openspec-apply-change
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.
Works with
--- name: openspec-apply-change description: Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks. license: MIT --- Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. **Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `schemas`, `view`). Once selected, treat `--store <id>` as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>"`, not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root. **Input**: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., `/openspec-apply-change add-auth`). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes. **Steps** 1. **Select the change** If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise: - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change - Auto-select if only one active change exists - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes and ask the user to select one Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/openspec-apply-change <other>`). 2. **Check status to understand the schema** ```bash openspec status --change "<name>" --json ``` Parse the JSON to understand: - `schemaName`: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven") - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, and `actionContext`: planning scope and edit constraints - Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others) 3. **Get apply instructions** ```bash openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json ``` This returns: - `contextFiles`: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs) - Progress (total, complete, remaining) - Task list with status - Dynamic instruction based on current state - Optional `context`: current required project instruction input from the selected root - Optional `operationGuidance`: current advisory guidance for apply **Handle states:** - If `state: "blocked"` (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using `/openspec-continue-change` (if it is not installed, run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` to see the next artifact and `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json` for how to create it) - If `state: "all_done"`: congratulate, suggest archive - Otherwise: proceed to implementation Treat `context` as a required prompt-level input. Read and consider it, and apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints while implementing. Treat `operationGuidance` as optional additive advice. Read and consider every entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in workflow. Keep both fields separate from CLI-returned state, missing artifacts, tasks, progress, `contextFiles`, and the built-in `instruction`. They are not evidence of task completion, do not replace the built-in instruction, and do not permit bypassing a blocked state. If context conflicts with the built-in instruction, an explicit user choice, or a CLI-controlled value, report the conflict and preserve the controlling value. If guidance is inapplicable or conflicts with those controlling inputs, do not follow it and explain why. These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks. 4. **Read context files** Read every file path listed under `contextFiles` from the apply instructions output. The files depend on the schema being used: - **spec-driven**: proposal, specs, design, tasks - Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output Do not copy `context` or `operationGuidance` verbatim into implementation files or planning artifacts unless the user separately asks for that content. 5. **Show current progress** Display: - Schema being used - Progress: "N/M tasks complete" - Remaining tasks overview - Dynamic instruction from CLI 6. **Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)** For each pending task: - Show which task is being worked on - Make the code changes required - Keep changes minimal and focused - Mark task complete in the tasks file: `- [ ]` → `- [x]` - Continue to next task **Pause if:** - Task is unclear → ask for clarification - Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts - A task needs work beyond what the spec and tasks describe, or you are tempted to drop, narrow, defer, or accept exceptions to specified behavior to make it fit → surface the added scope and ask; do not absorb it silently - Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance - User interrupts 7. **On completion or pause, show status** Display: - Tasks completed this session - Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete" - If all done: suggest archive - If paused: explain why and wait for guidance **Output During Implementation** ``` ## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>) Working on task 3/7: <task description> [...implementation happening...] ✓ Task complete Working on task 4/7: <task description> [...implementation happening...] ✓ Task complete ``` **Output On Completion** ``` ## Implementation Complete **Change:** <change-name> **Schema:** <schema-name> **Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓ ### Completed This Session - [x] Task 1 - [x] Task 2 ... All tasks complete! You can archive this change with `/openspec-archive-change`. ``` **Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)** ``` ## Implementation Paused **Change:** <change-name> **Schema:** <schema-name> **Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete ### Issue Encountered <description of the issue> **Options:** 1. <option 1> 2. <option 2> 3. Other approach What would you like to do? ``` **Guardrails** - Keep going through tasks until done or blocked - Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output) - If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing - If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates - Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task - Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task - Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess - When a task needs work beyond what the spec describes, surface the added scope and pause - never silently narrow, defer, or simplify away specified behavior - Only mark a task `- [x]` when its specified behavior is fully implemented, not when it is partially done or deferred - Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names - Do not use context or operation guidance as proof that a task is complete - Apply relevant project context; report conflicts with controlling workflow inputs - Consider every guidance entry; explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice - Do not copy runtime context or operation guidance into implementation files or planning artifacts - Preserve CLI-controlled blocked/ready/all-done behavior and completion criteria **Fluid Workflow Integration** This skill supports the "actions on a change" model: - **Can be invoked anytime**: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions - **Allows artifact updates**: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly
More General & Other skills
find-skills
vercel-labs/skills
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
grill-me
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
grill-with-docs
mattpocock/skills
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.

