agentforce-observe
Analyze production Agentforce agent behavior using session traces and Data Cloud. TRIGGER when: user queries STDM session data or Data Cloud trace records; investigates production agent failures, regressions, or performance issues; asks about session traces, conversation logs, or agent metrics; wants to reproduce a reported production issue in preview; runs findSessions or trace analysis queries. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user creates, modifies, or debugs .agent files during development (use agentforce-generate); writes or runs test specs (use agentforce-test); uses sf agent preview for local development iteration; deploys or publishes agents.
Works with
---
name: agentforce-observe
description: Analyze production Agentforce agent behavior using session traces and Data Cloud. TRIGGER when: user queries STDM session data or Data Cloud trace records; investigates production agent failures, regressions, or performance issues; asks about session traces, conversation logs, or agent metrics; wants to reproduce a reported production issue in preview; runs findSessions or trace analysis queries. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user creates, modifies, or debugs .agent files during development (use agentforce-generate); writes or runs test specs (use agentforce-test); uses sf agent preview for local development iteration; deploys or publishes agents.
license: Apache-2.0
---
# Agentforce Observability
Improve Agentforce agents using session trace data and live preview testing.
**Three-phase workflow:**
- **Observe** -- Query STDM sessions from Data Cloud (if available), OR run test suites + preview with local traces as fallback
- **Reproduce** -- Use `sf agent preview` to simulate problematic conversations live
- **Improve** -- Edit the `.agent` file directly, validate, publish, verify
---
## Platform Notes
- Shell examples below use bash syntax. On Windows, use PowerShell equivalents or Git Bash.
- Replace `python3` with `python` on Windows.
- Replace `/tmp/` with `$env:TEMP\` (PowerShell) or `%TEMP%\` (cmd).
- Replace `jq` with `python -c "import json,sys; ..."` if jq is not installed.
---
## Routing
Gather these inputs before starting:
- **Org alias** (required)
- **Agent API name** (required for preview and deploy; ask if not provided)
- **Agent file path** (optional) -- path to the `.agent` file, typically `force-app/main/default/aiAuthoringBundles/<AgentName>/<AgentName>.agent`. Auto-detect if not provided.
- **Session IDs** (optional) -- analyze specific sessions; if absent, query last 7 days
- **Days to look back** (optional, default 7)
Determine intent from user input:
- **No specific action** -> run all three phases: Observe -> surface issues -> ask if user wants to Reproduce and/or Improve
- **"analyze" / "sessions" / "what's wrong"** -> Phase 1 only, then suggest next steps
- **"reproduce" / "test" / "preview"** -> Phase 2 (run Phase 1 first if no issues in hand)
- **"fix" / "improve" / "update"** -> Phase 3 (run Phase 1 first if no issues in hand)
### Resolve agent name
Before any STDM query, resolve the user-provided agent name against the org to get the exact `MasterLabel` and `DeveloperName`:
```bash
sf data query --json \
--query "SELECT Id, MasterLabel, DeveloperName FROM GenAiPlannerDefinition WHERE MasterLabel LIKE '%<user-provided-name>%' OR DeveloperName LIKE '%<user-provided-name>%'" \
-o <org>
```
- `MasterLabel` = display name used by STDM `findSessions` and Agent Builder UI (e.g. "Order Service")
- `DeveloperName` = API name with version suffix used in metadata (e.g. "OrderService_v9")
- The `--api-name` flag for `sf agent preview/activate/publish` uses `DeveloperName` **without** the `_vN` suffix (e.g. "OrderService")
Store these values:
- `AGENT_MASTER_LABEL` -- for `findSessions()` agent filter
- `AGENT_API_NAME` -- `DeveloperName` without `_vN` suffix, for `sf agent` CLI commands
- `PLANNER_ID` -- the Salesforce record ID for this agent
### Locate the .agent file
**Step 1 -- Search locally:**
```bash
find <project-root>/force-app/main/default/aiAuthoringBundles -name "*.agent" 2>/dev/null
```
If the user provided an agent file path, use that directly. Otherwise, search for files matching `AGENT_API_NAME`.
