prowler-test-api
Use authenticated_client for normal view behavior tests. It uses a cheap JWT and still runs the real request authentication path. Use serializer-generated JWTs or API-key clients only when the test is specifically about token obtain/refresh, invalid tokens, expired tokens, tenant switching by token,…
Works with
Agent Skills format with YAML frontmatter. Claude Code reads it as-is.
---
name: "prowler-test-api"
description: "Use authenticated_client for normal view behavior tests. It uses a cheap JWT and still runs the real request authentication path. Use serializer-generated JWTs or API-key clients only when the test is specifically about token obtain/refresh, invalid tokens, expired tokens, tenant switching by token,…"
license: "Apache-2.0"
---
## Critical Rules
- ALWAYS use `response.json()["data"]` not `response.data`
- ALWAYS use `content_type = "application/vnd.api+json"` for PATCH/PUT requests
- ALWAYS use `format="vnd.api+json"` for POST requests
- ALWAYS test cross-tenant isolation - RLS returns 404, NOT 403
- NEVER skip RLS isolation tests when adding new endpoints
- NEVER use realistic-looking API keys in tests (TruffleHog will flag them)
- ALWAYS mock BOTH `.delay()` AND `Task.objects.get` for async task tests
---
## 1. Fixture Dependency Chain
```text
create_test_user (session) ─► tenants_fixture (function) ─► authenticated_client
│
└─► aws_provider ─► scans_fixture ─► findings_fixture
```
### Key Fixtures
| Fixture | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| `create_test_user` | Session user (`dev@prowler.com`) |
| `tenants_fixture` | 3 tenants: [0],[1] have membership, [2] isolated |
| `authenticated_client` | Django test client with JWT for tenant[0] |
| `authenticated_client_for_tenant_factory` | Creates a Django test client with JWT for a specific user and tenant |
| `provider_factory` | Creates one validated provider with provider-specific defaults |
| `aws_provider` | 1 AWS provider in tenant[0] |
| `aws_provider_pair` | 2 AWS providers in tenant[0] |
| `all_provider_types_fixture` | 1 provider for every supported provider type |
| `tasks_fixture` | 2 Celery tasks with TaskResult |
### RBAC Fixtures
| Fixture | Permissions |
|---------|-------------|
| `authenticated_client_rbac` | All permissions (admin) |
| `authenticated_client_rbac_noroles` | Membership but NO roles |
| `authenticated_client_no_permissions_rbac` | All permissions = False |
Use `authenticated_client` for normal view behavior tests. It uses a cheap JWT
and still runs the real request authentication path. Use serializer-generated
JWTs or API-key clients only when the test is specifically about token
obtain/refresh, invalid tokens, expired tokens, tenant switching by token, API
keys, or unauthenticated 401 behavior. Use
`authenticated_client_for_tenant_factory` when a test needs a cheap JWT client
for a different user or tenant.
---
## 2. JSON:API Requests
### POST (Create)
```python
response = client.post(
reverse("provider-list"),
data={"data": {"type": "providers", "attributes": {...}}},
format="vnd.api+json", # NOT content_type!
)
```
### PATCH (Update)
```python
response = client.patch(
reverse("provider-detail", kwargs={"pk": provider.id}),
data={"data": {"type": "providers", "id": str(provider.id), "attributes": {...}}},
content_type="application/vnd.api+json", # NOT format!
)
```
### Reading Responses
```python
data = response.json()["data"]
attrs = data["attributes"]
errors = response.json()["errors"] # For 400 responses
```
---
## 3. RLS Isolation (Cross-Tenant)
**RLS returns 404, NOT 403** - the resource is invisible, not forbidden.
```python
def test_cross_tenant_access_denied(self, authenticated_client, tenants_fixture):
other_tenant = tenants_fixture[2] # Isolated tenant
foreign_provider = Provider.objects.create(tenant_id=other_tenant.id, ...)
response = authenticated_client.get(reverse("provider-detail", args=[foreign_provider.id]))
assert response.status_code == status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND # NOT 403!
```
---
## 4. Celery Task Testing
### Testing Strategies
| Strategy | Use For |
|----------|---------|
| Mock `.delay()` + `Task.objects.get` | Testing views that trigger tasks |
| `task.apply()` | Synchronous task logic testing |
| Mock `chain`/`group` | Testing Canvas orchestration |
| Mock `connection` | Testing `@set_tenant` decorator |
| Mock `apply_async` | Testing Beat scheduled tasks |
### Why NOT `task_always_eager`
| Problem | Impact |
|---------|--------|
| No task serialization | Misses argument type errors |
| No broker interaction | Hides connection issues |
| Different execution context | `self.request` behaves differently |
**Instead, use:** `task.apply()` for sync execution, mocking for isolation.
> **Full examples:** See [assets/api_test.py](assets/api_test.py) for `TestCeleryTaskLogic`, `TestCeleryCanvas`, `TestSetTenantDecorator`, `TestBeatScheduling`.
---
## 5. Fake Secrets (TruffleHog)
```python
# BAD - TruffleHog flags these:
api_key = "sk-test1234567890T3BlbkFJtest1234567890"
# GOOD - obviously fake:
api_key = "sk-fake-test-key-for-unit-testing-only"
```
---
## 6. Response Status Codes
| Scenario | Code |
|----------|------|
| Successful GET | 200 |
| Successful POST | 201 |
| Async operation (DELETE/scan trigger) | 202 |
| Sync DELETE | 204 |
| Validation error | 400 |
| Missing permission (RBAC) | 403 |
| RLS isolation / not found | 404 |
---
## Commands
```bash
cd api && uv run pytest -x --tb=short
cd api && uv run pytest -k "test_provider"
cd api && uv run pytest api/src/backend/api/tests/test_rbac.py
```
---
## Resources
- **Full Examples**: See [assets/api_test.py](assets/api_test.py) for complete test patterns
- **Fixture Reference**: See [references/test-api-docs.md](references/test-api-docs.md)
- **Fixture Source**: `api/src/backend/conftest.py`More General & Other skills
find-skills
vercel-labs/skills
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
grill-me
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
grill-with-docs
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.

