regression-suite
Map test coverage to GDD critical paths, identify fixed bugs without regression tests, flag coverage drift from new features, and maintain tests/regression-suite.md. Run after implementing a bug fix or before a release gate.
Works with
---
name: regression-suite
description: Map test coverage to GDD critical paths, identify fixed bugs without regression tests, flag coverage drift from new features, and maintain tests/regression-suite.md. Run after implementing a bug fix or before a release gate.
license: MIT
---
# Regression Suite
This skill ensures that every bug fix is backed by a test that would have
caught the original bug — and that the regression suite stays current as the
game evolves. It also detects when new features have been added without
corresponding regression coverage.
A regression suite is not a new test category — it is a **curated list of
tests already in `tests/`** that collectively cover the game's critical paths
and known failure points. This skill maintains that list.
**Output:** `tests/regression-suite.md`
**When to run:**
- After fixing a bug (confirm a regression test was written or identify gap)
- Before a release gate (`/gate-check polish` requires regression suite exists)
- As part of sprint close to detect coverage drift
---
## 1. Parse Arguments
**Modes:**
- `/regression-suite update` — scan new bug fixes this sprint and check
for regression test presence; add new tests to the suite manifest
- `/regression-suite audit` — full audit of all GDD critical paths vs.
existing test coverage; flag paths with no regression test
- `/regression-suite report` — read-only status report (no writes); suitable
for sprint reviews
- No argument — if a sprint is clearly active (sprint plan exists with in-progress stories), run `update`. If ambiguous or no active sprint is detected, use `AskUserQuestion`:
- Prompt: "No subcommand specified. Which mode do you want to run?"
- Options:
- `[A] update — scan new bug fixes this sprint and add missing regression tests`
- `[B] audit — full audit of all GDD critical paths vs. existing test coverage`
- `[C] report — read-only status report (no writes)`
---
## 2. Load Context
### Step 2a — Load existing regression suite
Read `tests/regression-suite.md` if it exists. Extract:
- Total registered regression tests
- Last updated date
- Any tests flagged as `STALE` or `QUARANTINED`
If it does not exist: note "No regression suite found — will create one."
### Step 2b — Load test inventory
Glob all test files:
```
tests/unit/**/*_test.*
tests/integration/**/*_test.*
tests/regression/**/*
```
For each file, note the system (from directory path) and file name.
Do not read test file contents unless needed for name-to-test mapping.
### Step 2c — Load GDD critical paths
For `audit` mode: read `design/gdd/systems-index.md` to get all systems.
For each MVP-tier system, read its GDD and extract:
- Acceptance Criteria (these define the critical paths)
- Formulas section (formulas must have regression tests)
- Edge Cases section (known edge cases should have regression tests)
For `update` mode: skip full GDD scan. Instead read the current sprint plan
and story files to find stories with Status: Complete this sprint.
### Step 2d — Load closed bugs
Glob `production/qa/bugs/*.md` and filter for bugs with a `Status: Closed`
or `Status: Fixed` field. Note:
- Which story or system the bug was in
- Whether a regression test was mentioned in the fix description
---
## 3. Map Coverage — Critical Paths
For `audit` mode only:
For each GDD acceptance criterion, determine whether a test exists:
1. Grep `tests/unit/[system]/` and `tests/integration/[system]/` for file names
and function names related to the criterion's key noun/verb
2. Assign coverage:
| Status | Meaning |
|--------|---------|
| **COVERED** | A test file exists that targets this criterion's logic |
| **PARTIAL** | A test exists but doesn't cover all cases (e.g. happy path only) |
| **MISSING** | No test found for this critical path |
| **EXEMPT** | Visual/Feel or UI criterion — not automatable by design |
3. Elevate MISSING items that correspond to formulas or state machines to
**HIGH PRIORITY** gap — these are the most likely regression sources.
---
## 4. Map Coverage — Fixed Bugs
For each closed bug:
1. Extract the system slug from the bug's metadata
2. Grep `tests/unit/[system]/` and `tests/integration/[system]/` for a test
that references the bug ID or the specific failure scenario
3. Assign:
- **HAS REGRESSION TEST** — a test was found that would catch this bug
- **MISSING REGRESSION TEST** — bug was fixed but no test guards against recurrence
For MISSING REGRESSION TEST items:
- Flag them as regression gaps
- Suggest the test file path: `tests/unit/[system]/[bug-slug]_regression_test.[ext]`
- Note: "Without this test, this bug can silently return in a future sprint."
---
## 5. Detect Coverage Drift
Coverage drift occurs when the game grows but the regression suite doesn't.
