python-guidelines
This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring Python code. Covers code integration, idiomatic patterns, docstring formatting, anti-abstraction rules, and software engineering basics.
Works with
Agent Skills format with YAML frontmatter. Claude Code reads it as-is.
---
name: "python-guidelines"
description: "This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring Python code. Covers code integration, idiomatic patterns, docstring formatting, anti-abstraction rules, and software engineering basics."
license: "Apache-2.0"
---
# Python Guidelines
**Integrate into existing code. Don't append to it.**
> Simple is better than complex. Flat is better than nested.
> Errors should never pass silently. Unless explicitly silenced.
> If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.
>
> -- The Zen of Python (PEP 20)
## Code Philosophy
- Match existing naming, importing, and signature patterns. Use existing utilities and data structures.
- Functions have a single purpose. Don't hardcode behavior that makes them less general.
- No trivial wrappers for 2 lines or less. Inline it.
- Inline single-use variables at the usage site.
- No try/except unless critical. Let errors surface.
- No duplicate code.
- Functions handle their own input validation. No if-else checks in main.
- Use pathlib, not os.path.
- Consider API and time costs for MongoDB/Gemini/OpenAI/Claude/Voyage.
Don't do this:
```python
# Generate comment report only if requested
if include_comments:
comment_report = generate_comments_report(start_date, end_date, team, verbose)
else:
comment_report = ""
print(" Skipping comment analysis (disabled)")
```
Do this:
```python
comment_report = generate_comments_report(start_date, end_date, team, verbose) if include_comments else ""
```
Ask yourself: "Am I adding code, or integrating into what exists?"
## Simplicity Over Abstraction
**YAGNI: You Aren't Gonna Need It.**
Don't build for hypothetical future requirements. Add complexity only when the current task demands it.
Avoid:
- Abstract base classes for a single implementation
- Configuration options nobody asked for
- Error handling for impossible scenarios
- Wrapper classes around a single function
- Dependency injection when direct calls work
- Generic type parameters for one concrete type
Three similar lines of code is better than a premature abstraction. Refactor when the third real use case appears, not before.
But simplicity does not mean chaos. Always maintain:
- Clear function names that describe what they do
- Logical grouping of related code into modules
- Consistent naming conventions across the project
- Clean separation between I/O and logic
- Explicit parameters over global state or side effects
Ask yourself: "Is this abstraction solving a problem I have right now, or one I'm imagining?"
## Environment
- **Package manager**: uv (NOT pip)
- **Virtual env**: `source .venv/bin/activate` or `uv run python -c "..."`
- **3rd party packages**: Find source with `python -c "import pkg; print(pkg.__file__)"`, then Read.
## Testing Discipline
Never assume anything. Run `python -c "..."` to verify hypotheses about code behavior, package functions, or data structures before suggesting a plan or exiting plan mode.
Ask yourself: "Did I verify this with `python -c` before building on it?"
## Google-Style Docstrings
- **Summary**: Imperative mood ("Calculate", not "Calculates")
- **Args**: All parameters with types and descriptions. No default values. Indent 4 spaces.
- **Types**: `int | str` unions, uppercase shapes `(N, M)`, lowercase builtins `list`/`dict`/`tuple`, capitalize `Any`/`Path`
- **Optional**: `name (type, optional): Description`
- **Returns**: Always `(type)` in parentheses. Never tuple types. Separate named values for multiple returns.
- **Sections**: Examples (>>>), Notes, References (plaintext only). Section titles at 0 indent.
- **Omit**: "Returns:" if nothing returned, "Args:" if no args, "Raises:" unless critical
- **Classes**: Attributes section only, omit Methods/Args. Don't convert single-line to multiline.
- **`__init__`**: Args only. No Examples/Notes/Methods/References.
- **Tests**: Single-line docstrings only.
- Erase default values from existing arg descriptions. Optionally include minimal Examples.
Ask yourself: "Would a new developer understand this function from the docstring alone?"
## Reference Files
Read the matching file before you write the code, not after:
- [`references/idiomatic-patterns.md`](references/idiomatic-patterns.md) -- read when writing loops, comprehensions, unpacking, context managers, or dataclasses. 18 idioms with before/after code
- [`references/zen-of-python.md`](references/zen-of-python.md) -- read when choosing between two designs or judging whether an abstraction earns its place. PEP 20 with annotations
- [`references/google-style-guide.md`](references/google-style-guide.md) -- read when deciding on exceptions, mutable defaults, import style, naming, or comments
- [`references/effective-python-tips.md`](references/effective-python-tips.md) -- read when reviewing or refactoring existing code. Key tips from "Effective Python" (Brett Slatkin)More Refactoring skills
vercel-react-best-practices
vercel-labs/agent-skills
React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.
analyze-project
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit read-only skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when the user wants to read and understand a repository, inspect model structure and training or inference entrypoints, review configs and insertion points, or flag suspicious implementation patterns without modifying code or running heavy jobs. Do not use for active command execution, broad refactoring, speculative code adaptation, or automatic bug fixing.
request-refactor-plan
mattpocock/skills
Create a detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via user interview, then file it as a GitHub issue. Use when user wants to plan a refactor, create a refactoring RFC, or break a refactor into safe incremental steps.

