agent-orchestration
Agent orchestration patterns for agentic loops, multi-agent coordination, alternative frameworks, and multi-scenario workflows. Use when building autonomous agent loops, coordinating multiple agents, evaluating CrewAI/AutoGen/Swarm, or orchestrating complex multi-step scenarios.
Works with
---
name: agent-orchestration
description: Agent orchestration patterns for agentic loops, multi-agent coordination, alternative frameworks, and multi-scenario workflows. Use when building autonomous agent loops, coordinating multiple agents, evaluating CrewAI/AutoGen/Swarm, or orchestrating complex multi-step scenarios.
license: MIT
---
# Agent Orchestration
Comprehensive patterns for building and coordinating AI agents -- from single-agent reasoning loops to multi-agent systems and framework selection. Coordination and multi-scenario categories have individual rule files in `rules/` loaded on-demand; loop and framework tutorials live upstream (see [Upstream coverage](#upstream-coverage-do-not-restate)), with house defaults in `references/ork-delta.md`.
> **CC native `/workflows` (2.1.154):** Claude Code now ships *dynamic workflows* — ask Claude to create a workflow and it orchestrates tens-to-hundreds of agents in the background; view runs with `/workflows`. This is **complementary** to the patterns here: use CC `/workflows` for large-scale, fire-and-forget **background** fan-out (you check back later); use the bounded **foreground** Agent Teams / Task-tool patterns below when ≤8 agents must coordinate within a single skill invocation via shared memory (handoff files, mesh messaging). Different scale, not a replacement.
>
> **Ask only when genuinely blocked (CC 2.1.154):** CC now reserves the multiple-choice question prompt for decisions it genuinely cannot make itself, rather than asking when it already has enough context to proceed. When orchestrating agents, don't gate progress on an `AskUserQuestion` the lead can resolve from available context — reserve prompts for true branch points (irreversible actions, missing requirements). This complements ork's voice-friendly decision guidance.
## Quick Reference
| Category | Rules | Impact | When to Use |
|----------|-------|--------|-------------|
| [Agent Loops](#agent-loops) | upstream | HIGH | ReAct reasoning, plan-and-execute, self-correction |
| [Multi-Agent Coordination](#multi-agent-coordination) | 2 | CRITICAL | Supervisor routing, agent debate, result synthesis |
| [Alternative Frameworks](#alternative-frameworks) | upstream | HIGH | CrewAI crews, AutoGen teams, framework comparison |
| [Multi-Scenario](#multi-scenario) | 2 | MEDIUM | Parallel scenario orchestration, difficulty routing |
**Total: 4 rules across 4 categories.** Loop and framework tutorials moved to first-party sources; the rescued house defaults live in `references/ork-delta.md`.
## Quick Start
```python
# ReAct agent loop
async def react_loop(question: str, tools: dict, max_steps: int = 10) -> str:
history = REACT_PROMPT.format(tools=list(tools.keys()), question=question)
for step in range(max_steps):
response = await llm.chat([{"role": "user", "content": history}])
if "Final Answer:" in response.content:
return response.content.split("Final Answer:")[-1].strip()
if "Action:" in response.content:
action = parse_action(response.content)
result = await tools[action.name](*action.args)
history += f"\nObservation: {result}\n"
return "Max steps reached without answer"
```
```python
# Supervisor with fan-out/fan-in
async def multi_agent_analysis(content: str) -> dict:
agents = [("security", security_agent), ("perf", perf_agent)]
tasks = [agent(content) for _, agent in agents]
results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks, return_exceptions=True)
return await synthesize_findings(results)
```
## Agent Loops
Patterns for autonomous LLM reasoning: ReAct (Reasoning + Acting), Plan-and-Execute with replanning, self-correction loops, and sliding-window memory management.
