writing-mstest-tests
>
Works with
Claude CodeCursorCodex CLIGitHub CopilotGemini CLI
---
name: writing-mstest-tests
description: >
license: MIT
---
# Writing MSTest Tests
Help users write effective MSTest unit tests without exceeding the API level or
conventions of the project's installed test stack.
## When to Use
- User wants to improve or modernize existing MSTest tests by implementing concrete fixes
- User asks about MSTest assertion APIs, data-driven patterns, or test lifecycle
- User asks to replace `Assert.IsTrue` with more specific assertions (collections, nulls, types, comparisons)
- User asks to replace hard casts with type-checking assertions in tests
- User needs help fixing a specific MSTest test bug or failing assertion
- User asks to fix swapped `Assert.AreEqual` argument order (expected first, actual second)
- User asks to convert `DynamicData` from `IEnumerable<object[]>` to ValueTuple-based data
- User asks to fix or understand an MSTest analyzer diagnostic (an `MSTESTxxxx` warning/error)
## When Not to Use
- User needs a test quality audit, anti-pattern detection, or flaky-test investigation (use `test-anti-patterns`)
- User needs to run or execute tests (use the `run-tests` skill)
- User needs to upgrade from MSTest v1/v2 to v3 (use `migrate-mstest-v1v2-to-v3`)
- User needs to upgrade from MSTest v3 to v4 (use `migrate-mstest-v3-to-v4`)
- User needs CI/CD pipeline configuration
- User is using xUnit, NUnit, or TUnit (not MSTest)
## Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| Code under test | No | The production code to be tested |
| Existing test code | No | Current tests to fix, update, or modernize |
| Test scenario description | No | What behavior the user wants to test |
## Response Guidelines
- **Specific API or pattern questions** (assertions, data-driven, lifecycle): Jump directly to the relevant workflow step. Do not follow the full workflow.
- **Generate new tests from scratch**: Hand off to `code-testing-agent`; use this
skill only as supporting MSTest API/version guidance.
- **Review and fix existing tests**: Fix only the issues present. Do not add unrelated improvements.
- **Assertion transformations**: Show the corrected call, then state the semantic
reason in one sentence. For `Assert.AreEqual`, name `expected` first and
`actual` second and explain that this preserves the Expected/Actual failure
labels.
- **Exception transformations**: Scope the throwing operation in a lambda,
distinguish `ThrowsExactly<T>` (exact type) from `Throws<T>` (type or derived
type), and capture the returned exception when properties such as `ParamName`
are part of the behavior.
## Workflow
### Step 1: Determine project setup
Check the test project, `packages.config`, and assembly reference `HintPath`
values for the exact MSTest version and project system:
- If using `MSTest.Sdk`: resolve its exact version from the project SDK
declaration or `global.json` `msbuild-sdks`; do not assume the latest APIs
- If using `MSTest` metapackage: resolve its exact package version
- If using `MSTest.TestFramework` + `MSTest.TestAdapter`: check version for feature availability
- If using classic non-SDK XML (`ToolsVersion`, `Microsoft.CSharp.targets`,
explicit `<Compile Include>`) and/or `packages.config`: preserve that project
system and add each new test file to `<Compile Include>`.
Also inspect representative tests for custom base fixtures, helper libraries,
mock syntax, naming, setup, and data builders. Existing conventions and installed
versions win over the examples below. Do not upgrade MSTest, Moq, NBuilder, or
the project format unless the user explicitly asks for a migration.
