legacy-code-safety

Trigger: legacy code safety, safe refactor. Make untested code safe to change.

andresnator/agents-orchestrator2 installsApache-2.0Synced Aug 22

Works with

Claude CodeCursorCodex CLIGitHub CopilotGemini CLI

Agent Skills format with YAML frontmatter. Claude Code reads it as-is.

---
name: "legacy-code-safety"
description: "Trigger: legacy code safety, safe refactor. Make untested code safe to change."
license: "Apache-2.0"
---

# Legacy Code Safety
Legacy code is code without a sufficient test safety net. The goal is not to make it beautiful first; the goal is to make it safe to change.

## Principles

- Capture current behavior before refactoring.
- Treat current observable behavior as the contract until explicitly changed.
- Search for seams before structural changes.
- Break dependencies minimally to enable characterization tests.
- Refactor incrementally in small, reversible steps.
- Separate behavior-preserving refactor from functional change.
- Validate after every step.
- Protect public contracts.
- Document rollback before implementation begins.

## Legacy Code Change Algorithm

Every safe change to legacy code follows the same pipeline: (1) identify change points, (2) find test points, (3) break dependencies, (4) write characterization tests, (5) change and refactor. Plans over legacy code should make these five steps recognizable in their task ordering.

## Cover & Modify

Cover & Modify, never Edit & Pray: no plan step modifies code that is not covered by tests (the "software vise"). If coverage is not affordable, the step shrinks until it is, or it moves behind a hardening task.

## Cheap impact mapping

Lean on the compiler: in statically typed code, deliberately changing a signature or type makes the compiler enumerate every use site — a free impact map when call hierarchies are unclear.

## Sprout and Wrap (routing note)

Sprout Method/Class (grow new, tested code called from the untested flow) and Wrap Method/Class (add behavior before or after the untested code) are mitigation routes for delivering NEW logic when putting the class under test is not affordable yet. They add behavior, so they never appear as tasks in a behavior-preserving refactor bundle: in refactor plans they are recorded only as follow-up/Scope Out routing hints toward `/deep-plan` or sdd execution. Decision rule where they do apply: sprout for new logic inside the flow, wrap for behavior before/after it; escalate to the class variant when the original cannot be instantiated.

More Refactoring skills

← All Refactoring skills

Check your AI visibility

One URL in, a 0–100 score and the exact fixes out.

RUN THE CHECK

Browse all the tools

15 tools across six categories
13 of them never send your data anywhere

Free · No signup · No trial clock

SEE THE DIRECTORY