test-flakiness
Detect non-deterministic (flaky) tests by reading CI run logs or test result history. Aggregates pass rates per test, identifies intermittent failures, recommends quarantine or fix, and maintains a flaky test registry. Best run during Polish phase or after multiple CI runs.
Works with
--- name: test-flakiness description: Detect non-deterministic (flaky) tests by reading CI run logs or test result history. Aggregates pass rates per test, identifies intermittent failures, recommends quarantine or fix, and maintains a flaky test registry. Best run during Polish phase or after multiple CI runs. license: MIT --- # Test Flakiness Detection A flaky test is one that sometimes passes and sometimes fails without any code change. Flaky tests are worse than no tests in some ways — they train the team to ignore red CI runs, masking genuine failures. This skill identifies them, explains likely causes, and recommends whether to quarantine or fix each one. **Output:** Updated `tests/regression-suite.md` quarantine section + optional `production/qa/flakiness-report-[date].md` **When to run:** - Polish phase (tests have had many runs; statistical signal is reliable) - When developers start dismissing CI failures as "probably flaky" - After `/regression-suite` identifies quarantined tests that need diagnosis --- ## 1. Parse Arguments **Modes:** - `/test-flakiness [ci-log-path]` — analyse a specific CI run log file - `/test-flakiness scan` — scan all available CI logs in `.github/` or standard log output directories - `/test-flakiness registry` — read existing regression-suite.md quarantine section and provide remediation guidance for already-known flaky tests - No argument — auto-detect: run `scan` if CI logs are accessible, else `registry` --- ## 2. Locate CI Log Data ### Option A — GitHub Actions (preferred) Check for test result artifacts: ```bash ls -t .github/ 2>/dev/null ls -t test-results/ 2>/dev/null ``` For Godot projects: GdUnit4 outputs XML results compatible with JUnit format. Check `test-results/` for `.xml` files. For Unity projects: game-ci test runner outputs NUnit XML to `test-results/` by default. For Unreal projects: automation logs go to `Saved/Logs/`. Grep for `Result: Success` and `Result: Fail` patterns. ### Option B — Local log files If a path argument is provided, read that file directly. ### Option C — No log data available If no logs found: > "No CI log data found. To detect flaky tests, this skill needs test result > history from multiple runs. Options: > 1. Run the test suite at least 3 times and collect the output logs > 2. Check CI pipeline output and save a log to `test-results/` > 3. Run `/test-flakiness registry` to review tests already flagged as flaky > in `tests/regression-suite.md`" Stop and ask the user which option to pursue. --- ## 3. Parse Test Results For each CI log or result file found, parse: **JUnit XML format** (GdUnit4 / Unity): - Grep for `<testcase name=` to get test names - Grep for `<failure` or `<error` to identify failures - Parse `classname` and `name` attributes for full test identifiers **Plain text logs**: - Grep for pass/fail patterns: - Godot: `PASSED` / `FAILED` adjacent to test names - Unreal: `Result: Success` / `Result: Fail` - Unity: `Test passed` / `Test failed` Build a table: `test_id → [run1_result, run2_result, run3_result, ...]` --- ## 4. Identify Flaky Tests A test is **flaky** if it appears in the result history with both PASS and FAIL outcomes across runs with no code changes between them. Flakiness thresholds: - **High flakiness**: Fails in >25% of runs — quarantine immediately - **Moderate flakiness**: Fails in 5–25% of runs — investigate and fix soon - **Low/suspected flakiness**: Fails in 1–5% of runs — monitor; may be genuinely rare failure For each flaky test, classify the likely cause: ### Cause classification | Cause | Symptoms | Fix direction | |-------|----------|---------------| | **Timing / async** | Fails after awaiting signals or timers; pass rate correlates with system load | Add explicit await/synchronisation; avoid time-based delays | | **Order dependency** | Fails when run after specific other tests; passes in isolation | Add proper setup/teardown; ensure test isolation | | **Random seed** | Fails intermittently with no pattern; involves RNG | Pass explicit seed; don't use `randf()` in tests | | **Resource leak** | Fails more often later in a test run | Fix cleanup in teardown; check orphan nodes (Godot) or object disposal (Unity) | | **External state** | Fails when a file, scene, or global exists from a prior test | Isolate test from file system; use in-memory mocks | | **Floating point** | Fails