### MSTest API availability
| API/pattern | Minimum version | Compatible fallback |
|---|---:|---|
| `Assert.ThrowsExactly*`, unified `Assert.Contains` / `HasCount` / `IsEmpty` / `IsNotEmpty` | 3.8 | `Assert.ThrowsException*`, `CollectionAssert`, `StringAssert` |
| `Assert.IsGreaterThan`, `IsLessThan`, `IsInRange`, `StartsWith`, `EndsWith`, `MatchesRegex` | 3.10 | `Assert.IsTrue` with a clear message, or `StringAssert` |
| ValueTuple `DynamicData` | 3.7 | `IEnumerable<object[]>` |
| Constructor injection of `TestContext` | 3.6 | Instance `TestContext` property |
| `[Retry]`, `[OSCondition]` | 3.8 | No built-in retry/OS condition; fix flakiness or retain the existing condition mechanism |
| `[CICondition]` | 3.10 | Existing project-specific condition mechanism |
For example, MSTest 3.5.x must not receive `Assert.ThrowsExactly`,
`Assert.Contains`, ValueTuple `DynamicData`, or constructor-injected
`TestContext`.
Treat this as a hard gate: after determining the version, do not copy a later
example from this skill unless its minimum version is satisfied.
Recommend MSTest.Sdk or the MSTest metapackage only for genuinely new projects:
```xml
<!-- Option 1: MSTest SDK (simplest, recommended for new projects) -->
<Project Sdk="MSTest.Sdk">
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>net9.0</TargetFramework>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>
```
When using `MSTest.Sdk`, put the version in `global.json` instead of the project file so all test projects get bumped together:
```json
{
"msbuild-sdks": {
"MSTest.Sdk": "3.8.2"
}
}
```
```xml
<!-- Option 2: MSTest metapackage -->
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>net9.0</TargetFramework>
</PropertyGroup>
<ItemGroup>
<PackageReference Include="MSTest" Version="3.8.2" />
</ItemGroup>
</Project>
```
### Step 2: Write test classes following conventions
Apply these structural conventions only where they do not conflict with the
suite's established base classes and lifecycle:
- **Seal test classes** with `sealed` for performance and design clarity
- Use `[TestClass]` on the class and `[TestMethod]` on test methods
- Follow the **Arrange-Act-Assert** (AAA) pattern
- Name tests using `MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior`
- Use separate test projects with naming convention `[ProjectName].Tests`
```csharp
[TestClass]
public sealed class OrderServiceTests
{
[TestMethod]
public void CalculateTotal_WithDiscount_ReturnsReducedPrice()
{
// Arrange
var service = new OrderService();
var order = new Order { Price = 100m, DiscountPercent = 10 };
// Act
var total = service.CalculateTotal(order);
// Assert
Assert.AreEqual(90m, total);
}
}
```
### Step 3: Use version-compatible assertion APIs
Pick the most specific assertion supported by the installed MSTest version.
More specific assertions produce better failure messages and make the test's
intent clear, but uncompilable "modern" assertions are worse than compatible
`StringAssert`, `CollectionAssert`, or `Assert.IsTrue` calls.
| What you are testing | Assertion |
|---|---|
| Two values are equal | `Assert.AreEqual(expected, actual)` |
| Same object instance (reference identity) | `Assert.AreSame(expected, actual)` |
| Value is null | `Assert.IsNull(value)` |
| Value is not null | `Assert.IsNotNull(value)` |
| Collection is empty | `Assert.IsEmpty(collection)` (3.8+) or `CollectionAssert` / count assertion |
| Collection is not empty | `Assert.IsNotEmpty(collection)` (3.8+) or count assertion |
| Collection has exactly N items | `Assert.HasCount(N, collection)` (3.8+) or `Assert.AreEqual` on count |
| Collection contains an item | `Assert.Contains(item, collection)` (3.8+) or `CollectionAssert.Contains` |
| Collection does not contain an item | `Assert.DoesNotContain(item, collection)` (3.8+) or `CollectionAssert.DoesNotContain` |
| Object is a specific type | `Assert.IsInstanceOfType<T>(value)` |
| Code throws an exception | `Assert.ThrowsExactly<T>` (3.8+) or `Assert.ThrowsException<T>` (earlier) |
On MSTest 3.8+, prefer `Assert` class methods over `StringAssert` or
`CollectionAssert` where both exist. Older versions should keep the compatible
specialized classes.