Check for drift indicators:
- Stories completed this sprint with no corresponding test files in `tests/`
- New systems added to `systems-index.md` since the last regression-suite update
- GDD sections added or revised since the regression suite was last updated
(use Grep on GDD file modification hints if available, or ask the user)
- `tests/regression-suite.md` last-updated date vs. current date — if gap >
2 sprints, flag as likely stale
---
## 6. Generate Report and Suite Manifest
### Report format (in conversation)
```
## Regression Suite Status
**Mode**: [update | audit | report]
**Existing registered tests**: [N]
**Test files scanned**: [N]
### Critical Path Coverage (audit mode only)
| System | Total ACs | Covered | Partial | Missing | Exempt |
|--------|-----------|---------|---------|---------|--------|
| [name] | [N] | [N] | [N] | [N] | [N] |
**Coverage rate (non-exempt)**: [N]%
### Bug Regression Coverage
| Bug ID | System | Severity | Has Regression Test? |
|--------|--------|----------|----------------------|
| BUG-NNN | [system] | S[N] | YES / NO ⚠ |
**Bugs without regression tests**: [N]
### Coverage Drift Indicators
[List new systems or stories with no test coverage, or "None detected."]
### Recommended New Regression Tests
| Priority | System | Suggested Test File | Covers |
|----------|--------|---------------------|--------|
| HIGH | [system] | `tests/unit/[system]/[slug]_regression_test.[ext]` | BUG-NNN / AC-[N] |
| MEDIUM | [system] | `tests/unit/[system]/[slug]_test.[ext]` | [criterion] |
```
### Suite manifest format (`tests/regression-suite.md`)
The manifest is a curated index — not the tests themselves, but a registry
of which tests should always pass before a release:
```markdown
# Regression Suite Manifest
> Last Updated: [date]
> Total registered tests: [N]
> Coverage: [N]% of GDD critical paths
## How to run
[Engine-specific command to run all regression tests]
## Registered Regression Tests
### [System Name]
| Test File | Test Function (if known) | Covers | Added |
|-----------|--------------------------|--------|-------|
| `tests/unit/[system]/[file]_test.[ext]` | `test_[scenario]` | AC-N / BUG-NNN | [date] |
## Known Gaps
Tests that should exist but don't yet:
| Priority | System | Suggested Path | Covers | Reason Not Yet Written |
|----------|--------|----------------|--------|------------------------|
| HIGH | [system] | `tests/unit/[system]/[path]` | BUG-NNN | Bug fixed without test |
## Quarantined Tests
Tests that are flaky or disabled (do not run in CI):
| Test File | Function | Reason | Quarantined Since |
|-----------|----------|--------|-------------------|
| (none) | | | |
```
---
## 7. Write Output
Ask: "May I write/update `tests/regression-suite.md` with the current
regression suite manifest?"
For `update` mode: append new entries; never remove existing entries
(use `Edit` with targeted insertions).
For `audit` mode: rewrite the full manifest with updated coverage data.
For `report` mode: do not write anything.
After writing (if approved):
- For each HIGH priority gap: "Consider creating the missing regression test
before the next sprint. Run `/test-helpers` to scaffold the test file."
- If bug regression gaps > 0: "These bugs can silently return without regression
tests. The next sprint should include a story to write the missing tests."
- If coverage drift detected: "Regression suite may be drifting. Consider
running `/regression-suite audit` at the next sprint boundary."
Verdict: **COMPLETE** — regression suite updated. (If user declined write: Verdict: **BLOCKED**.)
---
## Collaborative Protocol
- **Never remove existing regression tests from the manifest** without
explicit user approval — removing a test that was deliberately written is a
regression risk itself
- **Gaps are advisory, not blocking** — surface them clearly but do not prevent
other work from proceeding (except at release gate where regression suite is required)
- **Quarantine is not deletion** — tests with intermittent failures should be
quarantined (noted in manifest) but not removed; they should be fixed by
`/test-flakiness`
- **Ask before writing** — always confirm before creating or updating the manifestMore Debugging skills
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
explore-code
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill for auditable candidate implementation in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory work on an isolated branch or worktree to transplant modules, adapt a backbone, add LoRA or adapter layers, replace a head, or stitch together meaningful low-risk migration ideas with rollback-aware records in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted baseline reproduction, conservative debugging, environment setup, verified contribution claims, or default repository analysis.
safe-debug
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit skill for deep learning research work. Use when the user pastes a traceback, terminal error, CUDA OOM, checkpoint load failure, shape mismatch, NaN loss symptom, or training failure and wants conservative diagnosis before any patching, with debug fixes clearly separated from research contributions. Do not use for broad refactoring, speculative adaptation, automatic exploratory patching, or general repository familiarization.

