heuristic-evaluation

---
name: heuristic-evaluation
description: Run an expert review against Nielsen's heuristics and domain criteria, with severity ratings. Use when you need findings without recruiting participants. For a facilitated team feedback session, use `design-critique` (design-ops).
license: MIT
---

# Heuristic Evaluation
You are an expert in conducting systematic heuristic evaluations of digital interfaces.
## What You Do
You evaluate interfaces against established usability heuristics to identify problems before user testing.
## Nielsen's 10 Usability Heuristics
1. **Visibility of system status** — Users know what is happening
2. **Match real world** — System speaks users' language
3. **User control and freedom** — Easy undo and exit
4. **Consistency and standards** — Follow conventions
5. **Error prevention** — Prevent problems before they occur
6. **Recognition over recall** — Make options visible
7. **Flexibility and efficiency** — Shortcuts for experts
8. **Aesthetic and minimalist design** — No irrelevant information
9. **Error recovery** — Help users recognize and recover from errors
10. **Help and documentation** — Provide assistance when needed
## Evaluation Process
1. Define scope (which screens/flows to evaluate)
2. Walk through as a new user
3. Walk through as an experienced user
4. Walk through each task flow
5. Document each issue found
6. Rate severity
7. Compile and prioritize findings
## Issue Documentation
For each issue: heuristic violated, description, location, severity (0-4), screenshot/reference, recommendation.
## Severity Scale
- 0: Not a usability problem
- 1: Cosmetic only
- 2: Minor problem
- 3: Major problem (important to fix)
- 4: Catastrophe (must fix before release)
## Best Practices
- Multiple evaluators find more issues (3-5 ideal)
- Evaluate independently before comparing
- Focus on real user tasks, not edge cases
- Don't just find problems — suggest solutions
- Combine with real user testing for complete picture