fixtures/cargo_clippy_raw.txt
gh pr view 42 > tests/fixtures/gh_pr_view_raw.txt
# For commands with ANSI codes — capture as-is
script -q /dev/null cargo test 2>&1 > tests/fixtures/cargo_test_ansi_raw.txt
```
Fixture naming: `tests/fixtures/<command>_raw.txt`
## Step 2: Write the Test (Red)
```rust
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
use insta::assert_snapshot;
fn count_tokens(s: &str) -> usize {
s.split_whitespace().count()
}
// Test 1: Output format (snapshot)
#[test]
fn test_filter_output_format() {
let input = include_str!("../tests/fixtures/mycmd_raw.txt");
let output = filter_mycmd(input).expect("filter should not fail");
assert_snapshot!(output);
}
// Test 2: Token savings ≥60%
#[test]
fn test_token_savings() {
let input = include_str!("../tests/fixtures/mycmd_raw.txt");
let output = filter_mycmd(input).expect("filter should not fail");
let input_tokens = count_tokens(input);
let output_tokens = count_tokens(&output);
let savings = 100.0 * (1.0 - output_tokens as f64 / input_tokens as f64);
assert!(
savings >= 60.0,
"Expected ≥60% token savings, got {:.1}% ({} → {} tokens)",
savings, input_tokens, output_tokens
);
}
// Test 3: Edge cases
#[test]
fn test_empty_input() {
let result = filter_mycmd("");
assert!(result.is_ok());
// Empty input = empty output OR passthrough, never panic
}
#[test]
fn test_malformed_input() {
let result = filter_mycmd("not valid command output\nrandom text\n");
// Must not panic — either filter best-effort or return input unchanged
assert!(result.is_ok());
}
}
```
Run: `cargo test` → should fail (function doesn't exist yet).
## Step 3: Minimum Implementation (Green)
```rust
// src/mycmd_cmd.rs
use anyhow::{Context, Result};
use regex::Regex;
use std::sync::LazyLock;
static ERROR_RE: LazyLock<Regex> =
LazyLock::new(|| Regex::new(r"^error").unwrap());
pub fn filter_mycmd(input: &str) -> Result<String> {
if input.is_empty() {
return Ok(String::new());
}
let filtered: Vec<&str> = input.lines()
.filter(|line| ERROR_RE.is_match(line))
.collect();
Ok(filtered.join("\n"))
}
```
Run: `cargo test` → green.
## Step 4: Accept Snapshot
```bash
# First run creates the snapshot
cargo test test_filter_output_format
# Review what was captured
cargo insta review
# Press 'a' to accept
# Snapshot saved to src/snapshots/mycmd_cmd__tests__test_filter_output_format.snap
```
## Step 5: Wire to main.rs (Integration)
```rust
// src/main.rs
mod mycmd_cmd;
#[derive(Subcommand)]
pub enum Commands {
// ... existing commands ...
Mycmd(MycmdArgs),
}
// In match:
Commands::Mycmd(args) => mycmd_cmd::run(args),
```
```rust
// src/mycmd_cmd.rs — add run() function
pub fn run(args: MycmdArgs) -> Result<()> {
let output = execute_command("mycmd", &args.to_vec())
.context("Failed to execute mycmd")?;
let filtered = filter_mycmd(&output.stdout)
.unwrap_or_else(|e| {
eprintln!("rtk: filter warning: {}", e);
output.stdout.clone()
});
tracking::record("mycmd", &output.stdout, &filtered)?;
print!("{}", filtered);
if !output.status.success() {
std::process::exit(output.status.code().unwrap_or(1));
}
Ok(())
}
```
## Step 6: Quality Gate
```bash
cargo fmt --all && cargo clippy --all-targets && cargo test
```
All 3 must pass. Zero clippy warnings.
## Arrange-Act-Assert Pattern
```rust
#[test]
fn test_filters_only_errors() {
// Arrange
let input = "info: starting build\nerror[E0001]: undefined\nwarning: unused\n";
// Act
let output = filter_mycmd(input).expect("should succeed");
// Assert
assert!(output.contains("error[E0001]"), "Should keep error lines");
assert!(!output.contains("info:"), "Should drop info lines");
assert!(!output.contains("warning:"), "Should drop warning lines");
}
```
## RTK-Specific Test Patterns
### Test ANSI stripping
```rust
#[test]
fn test_strips_ansi_codes() {
let input = "\x1b[32mSuccess\x1b[0m\n\x1b[31merror: failed\x1b[0m\n";
let output = filter_mycmd(input).expect("should succeed");
assert!(!output.contains("\x1b["), "ANSI codes should be stripped");
assert!(output.contains("error: failed"), "Content should be preserved");
}
```
### Test fallback behavior
```rust
#[test]
fn test_filter_handles_unexpected_format() {
// Give it something completely unexpected
let input = "completely unexpected\x00binary\xff data";
// Should not panic — returns Ok() with either empty or passthrough
let result = filter_mycmd(input);
assert!(result.is_ok(), "Filter must not panic on unexpected input");
}
```
### Test savings at multiple sizes
```rust
#[test]
fn test_savings_large_output() {
// 1000-line fixture → must still hit ≥60%
let large_input: String = (0..1000)
.map(|i| format!("info: processing item {}\n", i))
.collect();
let output = filter_mycmd(&large_input).expect("should succeed");
let savings = 100.0 * (1.0 - count_tokens(&output) as f64 / count_tokens(&large_input) as f64);
assert!(savings >= 60.0, "Large output savings: {:.1}%", savings);
}
```
## What "Done" Looks Like
Checklist before moving on:
- [ ] `tests/fixtures/<cmd>_raw.txt` — real command output
- [ ] `filter_<cmd>()` function returns `Result<String>`
- [ ] Snapshot test passes and accepted via `cargo insta review`
- [ ] Token savings test: ≥60% verified
- [ ] Empty input test: no panic
- [ ] Malformed input test: no panic
- [ ] `run()` function with fallback pattern
- [ ] Registered in `main.rs` Commands enum
- [ ] `cargo fmt --all && cargo clippy --all-targets && cargo test` — all green
## Never Do This
```rust
// ❌ Synthetic fixture data
let input = "fake error: something went wrong"; // Not real cargo output
// ❌ Missing savings test
#[test]
fn test_filter() {
let output = filter_mycmd(input);
assert!(!output.is_empty()); // No savings verification
}
// ❌ unwrap() in production code
let filtered = filter_mycmd(input).unwrap(); // Panic in prod
// ❌ Regex inside the filter function
fn filter_mycmd(input: &str) -> Result<String> {
let re = Regex::new(r"^error").unwrap(); // Recompiles every call
...
}
```More Refactoring skills
vercel-react-best-practices
vercel-labs/agent-skills
React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.
analyze-project
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit read-only skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when the user wants to read and understand a repository, inspect model structure and training or inference entrypoints, review configs and insertion points, or flag suspicious implementation patterns without modifying code or running heavy jobs. Do not use for active command execution, broad refactoring, speculative code adaptation, or automatic bug fixing.
request-refactor-plan
mattpocock/skills
Create a detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via user interview, then file it as a GitHub issue. Use when user wants to plan a refactor, create a refactoring RFC, or break a refactor into safe incremental steps.

