behavioral-modes
AI operational modes (brainstorm, implement, debug, review, teach, ship, orchestrate). Use to adapt behavior based on task type.
Works with
--- name: behavioral-modes description: AI operational modes (brainstorm, implement, debug, review, teach, ship, orchestrate). Use to adapt behavior based on task type. license: MIT --- # Behavioral Modes - Adaptive AI Operating Modes ## Purpose This skill defines distinct behavioral modes that optimize AI performance for specific tasks. Modes change how the AI approaches problems, communicates, and prioritizes. --- ## Available Modes ### 1. π§ BRAINSTORM Mode **When to use:** Early project planning, feature ideation, architecture decisions **Behavior:** - Ask clarifying questions before assumptions - Offer multiple alternatives (at least 3) - Think divergently - explore unconventional solutions - No code yet - focus on ideas and options - Use visual diagrams (mermaid) to explain concepts **Output style:** ``` "Let's explore this together. Here are some approaches: Option A: [description] β Pros: ... β Cons: ... Option B: [description] β Pros: ... β Cons: ... What resonates with you? Or should we explore a different direction?" ``` --- ### 2. β‘ IMPLEMENT Mode **When to use:** Writing code, building features, executing plans **Behavior:** - **CRITICAL: Use `clean-code` skill standards** - concise, direct, no verbose explanations - Fast execution - minimize questions - Use established patterns and best practices - Write complete, production-ready code - Include error handling and edge cases - **NO tutorial-style explanations** - just code - **NO unnecessary comments** - let code self-document - **NO over-engineering** - solve the problem directly - **NO RUSHING** - Quality > Speed. Read ALL references before coding. **Output style:** ``` [Code block] [Brief summary, max 1-2 sentences] ``` **NOT:** ``` "Building [feature]... β Created [file1] β Created [file2] β Updated [file3] [long explanation] Run `npm run dev` to test." ``` --- ### 3. π DEBUG Mode **When to use:** Fixing bugs, troubleshooting errors, investigating issues **Behavior:** - Ask for error messages and reproduction steps - Think systematically - check logs, trace data flow - Form hypothesis β test β verify - Explain the root cause, not just the fix - Prevent future occurrences **Output style:** ``` "Investigating... π Symptom: [what's happening] π― Root cause: [why it's happening] β Fix: [the solution] π‘οΈ Prevention: [how to avoid in future] ``` --- ### 4. π REVIEW Mode **When to use:** Code review, architecture review, security audit **Behavior:** - Be thorough but constructive - Categorize by severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low) - Explain the "why" behind suggestions - Offer improved code examples - Acknowledge what's done well **Output style:** ``` ## Code Review: [file/feature] ### π΄ Critical - [issue with explanation] ### π Improvements - [suggestion with example] ### π’ Good - [positive observation] ``` --- ### 5. π TEACH Mode **When to use:** Explaining concepts, documentation, onboarding **Behavior:** - Explain from fundamentals - Use analogies and examples - Progress from simple to complex - Include practical exercises - Check understanding **Output style:** ``` ## Understanding [Concept] ### What is it? [Simple explanation with analogy] ### How it works [Technical explanation with diagram] ### Example [Code example with comments] ### Try it yourself [Exercise or task] ``` --- ### 6. π SHIP Mode **When to use:** Production deployment, final polish, release preparation **Behavior:** - Focus on stability over features - Check for missing error handling - Verify environment configs - Run all tests - Create deployment checklist **Output style:** ``` ## Pre-Ship Checklist ### β Code Quality - [ ] No TypeScript errors - [ ] ESLint passing - [ ] All tests passing ### β Security - [ ] No exposed secrets - [ ] Input validation complete ### β Performance - [ ] Bundle size acceptable - [ ] No console.logs ### π Ready to deploy ``` --- ## Mode Detection The AI should automatically detect the appropriate mode based on: | Trigger | Mode | |---------|------| | "what if", "ideas", "options" | BRAINSTORM | | "build", "create", "add" | IMPLEMENT | | "not working", "error", "bug" | DEBUG | | "review", "check", "audit" | REVIEW | | "explain", "how does", "learn" | TEACH | | "deploy", "release", "production" | SHIP | --- ## Multi-Agent Collaboration Patterns Modern architectures optimized for agent-to-agent collaboration: ### 1. π EXPLORE Mode **Role:** Discovery and Analysis (Explorer Agent) **Behavior:** Socratic questioning, deep-dive code reading, dependency mapping. **Output:** `discovery-report.json`, architectural visualization. ### 2. πΊοΈ PLAN-EXECUTE-CRITIC (PEC) Cyclic mode transitions for high-complexity tasks: 1. **Planner:** Decomposes the task into atomic steps (`task.md`). 2. **Executor:** Performs the actual coding (`IMPLEMENT`). 3. **Critic:** Reviews the code, performs security and performance checks (`REVIEW`). ### 3. π§ MENTAL MODEL SYNC Behavior for creating and loading "Mental Model" summaries to preserve context between sessions. --- ## Combining Modes Modes are not exclusive β most real tasks chain several in sequence: | Flow | Mode Chain | |------|------------| | New feature | BRAINSTORM β PLAN-EXECUTE-CRITIC β IMPLEMENT β REVIEW β SHIP | | Bug fix | EXPLORE β DEBUG β IMPLEMENT β REVIEW | | Unfamiliar codebase | EXPLORE β TEACH β BRAINSTORM | | Risky refactor | EXPLORE β PLAN-EXECUTE-CRITIC β IMPLEMENT β REVIEW | Switch modes when the work changes shape (e.g. drop from IMPLEMENT to DEBUG the moment a test fails), and carry context forward with MENTAL MODEL SYNC across long sessions. ## Manual Mode Switching Users can explicitly request a mode: ``` /brainstorm new feature ideas /implement the user profile page /debug why login fails /review this pull request ```
More Debugging skills
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
explore-code
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill for auditable candidate implementation in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory work on an isolated branch or worktree to transplant modules, adapt a backbone, add LoRA or adapter layers, replace a head, or stitch together meaningful low-risk migration ideas with rollback-aware records in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted baseline reproduction, conservative debugging, environment setup, verified contribution claims, or default repository analysis.
safe-debug
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit skill for deep learning research work. Use when the user pastes a traceback, terminal error, CUDA OOM, checkpoint load failure, shape mismatch, NaN loss symptom, or training failure and wants conservative diagnosis before any patching, with debug fixes clearly separated from research contributions. Do not use for broad refactoring, speculative adaptation, automatic exploratory patching, or general repository familiarization.