**Step 2 -- If not found locally, retrieve from the org:**
```bash
sf project retrieve start --json --metadata "AiAuthoringBundle:<AGENT_API_NAME>" -o <org>
```
> **Known bug:** `sf project retrieve start` creates a double-nested path: `force-app/main/default/main/default/aiAuthoringBundles/...`. Fix it immediately after retrieve:
```bash
if [ -d "force-app/main/default/main/default/aiAuthoringBundles" ]; then
mkdir -p force-app/main/default/aiAuthoringBundles
cp -r force-app/main/default/main/default/aiAuthoringBundles/* \
force-app/main/default/aiAuthoringBundles/
rm -rf force-app/main/default/main
fi
```
**Step 3 -- Validate the retrieved file:**
Read the `.agent` file and verify it has proper Agent Script structure:
- `system:` block with `instructions:`
- `config:` block with `developer_name:`
- `start_agent` or `subagent` blocks with `reasoning: instructions:`
- Each subagent should have distinct `instructions:` content (not identical across subagents)
Store the resolved path as `AGENT_FILE` for Phase 3.
---
## Phase 0: Discover Data Space
Before running any STDM query, determine the correct Data Cloud Data Space API name.
```bash
sf api request rest "/services/data/v63.0/ssot/data-spaces" -o <org>
```
Note: `sf api request rest` is a beta command -- do not add `--json` (that flag is unsupported and causes an error).
The response shape is:
```json
{
"dataSpaces": [
{
"id": "0vhKh000000g3DjIAI",
"label": "default",
"name": "default",
"status": "Active",
"description": "Your org's default data space."
}
],
"totalSize": 1
}
```
The `name` field is the API name to pass to `AgentforceOptimizeService`.
**Decision logic:**
- If the command fails (e.g. 404 or permission error), fall back to `'default'` and note it as an assumption.
- Filter to only `status: "Active"` entries.
- If exactly one active Data Space exists, use it automatically and confirm to the user: "Using Data Space: `<name>`".
- If multiple active Data Spaces exist, show the list (label + name) and ask the user which to use.
Store the selected `name` value as `DATA_SPACE` for all subsequent steps.
### Prerequisite check: STDM DMOs
After deploying the helper class (step 1.0), run a quick probe to verify the STDM Data Model Objects exist in Data Cloud:
```bash
sf apex run -o <org> -f /dev/stdin << 'APEX'
ConnectApi.CdpQueryInput qi = new ConnectApi.CdpQueryInput();
qi.sql = 'SELECT ssot__Id__c FROM "ssot__AiAgentSession__dlm" LIMIT 1';
try {
ConnectApi.CdpQueryOutputV2 out = ConnectApi.CdpQuery.queryAnsiSqlV2(qi, '<DATA_SPACE>');
System.debug('STDM_CHECK:OK rows=' + (out.data != null ? out.data.size() : 0));
} catch (Exception e) {
System.debug('STDM_CHECK:FAIL ' + e.getMessage());
}
APEX
```
**If `STDM_CHECK:FAIL`:** STDM is not activated. Inform the user and switch to **Phase 1-ALT**:
> STDM (Session Trace Data Model) is not available in this org. To enable: Setup -> Data Cloud -> Data Streams and verify "Agentforce Activity" is active. **Proceeding with fallback: test suites + local traces.**
**If `STDM_CHECK:OK`**, proceed to Phase 1 (STDM path).
---
## Phase 1-ALT: Observe Without STDM (Fallback Path)
When STDM is not available, use test suites and `sf agent preview --authoring-bundle` with local trace analysis.
| Data source | When to use | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| STDM (Phase 1) | Historical production analysis | Real user data, volume | Requires Data Cloud, 15-min lag |
| Test suites + local traces (Phase 1-ALT) | Dev iteration, orgs without STDM | Instant, full LLM prompt, variable state | Preview only, no real user data |
### 1-ALT.1 Run existing test suite (if available)
```bash
sf agent test list --json -o <org>
sf agent test run --json --api-name <TestSuiteName> --wait 10 --result-format json -o <org> | tee /tmp/test_run.json
JOB_ID=$(python3 -c "import json; print(json.load(open('/tmp/test_run.json'))['result']['runId'])")
sf agent test results --json --job-id "$JOB_ID" --result-format json -o <org>
```
### 1-ALT.2 Derive test utterances from .agent file (if no test suite)
If no test suite exists, derive utterances: one per non-entry subagent (from `description:` keywords), one per key action, one guardrail test, one multi-turn test.
