heuristic
Produce a scored heuristic critique of the UI using Nielsen's 10 + 6 design laws + optional persona walkthroughs. Outputs a machine-parseable scorecard plus a 0-100 UsabilityScore (the judged companion to the deterministic UICraftScore). Invoke when the user asks for heuristic on their UI, or mentions 'heuristic' alongside design / UI / frontend work.
Works with
Agent Skills format with YAML frontmatter. Claude Code reads it as-is.
--- name: "heuristic" description: "Produce a scored heuristic critique of the UI using Nielsen's 10 + 6 design laws + optional persona walkthroughs. Outputs a machine-parseable scorecard plus a 0-100 UsabilityScore (the judged companion to the deterministic UICraftScore). Invoke when the user asks for heuristic on their UI, or mentions 'heuristic' alongside design / UI / frontend work." license: "MIT" --- <!-- HARNESS MIRROR — do not edit here. Canonical source: skills/ or commands/. After editing source, copy into cli/assets/<harness>/ and repo-root harness mirrors. --> **Context:** this sub-skill is one lens of the broader `ui-craft` skill. If the `ui-craft` skill is also installed, read its SKILL.md first for Discovery + Anti-Slop + Craft Test, then apply the specific lens below. Score the UI at `$ARGUMENTS` against Nielsen's 10 + 6 design laws. Load the `ui-craft` skill. **Step 1 — Load the methodology.** Read `references/heuristics.md` for the full rubric, scoring definitions, design law details, and the required output format. Do NOT invent a new format or a new scale. **Step 2 — Walk Nielsen's 10 heuristics.** Score each 1-5 per the rubric: - **1** blocks users · **2** severe friction · **3** works but confusing · **4** works, minor polish · **5** best-in-class For every heuristic, write a concrete finding — quote text, count elements, name the broken flow. Vague findings are rejected. **Step 3 — Audit the 6 design laws.** PASS / FAIL each with a specific detail: - Fitts's Law — touch target sizing, CTA placement - Hick's Law — choice density, nav + select sizing - Doherty Threshold — perceived latency, optimistic UI - Cleveland-McGill — chart encoding choice - Miller's Law — nav depth, form section counts - Tesler's Law — where complexity lives **Step 4 — Persona walkthrough (if `--persona=` present).** If the args include `--persona=<name>`, load `references/personas.md` and run the matching walkthrough checklist. Supported: `priya`, `jordan`, `adaeze`, `kwame`, `margo`, `all`. Output the walkthrough as a `| Checklist item | Pass/Fail | Finding | Impact |` table. Without the flag, skip this step. **Step 5 — Rank findings by impact tag.** Impact order: `blocks-conversion > adds-friction > reduces-trust > minor-polish`. Include at most 5 findings in the ranked list; cut anything at `minor-polish` unless there are no higher-impact findings. **Step 6 — Compute the UsabilityScore.** Roll the scorecard into a 0-100 number + grade per the **UsabilityScore** formula in `references/heuristics.md`: `heuristic_base = round(((mean(nielsen_scores) − 1) / 4) × 100)`, minus `5 × (failed design laws)`, clamped [0,100]. Same A/B/C/D/F bands as UICraftScore. Always label it `(judged)` — it is **not** deterministic and must never gate CI. If the args include `--json`, also emit the machine-readable block. If the user asks for the full picture, build the **Extended quality report** by fetching the deterministic UICraftScore (`node scripts/eval.mjs <path> --json` or the `score_ui` MCP tool) and placing both side by side — never average them. **Step 7 — Output.** Use the exact scorecard format in `references/heuristics.md`: 1. `## Heuristic Scorecard` table 2. `## Design Law Audit` table 3. `## Persona Walkthrough` table (only if `--persona=` was passed) 4. `## Top findings (ranked by impact)` — numbered list, 3-5 items 5. `## UsabilityScore` block — the 0-100 score + grade + component breakdown **Knob awareness:** knob-agnostic. Usability is not a knob — a 2 is a 2 whether `CRAFT_LEVEL` is 3 or 9. Do not soften scores based on `CRAFT_LEVEL`. **Output contract:** - This command produces a **critique artifact**, not code. No edits unless the user explicitly asks in a follow-up. - The scorecard is machine-parseable markdown. A PM can paste it into any issue tracker and file tickets row-by-row. Frame it that way in any preamble. - No "First Impressions" paragraph, no hedging, no praise padding. Tables + ranked list only. Do NOT edit code. This is a scored critique. **Next step:** Fix the findings, then `/finalize` — the scorecard is the input to a gated ship (rung 3).
More Frontend Frameworks skills
frontend-design
anthropics/skills
Guidance for distinctive, intentional visual design when building new UI or reshaping an existing one. Helps with aesthetic direction, typography, and making choices that don't read as templated defaults.
design-taste-frontend
leonxlnx/taste-skill
Anti-slop frontend skill for landing pages, portfolios, and redesigns. The agent reads the brief, infers the right design direction, and ships interfaces that do not look templated. Real design systems when applicable, audit-first on redesigns, strict pre-flight check.
hyperframes-creative
heygen-com/hyperframes
Non-animation creative direction for HyperFrames videos. Use for design spec (frame.md / design.md) handling, palettes, typography, narration, beat planning, audio-reactive visuals, composition patterns, and brand / style decisions. For atomic motion patterns and scene blueprints, use hyperframes-animation.