#### Equality, null, and reference checks
```csharp
Assert.AreEqual(expected, actual); // Value equality
Assert.AreSame(expected, actual); // Reference equality -- same object instance
Assert.IsNull(value);
Assert.IsNotNull(value);
```
#### Exception testing
```csharp
// MSTest 3.8+
var ex = Assert.ThrowsExactly<ArgumentNullException>(() => service.Process(null));
Assert.AreEqual("input", ex.ParamName);
// Async
var ex = await Assert.ThrowsExactlyAsync<InvalidOperationException>(
async () => await service.ProcessAsync(null));
```
- `Assert.Throws<T>` matches `T` or any derived type
- `Assert.ThrowsExactly<T>` matches only the exact type `T`
On MSTest 3.7 and earlier, use the compatible API:
```csharp
var ex = Assert.ThrowsException<ArgumentNullException>(
() => service.Process(null));
```
#### Collection assertions
```csharp
// MSTest 3.8+
Assert.Contains(expectedItem, collection);
Assert.DoesNotContain(unexpectedItem, collection);
var single = Assert.ContainsSingle(collection); // Returns the single element
Assert.HasCount(3, collection);
Assert.IsEmpty(collection);
Assert.IsNotEmpty(collection);
```
On earlier versions use `CollectionAssert.Contains`,
`CollectionAssert.DoesNotContain`, and `Assert.AreEqual(expectedCount,
collection.Count)`.
Replace generic `Assert.IsTrue` with specialized assertions -- they give better failure messages:
| Instead of | Use |
|---|---|
| `Assert.IsTrue(list.Count > 0)` | `Assert.IsNotEmpty(list)` |
| `Assert.IsTrue(list.Count == 0)` | `Assert.IsEmpty(list)` |
| `Assert.IsTrue(list.Count() == 3)` | `Assert.HasCount(3, list)` |
| `Assert.IsTrue(x != null)` | `Assert.IsNotNull(x)` |
| `Assert.IsTrue(x == null)` | `Assert.IsNull(x)` |
| `Assert.AreEqual(a, b)` for same instance | `Assert.AreSame(a, b)` -- reference identity |
| `Assert.IsTrue(!list.Contains(item))` | `Assert.DoesNotContain(item, list)` |
| `list.Single(predicate)` + `Assert.IsNotNull` | `Assert.ContainsSingle(list)` |
| `Assert.IsTrue(list.Contains(item))` | `Assert.Contains(item, list)` |
#### String assertions
```csharp
// MSTest 3.10+
Assert.Contains("expected", actualString);
Assert.StartsWith("prefix", actualString);
Assert.EndsWith("suffix", actualString);
Assert.MatchesRegex(@"\d{3}-\d{4}", phoneNumber);
```
On earlier versions use `StringAssert.Contains`, `StringAssert.StartsWith`,
`StringAssert.EndsWith`, and `StringAssert.Matches`.
#### Type assertions
```csharp
// MSTest 3.x -- out parameter
Assert.IsInstanceOfType<MyHandler>(result, out var typed);
typed.Handle();
// MSTest 4.x -- returns directly
var typed = Assert.IsInstanceOfType<MyHandler>(result);
```
#### Comparison assertions
```csharp
Assert.IsGreaterThan(lowerBound, actual);
Assert.IsLessThan(upperBound, actual);
Assert.IsInRange(low, high, actual);
```
### Step 4: Use data-driven tests for multiple inputs
#### DataRow for inline values
```csharp
[TestMethod]
[DataRow(1, 2, 3)]
[DataRow(0, 0, 0, DisplayName = "Zeros")]
[DataRow(-1, 1, 0)]
public void Add_ReturnsExpectedSum(int a, int b, int expected)
{
Assert.AreEqual(expected, Calculator.Add(a, b));
}
```
#### DynamicData with ValueTuples (preferred for complex data)
On MSTest 3.7+, prefer `ValueTuple` return types over
`IEnumerable<object[]>` for type safety. Keep `IEnumerable<object[]>` on older
versions.
