code-size
Enforce complexity and size limits on Swift code with SwiftLint threshold rules — cyclomatic complexity, function/type/file length, parameter count — adopted via a violations baseline so existing code never blocks. Use when agent-written code needs deterministic size constraints.
Works with
--- name: code-size description: Enforce complexity and size limits on Swift code with SwiftLint threshold rules — cyclomatic complexity, function/type/file length, parameter count — adopted via a violations baseline so existing code never blocks. Use when agent-written code needs deterministic size constraints. license: MIT --- # Code Size & Complexity Limits Complexity is the strongest single predictor of defect density, and code written *by agents* balloons fastest — an agent under pressure adds one more branch to an existing function far more readily than it extracts a new one. These five SwiftLint threshold rules are the deterministic cap: they keep functions small enough that tests can actually cover their branches, and they keep agents from wrangling with their own tangles. ## When This Skill Activates Use this skill when: - Setting up quality gates for a project where agents write most of the code - A review keeps flagging "this function is too long/branchy" by hand - Functions have grown past what their tests plausibly cover - Adopting the deterministic gauntlet (see `testing/fitness-functions/`) ## The Rules The fragment at `rules/swiftlint.yml` configures five built-in SwiftLint rules (all enabled by default in SwiftLint — this fragment sets the thresholds): | Rule | Warning | Error | What it caps | |---|---|---|---| | `cyclomatic_complexity` | 10 | 20 | Independent paths through one function | | `function_body_length` | 50 | 100 | Lines per function body | | `type_body_length` | 300 | 500 | Lines per type body | | `file_length` | 500 | 1000 | Lines per file | | `function_parameter_count` | 5 | 8 | Parameters per function | Merge the fragment into the project's `.swiftlint.yml` (alongside any `opt_in_rules`/`custom_rules` fragments already adopted). ## Brownfield Adoption: Baseline, Never Mass-Refactor Turning these rules on in an existing codebase must not trigger a refactoring spree — bulk rewrites to satisfy a linter are how working code gets broken. Freeze today's violations and gate only *new* ones: ```bash # One-time: record existing violations (SwiftLint 0.55+) swiftlint lint --write-baseline .swiftlint-baseline.json # The gate from then on — fails only on NEW violations swiftlint lint --strict --baseline .swiftlint-baseline.json ``` Commit `.swiftlint-baseline.json`. Shrink it opportunistically: when touching a baselined function for other reasons, fix its violation and regenerate the baseline in the same commit. **Fallback for older SwiftLint** (before 0.55, no baseline support): record the violation count instead — ```bash swiftlint lint --quiet | wc -l > .swiftlint-count # Gate: current count must not exceed the committed count ``` ## When a Rule Fires The fix is structural, not suppressive: - `cyclomatic_complexity` / `function_body_length` → extract the branches into named functions, or replace the branch ladder with a table/enum dispatch - `type_body_length` / `file_length` → split by responsibility (extensions in separate files count separately) - `function_parameter_count` → introduce a parameter struct `// swiftlint:disable` is not a fix. The rare legitimate exemption (a generated file, a big-but-flat data table) belongs in `.swiftlint.yml`'s `excluded:` list with a comment — visible in one place, not scattered through source. ## Common Pitfalls | Pitfall | Problem | Solution | |---------|---------|----------| | Enabling without a baseline | Day-one wall of violations, gate ignored | `--write-baseline` first, gate on new only | | Mass-refactoring to satisfy thresholds | Working code broken for a number | Freeze old violations; fix opportunistically | | Inline `swiftlint:disable` comments | Exemptions scattered and invisible | `excluded:` list in config, with reasons | | Thresholds loosened per-project | Cap quietly stops capping | Change thresholds only with a written reason | ## References - `testing/fitness-functions/` — set/count invariants a per-line rule can't express - `testing/coverage-ratchet/` — the coverage half of the metrics gauntlet - `ios/coding-best-practices/` — iOS-specific lint fragment (style/API rules) - `generators/ci-cd-setup/` — base `.swiftlint.yml` template these fragments merge into
More Mobile skills
animation-vocabulary
emilkowalski/skills
Reverse-lookup glossary that turns a vague description of a web animation or motion effect into its exact term ("the bouncy thing when a popover opens" → Pop in; "the iOS rubber-band scroll" → Rubber-banding). Use when the user asks "what's it called when…", or describes a motion effect without knowing its name and wants the right word to prompt an AI or designer with. For naming an effect, not designing or building one.
xcode-project-setup
firebase/agent-skills
Safely modifies Xcode projects (.pbxproj) to add Swift Packages and link files. Use this skill whenever an iOS project needs dependencies installed (e.g. Firebase, Alamofire).
cross-border-ecommerce
nexscope-ai/ecommerce-skills
Cross-border e-commerce expansion advisor. Scores target markets on 8 weighted dimensions (market size, ecommerce penetration, competition, regulatory complexity, logistics infrastructure, payment ecosystem, cultural distance, IP protection), compares 5 fulfillment models with cost and transit data, provides country-by-country tax/duty compliance guides (EU VAT/IOSS, UK VAT, US sales tax, CA GST, AU GST, JP consumption tax), maps local payment preferences by market, and builds a phased expansion roadmap. No API key required.