on comparisons like `== 0.5` | Use epsilon comparison (`is_equal_approx`, `Assert.AreApproximately`) | | **Scene/prefab load race** | Fails when scenes are not yet ready | Await one frame after instantiation; use `await get_tree().process_frame` | Use Grep to check the test file for timing calls, randf, global state access, or equality comparisons on floats to narrow down the cause. --- ## 5. Recommend Action For each flaky test: **Quarantine (High flakiness):** > "Quarantine this test immediately. Disable it in CI by adding > `@pytest.mark.skip` / `[Ignore]` / `GdUnitSkip` annotation. Log it in > `tests/regression-suite.md` quarantine section. The test is now opt-in only. > Fix the root cause before removing quarantine." **Investigate and fix soon (Moderate):** > "This test is intermittently unreliable. Root cause appears to be [cause]. > Suggested fix: [specific fix based on cause classification]. Do not quarantine > yet — fix the test directly." **Monitor (Low/suspected):** > "This test shows suspected flakiness. Collect more run data before > quarantining. Note it as 'suspected' in the regression suite." --- ## 6. Generate Reports ### In-conversation summary ``` ## Flakiness Detection Results **Runs analysed**: [N] **Tests tracked**: [N] ### Flaky Tests Found | Test | System | Fail Rate | Likely Cause | Recommendation | |------|--------|-----------|--------------|----------------| | [test_name] | [system] | [N]% | Timing | Quarantine + fix async | | [test_name] | [system] | [N]% | Float comparison | Fix: use epsilon compare | | [test_name] | [system] | [N]% | Order dependency | Investigate teardown | ### Clean Tests (no flakiness detected) [N] tests ran across [N] runs with consistent results — no flakiness detected. ### Data Limitations [Note if fewer than 5 runs were available — fewer runs = less statistical confidence] ``` --- ## 7. Update Regression Suite + Optional Report File Ask: "May I update the quarantine section of `tests/regression-suite.md` with the flaky tests found?" If yes: use `Edit` to append entries to the Quarantined Tests table. Never remove existing quarantine entries — only add new ones. Ask (separately): "May I write a full flakiness report to `production/qa/flakiness-report-[date].md`?" The full report includes per-test analysis with cause details and engine-specific fix snippets. After writing: - For each quarantined test: "Add the engine-specific skip annotation to disable this test in CI. Re-enable after the root cause is fixed." - For fix-eligible tests: "The fix for [test] is straightforward — change the equality comparison on line [N] to use `is_equal_approx`." - Summary: "Once all quarantine annotations are applied, CI should run green. Schedule fix work for the [N] quarantined tests before the release gate." --- ## Collaborative Protocol - **Never delete test files** — quarantine means annotate + list, not remove - **Statistical confidence matters** — with < 3 runs, flag findings as "suspected" not "confirmed"; ask if more run data is available - **Fix is always the goal** — quarantine is temporary; surface the fix direction even when recommending quarantine - **Ask before writing** — both the regression-suite update and the report file require explicit approval. On write: Verdict: **COMPLETE** — flakiness report written. On decline: Verdict: **BLOCKED** — user declined write. - **Flakiness in CI is a team problem** — surface the list and recommended actions clearly; do not just silently quarantine without the team knowing
More Debugging skills
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
explore-code
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill for auditable candidate implementation in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory work on an isolated branch or worktree to transplant modules, adapt a backbone, add LoRA or adapter layers, replace a head, or stitch together meaningful low-risk migration ideas with rollback-aware records in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted baseline reproduction, conservative debugging, environment setup, verified contribution claims, or default repository analysis.
safe-debug
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit skill for deep learning research work. Use when the user pastes a traceback, terminal error, CUDA OOM, checkpoint load failure, shape mismatch, NaN loss symptom, or training failure and wants conservative diagnosis before any patching, with debug fixes clearly separated from research contributions. Do not use for broad refactoring, speculative adaptation, automatic exploratory patching, or general repository familiarization.