```csharp
[TestMethod]
[DynamicData(nameof(DiscountTestData))]
public void ApplyDiscount_ReturnsExpectedPrice(decimal price, int percent, decimal expected)
{
var result = PriceCalculator.ApplyDiscount(price, percent);
Assert.AreEqual(expected, result);
}
// ValueTuple -- preferred (MSTest 3.7+)
public static IEnumerable<(decimal price, int percent, decimal expected)> DiscountTestData =>
[
(100m, 10, 90m),
(200m, 25, 150m),
(50m, 0, 50m),
];
```
When you need metadata per test case on MSTest 3.8+, use `TestDataRow<T>`:
```csharp
public static IEnumerable<TestDataRow<(decimal price, int percent, decimal expected)>> DiscountTestDataWithMetadata =>
[
new((100m, 10, 90m)) { DisplayName = "10% discount" },
new((200m, 25, 150m)) { DisplayName = "25% discount" },
new((50m, 0, 50m)) { DisplayName = "No discount" },
];
```
### Step 5: Handle test lifecycle correctly
- Prefer constructor initialization when the existing suite supports it; retain a shared `FixtureBase<TSut>` or established `[TestInitialize]` lifecycle rather than rewriting the fixture architecture incidentally.
- Use `[TestInitialize]` **only** for async initialization, combined with the constructor for sync parts
- Use `[TestCleanup]` for cleanup that must run even on failure
- Inject `TestContext` via constructor only on MSTest 3.6+; otherwise use the instance property.
```csharp
[TestClass]
public sealed class RepositoryTests
{
private readonly TestContext _testContext;
private readonly FakeDatabase _db; // readonly -- guaranteed by constructor
public RepositoryTests(TestContext testContext)
{
_testContext = testContext;
_db = new FakeDatabase(); // sync init in ctor
}
[TestInitialize]
public async Task InitAsync()
{
// Use TestInitialize ONLY for async setup
await _db.SeedAsync();
}
[TestCleanup]
public void Cleanup() => _db.Reset();
}
```
#### Execution order
1. `[AssemblyInitialize]` -- once per assembly
2. `[ClassInitialize]` -- once per class
3. Per test:
- With `TestContext` property injection: Constructor -> set `TestContext` property -> `[TestInitialize]`
- With constructor injection of `TestContext`: Constructor (receives `TestContext`) -> `[TestInitialize]`
4. Test method
5. `[TestCleanup]` -> `DisposeAsync` -> `Dispose` -- per test
6. `[ClassCleanup]` -- once per class
7. `[AssemblyCleanup]` -- once per assembly
### Step 6: Apply cancellation and timeout patterns
Use `TestContext.CancellationToken` with `[Timeout]` only when the installed
MSTest version exposes it. On older versions, use a test-owned
`CancellationTokenSource` where cancellation itself is under test.
```csharp
[TestMethod]
[Timeout(5000)]
public async Task FetchData_ReturnsWithinTimeout()
{
var result = await _client.GetDataAsync(_testContext.CancellationToken);
Assert.IsNotNull(result);
}
```
### Step 7: Use advanced features where appropriate
#### Retry flaky tests (MSTest 3.8+)
Use only for genuinely flaky external dependencies (network, file system), not to paper over race conditions or shared state issues.
```csharp
[TestMethod]
[Retry(3)]
public void ExternalService_EventuallyResponds() { }
```
#### Conditional execution
`OSCondition` requires MSTest 3.8+; `CICondition` requires MSTest 3.10+.
```csharp
[TestMethod]
[OSCondition(OperatingSystems.Windows)]
public void WindowsRegistry_ReadsValue() { }
[TestMethod]
[CICondition(ConditionMode.Exclude)]
public void LocalOnly_InteractiveTest() { }
```
#### Parallelization
```csharp
[assembly: Parallelize(Workers = 4, Scope = ExecutionScope.MethodLevel)]
[TestClass]
[DoNotParallelize] // Opt out specific classes
public sealed class DatabaseIntegrationTests { }
```
### Step 8: Fix MSTest analyzer diagnostics (MSTESTxxxx)
The `MSTest.Analyzers` package reports `MSTESTxxxx` diagnostics during build and in the IDE. The analyzers come in automatically with the modern `MSTest` metapackage and `MSTest.Sdk` (and are bundled with `MSTest.TestFramework` 3.7+); for other setups, reference `MSTest.Analyzers` explicitly only when the user asks to adopt analyzers. Most rules have an automated code fix (light bulb) in Visual Studio. When fixing one by hand, apply the idiomatic, version-compatible change below rather than suppressing the rule.
