agent-workflow-designer
Design production-grade multi-agent workflows with clear pattern choice (sequential, parallel, hierarchical), handoff contracts, failure handling, and cost/context controls. Use when architecting a multi-step agent pipeline, choosing between single-agent vs multi-agent approaches, or refactoring an LLM workflow that suffers from context bloat or unreliable handoffs.
Works with
--- name: agent-workflow-designer description: Design production-grade multi-agent workflows with clear pattern choice (sequential, parallel, hierarchical), handoff contracts, failure handling, and cost/context controls. Use when architecting a multi-step agent pipeline, choosing between single-agent vs multi-agent approaches, or refactoring an LLM workflow that suffers from context bloat or unreliable handoffs. license: MIT --- # Agent Workflow Designer **Tier:** POWERFUL **Category:** Engineering **Domain:** Multi-Agent Systems / AI Orchestration --- ## Overview Design production-grade multi-agent workflows with clear pattern choice, handoff contracts, failure handling, and cost/context controls. ## Core Capabilities - Workflow pattern selection for multi-step agent systems - Skeleton config generation for fast workflow bootstrapping - Context and cost discipline across long-running flows - Error recovery and retry strategy scaffolding - Documentation pointers for operational pattern tradeoffs --- ## When to Use - A single prompt is insufficient for task complexity - You need specialist agents with explicit boundaries - You want deterministic workflow structure before implementation - You need validation loops for quality or safety gates --- ## Quick Start ```bash # Generate a sequential workflow skeleton python3 scripts/workflow_scaffolder.py sequential --name content-pipeline # Generate an orchestrator workflow and save it python3 scripts/workflow_scaffolder.py orchestrator --name incident-triage --output workflows/incident-triage.json ``` --- ## Pattern Map - `sequential`: strict step-by-step dependency chain - `parallel`: fan-out/fan-in for independent subtasks - `router`: dispatch by intent/type with fallback - `orchestrator`: planner coordinates specialists with dependencies - `evaluator`: generator + quality gate loop Detailed templates: `references/workflow-patterns.md` --- ## Recommended Workflow 1. Select pattern based on dependency shape and risk profile. 2. Scaffold config via `scripts/workflow_scaffolder.py`. 3. Define handoff contract fields for every edge. 4. Add retry/timeouts and output validation gates. 5. Dry-run with small context budgets before scaling. --- ## Common Pitfalls - Over-orchestrating tasks solvable by one well-structured prompt - Missing timeout/retry policies for external-model calls - Passing full upstream context instead of targeted artifacts - Ignoring per-step cost accumulation ## Best Practices 1. Start with the smallest pattern that can satisfy requirements. 2. Keep handoff payloads explicit and bounded. 3. Validate intermediate outputs before fan-in synthesis. 4. Enforce budget and timeout limits in every step.
More Refactoring skills
vercel-react-best-practices
vercel-labs/agent-skills
React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.
analyze-project
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Analyze / Rigor Audit read-only skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when the user wants to read and understand a repository, inspect model structure and training or inference entrypoints, review configs and insertion points, or flag suspicious implementation patterns without modifying code or running heavy jobs. Do not use for active command execution, broad refactoring, speculative code adaptation, or automatic bug fixing.
request-refactor-plan
mattpocock/skills
Create a detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via user interview, then file it as a GitHub issue. Use when user wants to plan a refactor, create a refactoring RFC, or break a refactor into safe incremental steps.

