kotlin-coroutines
Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging coroutine code in Kotlin — including dispatcher selection, scope management, structured concurrency, cancellation, exception handling, or async patterns in Android or KMP projects.
Works with
---
name: kotlin-coroutines
description: Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging coroutine code in Kotlin — including dispatcher selection, scope management, structured concurrency, cancellation, exception handling, or async patterns in Android or KMP projects.
license: MIT
---
# Kotlin Coroutines
Built on **structured concurrency**: every coroutine runs in a scope; cancellation and errors propagate through the parent–child hierarchy. This reference focuses on the two disciplines most often gotten wrong: **who owns the scope**, and **exception handling that doesn't break cancellation**.
**Main-safety:** the function doing blocking work owns the `withContext(ioDispatcher)`; callers never switch dispatchers before calling a suspend function.
## Scope ownership — prefer `suspend fun`, let the caller own the scope
A stored `CoroutineScope` on a non-UI class (repository, manager, use case, data source) is a strong review signal: the class would have to prove it owns cancellation, error reporting, restart, and lifecycle — most can't. The fix is almost always **make the API `suspend` and let the caller own the scope.**
```kotlin
// DO — suspend fun; the caller owns the scope, cancellation propagates, exceptions surface
class ArticlesRepository(private val dataSource: ArticlesDataSource, private val io: CoroutineDispatcher) {
suspend fun bookmark(article: Article) = withContext(io) { dataSource.bookmark(article) }
}
class BookmarkViewModel(private val repo: ArticlesRepository) : ViewModel() {
fun onBookmark(a: Article) { viewModelScope.launch { repo.bookmark(a) } }
}
// DO NOT — store a scope and launch inside the repository
class ArticlesRepository(private val externalScope: CoroutineScope, /* ... */) {
suspend fun bookmark(a: Article) { externalScope.launch { dataSource.bookmark(a) }.join() }
}
```
**Why stored scopes are dangerous:** once that scope is cancelled, every future `launch` on it completes silently as cancelled — no exception, no log. If the cancellation came from process death or a misconfigured DI graph, the class keeps accepting calls and silently does nothing.
### When work must outlive the caller
A write that must survive the user navigating away doesn't belong to the repository — it belongs to a `WorkManager` job, or a **named** application-scoped class that deliberately owns its scope (an `OfflineBookmarkQueue` with an injected `applicationScope`, cancelled only on process death). The named class makes the lifetime explicit, testable, and observable — unlike a buried `externalScope.launch`.
### State-holder carve-out — when `launch` from a non-suspending method is OK
A UI state holder may launch from a non-suspending event callback only under **all three**: (1) it actually owns UI state the view layer collects; (2) it uses a lifecycle-bound scope (`viewModelScope` / `rememberCoroutineScope`); (3) the trigger is a UI event (click, swipe, lifecycle) — not a repository call, background timer, or DI hook. If any fails, expose a `suspend fun` and let the real state holder own the scope.
### Anti-patterns: `init { launch }` and DI-singleton `launch`
`init { viewModelScope.launch { while (isActive) { … } } }` makes the work invisible — no named trigger, no restart path, and a nav back/forward silently re-launches it. Expose a `StateFlow` via `stateIn` instead. Likewise a `@Singleton` (or a Hilt `Initializer`) that launches from its constructor starts coroutines "wherever DI realizes me," observable by no one — use `WorkManager.enqueueUniquePeriodicWork`, invert the work into the consumer, or put it in a named class with an explicit `startX()` method.
**Diagnostic** for any DI-bound or stored-scope launch: *where is the start moment defined? who can observe whether it's running? can it be restarted without restarting the process?* Answers of *"wherever / no one / no"* mean refactor.
## Cancellation
Cooperative: `ensureActive()` at the top of long loops (throws if cancelled), `isActive` to check without throwing, `yield()` to also yield the thread. `delay` / `withContext` are already cancellable. Cleanup that must run after cancellation goes in `finally { withContext(NonCancellable) { … } }` — `NonCancellable` only there, never as a general escape hatch. `TimeoutCancellationException` (from `withTimeout`) **is** a `CancellationException` — never catch it without rethrowing. (Don't reach for `withTimeout` for network timeouts — OkHttp/Retrofit/Ktor own those.)
## Exception handling — don't break cancellation
```kotlin
// DO — specific types
try { repo.login(u, p) } catch (e: IOException) { _state.value = Error("Network") }
// DO NOT — catch (e: Exception) / Throwable swallows CancellationException and breaks structured cancellation
```
- Catch **specific** types (`IOException`, `HttpException`), never `Exception` / `Throwable`.
- **Never** catch `CancellationException` without rethrowing it.
- **Never** `runCatching` in a suspend function — it catches `CancellationException`. Use a `suspendRunCatching` that rethrows it:
```kotlin
suspend inline fun <R> suspendRunCatching(block: () -> R): Result<R> = try {
Result.success(block())
} catch (e: CancellationException) { throw e } catch (e: Throwable) { Result.failure(e) }
```
- `try/catch` doesn't wrap `launch {}` — put it inside the coroutine body.
- An unawaited `async {}` in a `supervisorScope` swallows its exception — use `launch` if you don't need the result.
- `viewModelScope` already uses `SupervisorJob` — don't add another alongside it.
## KMP
Don't use `MainScope()` — it's unstructured (`Dispatchers.Main + SupervisorJob()`), with the same problems as `GlobalScope`. Inject a lifecycle-bound `CoroutineScope` from the platform layer (`viewModelScope` on Android; a view-controller-bound scope on iOS). Inject `CoroutineDispatcher` for platform implementations; `expect`/`actual` `Dispatchers.Main.immediate` if a target lacks it.
## Testing
Coroutine and dispatcher testing lives in `android-skills:android-testing` — notably the two-schedulers trap (`runTest` + `MainDispatcherRule` must share one scheduler) and the `StandardTestDispatcher` default in Compose tests.More Debugging skills
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
explore-code
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill for auditable candidate implementation in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory work on an isolated branch or worktree to transplant modules, adapt a backbone, add LoRA or adapter layers, replace a head, or stitch together meaningful low-risk migration ideas with rollback-aware records in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted baseline reproduction, conservative debugging, environment setup, verified contribution claims, or default repository analysis.
safe-debug
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit skill for deep learning research work. Use when the user pastes a traceback, terminal error, CUDA OOM, checkpoint load failure, shape mismatch, NaN loss symptom, or training failure and wants conservative diagnosis before any patching, with debug fixes clearly separated from research contributions. Do not use for broad refactoring, speculative adaptation, automatic exploratory patching, or general repository familiarization.