**Key decisions:** Max steps 5-15, temperature 0.3-0.7, memory window 10-20 messages.
## Multi-Agent Coordination
Fan-out/fan-in parallelism, supervisor routing with dependency ordering, conflict resolution (confidence-based or LLM arbitration), result synthesis, and CC Agent Teams (mesh topology for peer messaging in CC 2.1.33+).
**Key decisions:** 3-8 specialists, parallelize independent agents, use Task tool (star) for simple work, Agent Teams (mesh) for cross-cutting concerns.
## Alternative Frameworks
CrewAI hierarchical crews with Flows (1.8+), OpenAI Agents SDK handoffs and guardrails (0.12+), Microsoft Agent Framework (AutoGen + SK merger), GPT-5.2-Codex for long-horizon coding, and AG2 for open-source flexibility.
**Key decisions:** Match framework to team expertise + use case. LangGraph for state machines, CrewAI for role-based teams, OpenAI SDK for handoff workflows, MS Agent for enterprise compliance.
## Multi-Scenario
Orchestrate a single skill across 3 parallel scenarios (simple/medium/complex) with progressive difficulty scaling (1x/3x/8x), milestone synchronization, and cross-scenario result aggregation.
**Key decisions:** Free-running with checkpoints, always 3 scenarios, 1x/3x/8x exponential scaling, 30s/90s/300s time budgets.
## Upstream coverage (do not restate)
Local tutorials for these topics were retired; consult the first-party source and keep only house deltas in `references/ork-delta.md`.
| Topic | First-party source |
|-------|--------------------|
| ReAct / plan-and-execute / self-correction loop implementations | OpenAI function calling guide (https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/function-calling); LangGraph tutorials (context7: /langchain-ai/langgraph) |
| Fan-out coordination, result-synthesis boilerplate, and the generic multi-agent design checklist | Python asyncio docs (https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html); Anthropic "Building effective agents" (https://www.anthropic.com/research/building-effective-agents); `ork:langgraph` supervisor patterns |
| CrewAI (crews, Flows, MCP tools, guardrails) | CrewAI docs (https://docs.crewai.com); context7: /crewaiinc/crewai |
| OpenAI Agents SDK (handoffs, sessions, guardrails, MCP) | https://openai.github.io/openai-agents-python/ ; context7: /openai/openai-agents-python |
| Microsoft Agent Framework / AutoGen (teams, termination, A2A) | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agent-framework/ ; context7: /microsoft/autogen |
| GPT-5.2-Codex capabilities, pricing, IDE integrations | OpenAI model docs (https://platform.openai.com/docs/models) |
| Multi-scenario state machine, architecture and skill-agnostic template deep-dives | Superseded in-skill by `rules/scenario-orchestrator.md` and `rules/scenario-routing.md` |
## References
- `references/ork-delta.md` - House defaults and dated decisions rescued from retired tutorials
- `references/framework-comparison.md` - Condensed framework decision matrix and use-case table
- `references/langgraph-implementation.md` - LangGraph 1.2+ implementation of the multi-scenario orchestrator
- `references/claude-code-instance-management.md` - Running 3 parallel Claude Code instances for scenario demos
## Key Decisions
| Decision | Recommendation |
|----------|----------------|
| Single vs multi-agent | Single for focused tasks, multi for decomposable work |
| Max loop steps | 5-15 (prevent infinite loops) |
| Agent count | 3-8 specialists per workflow |
| Framework | Match to team expertise + use case |
| Topology | Task tool (star) for simple; Agent Teams (mesh) for complex |
| Scenario count | Always 3: simple, medium, complex |
## Common Mistakes
- No step limit in agent loops (infinite loops)
- No memory management (context overflow)
- No error isolation in multi-agent (one failure crashes all)
- Note (CC 2.1.161): parallel *tool calls* now fail independently — a failed Bash no longer cancels siblings in the same batch. This caveat still applies at the agent-orchestration level, not to tool batches; `claude agents` rows now show `done/total` for fanned-out work.
