commit-smart
Analyze staged/unstaged changes and create semantic conventional commits with context about WHY, not just WHAT. Auto-detects commit type and scope from the diff. Supports optional type/scope arguments. Usage - /commit-smart, /commit-smart fix, /commit-smart refactor api
Works with
Agent Skills format with YAML frontmatter. Claude Code reads it as-is.
---
name: "commit-smart"
description: "Analyze staged/unstaged changes and create semantic conventional commits with context about WHY, not just WHAT. Auto-detects commit type and scope from the diff. Supports optional type/scope arguments. Usage - /commit-smart, /commit-smart fix, /commit-smart refactor api"
license: "MIT"
---
# Smart Commit
Create meaningful conventional commits by analyzing your actual changes.
## Workflow
### Step 1: Assess the working tree
Run these commands to understand the current state:
```bash
git status
git diff --stat
git diff --cached --stat
```
### Step 2: Handle unstaged changes
If nothing is staged (`git diff --cached` is empty):
1. Show the user what files have changed
2. Suggest what to stage based on logical grouping (e.g., "these 3 files are all related to the auth refactor")
3. Ask if they want to stage all, or select specific files
4. Stage the approved files with `git add <files>`
If changes are already staged, proceed to analysis.
### Step 3: Analyze the diff
Read the full staged diff:
```bash
git diff --cached
```
Determine the commit type from the changes:
| Signal | Type |
|--------|------|
| New files with new functionality | `feat` |
| New test files or test additions | `test` |
| Changes to existing logic fixing incorrect behavior | `fix` |
| Structural changes without behavior change | `refactor` |
| package.json, tsconfig, CI config changes | `chore` |
| Build/bundler config changes | `build` |
| README, docs, comments only | `docs` |
| Formatting, whitespace, semicolons only | `style` |
| Performance improvements | `perf` |
Determine the scope from the primary directory or module affected:
- `src/api/` -> `api`
- `src/components/auth/` -> `auth`
- `tests/` -> `tests`
- Root config files -> omit scope
- Multiple unrelated areas -> omit scope
### Step 4: Check for user overrides
If the user provided arguments via `$ARGUMENTS`:
- Single word (e.g., `fix`) -> use as commit type
- Two words (e.g., `refactor api`) -> use as type and scope
- Otherwise -> use auto-detected values
### Step 5: Compose the commit message
Format: `type(scope): imperative short description`
Rules:
- Subject line max 72 characters
- Use imperative mood ("add", "fix", "refactor", not "added", "fixes")
- Don't end with a period
- Body explains **WHY** this change was made, not what changed (the diff shows what)
- If changes are trivial (typo fix, formatting), skip the body
Example:
```
feat(auth): add JWT refresh token rotation
Tokens were expiring mid-session for users with slow connections.
Rotating refresh tokens extends the session without compromising
security, since each refresh token can only be used once.
```
### Step 6: Confirm and commit
Show the user the proposed commit message and ask for confirmation.
If confirmed, run:
```bash
git commit -m "<message>"
```
Then verify with:
```bash
git log --oneline -1
```
Show the committed hash and message.
## Tips
- Run after completing a logical unit of work, not after every file change
- If the diff is too large for one commit, suggest splitting into multiple commits
- For breaking changes, add `!` after the scope: `feat(api)!: change response format`
- The body should answer "if someone reads this commit in 6 months, will they understand WHY?"More Refactoring skills
vercel-react-best-practices
vercel-labs/agent-skills
React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.
analyze-project
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit read-only skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when the user wants to read and understand a repository, inspect model structure and training or inference entrypoints, review configs and insertion points, or flag suspicious implementation patterns without modifying code or running heavy jobs. Do not use for active command execution, broad refactoring, speculative code adaptation, or automatic bug fixing.
request-refactor-plan
mattpocock/skills
Create a detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via user interview, then file it as a GitHub issue. Use when user wants to plan a refactor, create a refactoring RFC, or break a refactor into safe incremental steps.