When asked to "fix MSTESTxxxx", look it up in the table of common diagnostics below, apply the fix, and rebuild to confirm the diagnostic is gone. The table is not exhaustive — for any rule it does not list, consult the full reference and apply the documented guidance: <https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/core/testing/mstest-analyzers/overview>.
#### Common diagnostics and their fixes
| Rule | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| MSTEST0006 | `[ExpectedException]` used | On 3.8+, replace with `Assert.Throws<T>` / `Assert.ThrowsExactly<T>`; otherwise use `Assert.ThrowsException<T>` |
| MSTEST0017 | `Assert.AreEqual` args swapped | Put `expected` first, `actual` second |
| MSTEST0023 | Negated boolean assertion (`Assert.IsTrue(!x)`) | Use `Assert.IsFalse(x)` |
| MSTEST0025 | Always-false condition asserted | Use `Assert.Fail("reason")` |
| MSTEST0032 | Always-true assert condition | Remove or correct the assertion |
| MSTEST0037 | Sub-optimal assert (`IsTrue(x == null)`) | Use the specific assert (`Assert.IsNull`, `HasCount`, etc.) (Step 3) |
| MSTEST0038 | `Assert.AreSame` on value types | Use `Assert.AreEqual` (value types box to distinct references) |
| MSTEST0039 | Legacy `Assert.ThrowsException` | On 3.8+, use `Assert.Throws` / `Assert.ThrowsExactly` (+ `Async` variants) |
| MSTEST0044 | `[DataTestMethod]` used | Replace with `[TestMethod]` only on a version where it supports data rows |
| MSTEST0046 | `StringAssert` used | On 3.10+, use the equivalent `Assert` method (`Assert.Contains`, `StartsWith`, ...) |
| MSTEST0052 | Explicit `DynamicDataSourceType` | Drop it — the source type is inferred |
| MSTEST0042 / MSTEST0060 | Duplicate `[DataRow]` / `[TestMethod]` | Remove the duplicate attribute |
| MSTEST0024 | Static `TestContext` field | Make it an instance member (Step 5) |
| MSTEST0045 / MSTEST0049 / MSTEST0054 | Timeout/token not cooperative | Flow `TestContext.CancellationToken` into the awaited call (Step 6) |
| MSTEST0036 | Member shadows a base test member | Rename or use `override` instead of `new` |
| MSTEST0061 | Runtime OS check inside a test | Use `[OSCondition(...)]` (Step 7) |
| MSTEST0002 / MSTEST0003 / MSTEST0005 / MSTEST0007–0014 | Invalid test class / method / fixture / `TestContext` / data-source layout | Correct the signature named by the rule (e.g. make it public, fix the return type and parameters, add `static` where required) |
#### Tuning which rules are enforced
Use the `MSTestAnalysisMode` MSBuild property (MSTest 3.8+) to control the rule set globally:
```xml
<PropertyGroup>
<!-- None | Default | Recommended | All -->
<MSTestAnalysisMode>Recommended</MSTestAnalysisMode>
</PropertyGroup>
```
- `Recommended` escalates info-level rules to warnings and is the mode most projects should adopt.
- A handful of rules are completely opt-in (e.g. MSTEST0015, MSTEST0019–0022); enable them per project via `.editorconfig` when you want their convention enforced.
- Prefer fixing the underlying code over suppressing a diagnostic. Suppress only with a documented justification.More General & Other skills
find-skills
vercel-labs/skills
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
1.5M
grill-me
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
972.7k
grill-with-docs
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.
828.8k