- Note (CC 2.1.157): `claude agents` honors the `agent` field in `settings.json` for dispatched sessions; `--agent <name>` overrides it — pin the agent type explicitly when dispatching.
- Missing synthesis step (raw agent outputs not useful)
- Mixing frameworks in one project (complexity explosion)
- Using Agent Teams for simple sequential work (use Task tool)
- Sequential instead of parallel scenarios (defeats purpose)
## Related Skills
- `ork:langgraph` - LangGraph workflow patterns (supervisor, routing, state)
- `function-calling` - Tool definitions and execution
- `ork:task-dependency-patterns` - Task management with Agent Teams workflow
## Capability Details
### react-loop
**Keywords:** react, reason, act, observe, loop, agent
**Solves:**
- Implement ReAct pattern
- Create reasoning loops
- Build iterative agents
### plan-execute
**Keywords:** plan, execute, replan, multi-step, autonomous
**Solves:**
- Create plan then execute steps
- Implement replanning on failure
- Build goal-oriented agents
### supervisor-coordination
**Keywords:** supervisor, route, coordinate, fan-out, fan-in, parallel
**Solves:**
- Route tasks to specialized agents
- Run agents in parallel
- Aggregate multi-agent results
### agent-debate
**Keywords:** debate, conflict, resolution, arbitration, consensus
**Solves:**
- Resolve agent disagreements
- Implement LLM arbitration
- Handle conflicting outputs
### result-synthesis
**Keywords:** synthesize, combine, aggregate, merge, summary
**Solves:**
- Combine outputs from multiple agents
- Create executive summaries
- Score confidence across findings
### crewai-patterns
**Keywords:** crewai, crew, hierarchical, delegation, role-based, flows
**Solves:**
- Build role-based agent teams
- Implement hierarchical coordination
- Use Flows for event-driven orchestration
### autogen-patterns
**Keywords:** autogen, microsoft, agent framework, teams, enterprise, a2a
**Solves:**
- Build enterprise agent systems
- Use AutoGen/SK merged framework
- Implement A2A protocol
### framework-selection
**Keywords:** choose, compare, framework, decision, which, crewai, autogen, openai
**Solves:**
- Select appropriate framework
- Compare framework capabilities
- Match framework to requirements
### scenario-orchestrator
**Keywords:** scenario, parallel, fan-out, difficulty, progressive, demo
**Solves:**
- Run skill across multiple difficulty levels
- Implement parallel scenario execution
- Aggregate cross-scenario results
### scenario-routing
**Keywords:** route, synchronize, milestone, checkpoint, scaling
**Solves:**
- Route tasks by difficulty level
- Synchronize at milestones
- Scale inputs progressivelyMore Mobile skills
animation-vocabulary
emilkowalski/skills
Reverse-lookup glossary that turns a vague description of a web animation or motion effect into its exact term ("the bouncy thing when a popover opens" → Pop in; "the iOS rubber-band scroll" → Rubber-banding). Use when the user asks "what's it called when…", or describes a motion effect without knowing its name and wants the right word to prompt an AI or designer with. For naming an effect, not designing or building one.
xcode-project-setup
firebase/agent-skills
Safely modifies Xcode projects (.pbxproj) to add Swift Packages and link files. Use this skill whenever an iOS project needs dependencies installed (e.g. Firebase, Alamofire).
cross-border-ecommerce
nexscope-ai/ecommerce-skills
Cross-border e-commerce expansion advisor. Scores target markets on 8 weighted dimensions (market size, ecommerce penetration, competition, regulatory complexity, logistics infrastructure, payment ecosystem, cultural distance, IP protection), compares 5 fulfillment models with cost and transit data, provides country-by-country tax/duty compliance guides (EU VAT/IOSS, UK VAT, US sales tax, CA GST, AU GST, JP consumption tax), maps local payment preferences by market, and builds a phased expansion roadmap. No API key required.

