162-java-profiling-analyze
Use when you need to analyze Java profiling data collected during the detection phase — including interpreting flamegraphs, memory allocation patterns, CPU hotspots, threading issues, systematic problem categorization, evidence documentation with profiling-problem-analysis and profiling-solutions markdown files, or prioritizing fixes using Impact/Effort scoring. This should trigger for requests such as Analyze JFR profile; Analyze the profile; Analyze the performance; Analyze the memory; Analyze the threading; Analyze GC logs from profiling; Prioritize Java profiling bottlenecks by impact. Part of Plinth Toolkit
Works with
--- name: 162-java-profiling-analyze description: Use when you need to analyze Java profiling data collected during the detection phase — including interpreting flamegraphs, memory allocation patterns, CPU hotspots, threading issues, systematic problem categorization, evidence documentation with profiling-problem-analysis and profiling-solutions markdown files, or prioritizing fixes using Impact/Effort scoring. This should trigger for requests such as Analyze JFR profile; Analyze the profile; Analyze the performance; Analyze the memory; Analyze the threading; Analyze GC logs from profiling; Prioritize Java profiling bottlenecks by impact. Part of Plinth Toolkit license: Apache-2.0 --- # Java Profiling Workflow / Step 2 / Analyze profiling data Analyze profiling results systematically: inventory results (flamegraphs, JFR, GC logs, thread dumps), identify problems (memory leaks, CPU hotspots, threading issues), document findings using standardized templates (profiling-problem-analysis-YYYYMMDD.md, profiling-solutions-YYYYMMDD.md), prioritize using Impact/Effort scores, and correlate multiple profiling files for validation. **What is covered in this Skill?** - Inventory: scan profiler/results/ for allocation-flamegraph, heatmap-cpu, memory-leak, *.jfr, *.log, *.txt - Problem identification: memory (leaks, excessive allocations, GC pressure), performance (CPU hotspots, blocking), threading (deadlocks, contention, pool saturation) - Documentation: docs/profiling-problem-analysis-YYYYMMDD.md, docs/profiling-solutions-YYYYMMDD.md - Prioritization: Impact (1–5) / Effort (1–5), focus on high priority first - Tools: async-profiler, JFR, JProfiler/YourKit, GCViewer, flamegraphs, heatmaps **Scope:** Validate profiling results represent realistic load scenarios. Cross-reference multiple files. Include quantitative metrics. ## Constraints Validate profiling results represent realistic load before analysis. Document assumptions and limitations. Cross-reference multiple files. - **VALIDATE**: Ensure profiling results represent realistic load scenarios before analysis - **DOCUMENT**: Record assumptions and limitations in analysis reports - **CROSS-REFERENCE**: Use multiple profiling files to validate findings - **BEFORE APPLYING**: Read the reference for problem analysis and solutions templates - **EDGE CASE**: If request scope is ambiguous, stop and ask a clarifying question before applying changes - **EDGE CASE**: If required inputs, files, or tooling are missing, report what is missing and ask whether to proceed with setup guidance ## When to use this skill - Analyze JFR profile - Analyze the profile - Analyze the performance - Analyze the memory - Analyze the threading - Analyze the GC - Analyze the profiling - Prioritize Java profiling bottlenecks by impact - Performance analysis ## Workflow 1. **Read analysis reference and inventory inputs** Read `references/162-java-profiling-analyze.md` and inventory profiling artifacts in `profiler/results/`. 2. **Validate data quality and assumptions** Confirm datasets represent realistic load conditions and record assumptions/limitations before drawing conclusions. 3. **Identify and prioritize bottlenecks** Analyze memory/CPU/threading findings, cross-reference multiple files, and prioritize issues by Impact/Effort. 4. **Document findings and solution options** Create `docs/profiling-problem-analysis-YYYYMMDD.md` and `docs/profiling-solutions-YYYYMMDD.md` with quantitative evidence. ## Reference For detailed guidance, examples, and constraints, see [references/162-java-profiling-analyze.md](references/162-java-profiling-analyze.md).
More Performance skills
seo-audit
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," or "indexing issues." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.
competitor-profiling
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to research, profile, or analyze competitors from their URLs. Also use when the user mentions 'competitor profile,' 'competitor research,' 'competitor analysis,' 'profile this competitor,' 'analyze competitor,' 'competitive intelligence,' 'competitor deep dive,' 'who are my competitors,' 'competitor landscape,' 'competitor dossier,' 'competitive audit,' or 'research these competitors.' Input is a list of competitor URLs. Output is structured competitor profile markdown files. For creating comparison/alternative pages from profiles, see competitors. For sales-specific battle cards, see sales-enablement.
vercel-optimize
vercel-labs/agent-skills
Use for Vercel cost and performance optimization on deployed projects, especially Next.js, SvelteKit, Nuxt, and limited Astro apps. Collect Vercel metrics, usage, project config, and code scan results first; investigate only metric-backed candidates; produce ranked recommendations grounded in verified files and version-aware Vercel/framework docs. Trigger for Vercel bill reduction, slow or expensive routes, caching opportunities, Function Invocations, Build Minutes, Fast Data Transfer, Core Web Vitals, Bot Management, Fluid compute, or cost breakdown requests.

