resolve-git-conflicts
>
Works with
--- name: resolve-git-conflicts description: > license: MIT --- # Resolve Git Conflicts Identify, resolve, and recover from merge and rebase conflicts. ## When to Use - A `git merge` or `git rebase` reports conflicts - A `git cherry-pick` cannot apply cleanly - A `git pull` results in conflicting changes - A `git stash pop` conflicts with current working tree ## Inputs - **Required**: Repository with active conflicts - **Optional**: Preferred resolution strategy (ours, theirs, manual) - **Optional**: Context about which changes should take priority ## Procedure ### Step 1: Identify the Conflict Source Determine what operation caused the conflict: ```bash # Check current status git status # Look for indicators: # "You have unmerged paths" — merge conflict # "rebase in progress" — rebase conflict # "cherry-pick in progress" — cherry-pick conflict ``` The status output tells you which files have conflicts and what operation is in progress. **Expected:** `git status` shows files listed under "Unmerged paths" and indicates the active operation. **On failure:** If `git status` shows a clean tree but you expected conflicts, the operation may have already been completed or aborted. Check `git log` for recent activity. ### Step 2: Read Conflict Markers Open each conflicting file and locate the conflict markers: ```text <<<<<<< HEAD // Your current branch's version const result = calculateWeightedMean(data, weights); ======= // Incoming branch's version const result = computeWeightedAverage(data, weights); >>>>>>> feature/rename-functions ``` - `<<<<<<< HEAD` to `=======`: Your current branch (or the branch you're rebasing onto) - `=======` to `>>>>>>>`: The incoming changes (the branch being merged or the commit being applied) **Expected:** Each conflicting file contains one or more blocks with `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` markers. **On failure:** If no markers are found but files show as conflicting, the conflict may be a binary file or a deleted-vs-modified conflict. Check `git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U` for the full list. ### Step 3: Choose a Resolution Strategy **Manual merge** (most common): Edit the file to combine both changes logically, then remove all conflict markers. **Accept ours** (keep current branch's version): ```bash # For a single file git checkout --ours path/to/file.R git add path/to/file.R # For all conflicts git checkout --ours . git add -A ``` **Accept theirs** (keep incoming branch's version): ```bash # For a single file git checkout --theirs path/to/file.R git add path/to/file.R # For all conflicts git checkout --theirs . git add -A ``` **Expected:** After resolution, the file contains the correct merged content with no remaining conflict markers. **On failure:** If you chose the wrong side, re-read the conflicting version from the merge base. During a merge, `git checkout -m path/to/file` re-creates the conflict markers so you can try again. ### Step 4: Mark Files as Resolved After editing each conflicting file: ```bash # Stage the resolved file git add path/to/resolved-file.R # Check remaining conflicts git status ``` Repeat for every file listed under "Unmerged paths". **Expected:** All files move from "Unmerged paths" to "Changes to be committed". No conflict markers remain in any file. **On failure:** If `git add` fails or markers remain, re-open the file and ensure all `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` lines are removed. ### Step 5: Continue the Operation Once all conflicts are resolved: **For merge**: ```bash git commit # Git auto-populates the merge commit message ``` **For rebase**: ```bash git rebase --continue # May encounter more conflicts on subsequent commits — repeat steps 2-4 ``` **For cherry-pick**: ```bash git cherry-pick --continue ``` **For stash pop**: ```bash # Stash pop conflicts don't need a continue — just commit or reset git add . git commit -m "Apply stashed changes with conflict resolution" ``` **Expected:** The operation completes. `git status` shows a clean working tree (or moves to the next commit during rebase). **On failure:** If the continue command fails, check `git status` for remaining unresolved files. All conflicts must be resolved before continuing. ### Step 6: Abort if Needed If resolution is too complex or you chose the wrong approach, abort safely: ```bash # Abort merge git merge --abort # Abort rebase git rebase --abort # Abort cherry-pick git cherry-pick --abort ``` **Expected:** Repository returns to the state before the operation started. No data loss. **On failure:** If abort fails (rare), check `git reflog` to find the commit before the operation and `git reset --hard <commit>` to restore it. Use with caution — this discards uncommitted changes. ### Step 7: Verify Resolution After the operation completes: ```bash # Verify clean working tree git status # Check that the merge/rebase result is correct git log --oneline -5 git diff HEAD~1 # Run tests to confirm nothing is broken # (language-specific: devtools::test(), npm test, cargo test, etc.) ``` **Expected:** Clean working tree, correct merge history, tests pass. **On failure:** If tests fail after resolution, the merge may have introduced logical errors even though syntax conflicts are resolved. Review the diff carefully and fix. ## Validation - [ ] No conflict markers (`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, `>>>>>>>`) remain in any file - [ ] `git status` shows a clean working tree - [ ] The merge/rebase history is correct in `git log` - [ ] Tests pass after conflict resolution - [ ] No unintended changes were introduced ## Common Pitfalls - **Blindly accepting one side**: `--ours` or `--theirs` discards the other side entirely. Only use when you are certain one version is completely correct. - **Leaving conflict markers in code**: Always search the entire file for remaining markers after editing. A partial resolution breaks the code. - **Amending during rebase**: During an interactive rebase, do not `--amend` unless the rebase step specifically calls for it. Use `git rebase --continue` instead. - **Losing work on abort**: `git rebase --abort` and `git merge --abort` discard all resolution work. Only abort if you want to start over. - **Not testing after resolution**: A syntactically clean merge can still be logically wrong. Always run tests. - **Force-pushing after rebase**: After rebasing a shared branch, coordinate with collaborators before force-pushing, as it rewrites history. ## Related Skills - `commit-changes` - committing after conflict resolution - `manage-git-branches` - branch workflows that lead to conflicts - `configure-git-repository` - repository setup and merge strategies
More Git Workflows skills
git-commit
github/awesome-copilot
Execute git commit with conventional commit message analysis, intelligent staging, and message generation. Use when user asks to commit changes, create a git commit, or mentions "/commit". Supports: (1) Auto-detecting type and scope from changes, (2) Generating conventional commit messages from diff, (3) Interactive commit with optional type/scope/description overrides, (4) Intelligent file staging for logical grouping
git-workflow-and-versioning
addyosmani/agent-skills
Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams. Use when cutting a release, choosing a semantic version bump, tagging, or writing a changelog.
resolve-merge-conflicts
warpdotdev/common-skills
Resolve Git merge conflicts by extracting only unresolved paths, conflict hunks, and compact diffs instead of loading whole files into context. Use when a merge, rebase, cherry-pick, or stash pop stops on conflicts, when `git status` shows unmerged paths, or when files contain conflict markers.