### 1-ALT.3 Preview with `--authoring-bundle` (local traces)
Run each test utterance through preview to generate local trace files:
```bash
sf agent preview start --json --authoring-bundle <BundleName> --simulate-actions -o <org> | tee /tmp/preview_start.json
SESSION_ID=$(python3 -c "import json; print(json.load(open('/tmp/preview_start.json'))['result']['sessionId'])")
sf agent preview send --json --session-id "$SESSION_ID" --authoring-bundle <BundleName> \
--utterance "$UTT" -o <org> | tee /tmp/preview_response.json
sf agent preview end --json --session-id "$SESSION_ID" --authoring-bundle <BundleName> -o <org>
```
**Trace file location:** `.sfdx/agents/{BundleName}/sessions/{sessionId}/traces/{planId}.json`
### 1-ALT.4 Local trace diagnosis
| Issue type | Trace command |
|---|---|
| Subagent misroute | `jq -r '.plan[] \| select(.type=="NodeEntryStateStep") \| .data.agent_name' "$TRACE"` |
| Action not called | `jq -r '.plan[] \| select(.type=="EnabledToolsStep") \| .data.enabled_tools[]' "$TRACE"` |
| LOW adherence | `jq -r '.plan[] \| select(.type=="ReasoningStep") \| {category, reason}' "$TRACE"` |
| Variable capture fail | `jq -r '.plan[] \| select(.type=="VariableUpdateStep") \| .data.variable_updates[]' "$TRACE"` |
| Vague instructions | `jq -r '.plan[] \| select(.type=="LLMStep") \| .data.messages_sent[0].content' "$TRACE"` |
**DefaultTopic trace quirk:** With `--authoring-bundle`, the root `.topic` field often shows `"DefaultTopic"` even when routing works. Always use `NodeEntryStateStep.data.agent_name` for the real subagent chain.
**Entry answering directly (SMALL_TALK pattern):** If `start_agent` trace shows `SMALL_TALK` grounding and transition tools visible but none invoked, add "You are a router only. Do NOT answer questions directly." to `start_agent` instructions.
### 1-ALT.5 Classify and present
Classify issues using the categories in `references/issue-classification.md`. After presenting findings, automatically proceed to agent config evidence analysis.
---
## Phase 1: Observe -- Query STDM
> Full STDM query details, Apex service deployment, and response parsing: see `references/stdm-queries.md`
### 1.0 Deploy helper class (once per org)
Deploy `AgentforceOptimizeService` Apex class to the org. Check if already deployed first:
```bash
sf data query --json --query "SELECT Id, Name FROM ApexClass WHERE Name = 'AgentforceOptimizeService'" -o <org>
```
If not deployed, copy from skill directory and deploy. See `references/stdm-queries.md` for full steps.
### 1.1 Find sessions
Query recent sessions using `findSessions()`. Parse `DEBUG|STDM_RESULT:` from the Apex debug log. If `findSessions` returns empty, switch to Phase 1-ALT.
### 1.2 Get conversation details
Use `getMultipleConversationDetails()` for up to 5 sessions (most recent first). Returns turn-by-turn data with messages, steps, topics, and action results.
### 1.2b Get LLM prompt/response (optional)
When LOW adherence detected, use `getLlmStepDetails()` to get the actual LLM prompt and response.
### 1.2c Get aggregated metrics (recommended first step)
Use `getAggregatedMetrics()` for high-level health dashboard: session rates, top intents, quality distribution, RAG averages.
### 1.2d Get moment insights (per-session detail)
Use `getMomentInsights()` for intent summaries, quality scores (1-5), and retriever metrics per session.
### 1.2e Run observability queries (RAG deep-dive)
Use `runObservabilityQuery()` for targeted RAG analysis: KnowledgeGap, Hallucination, RetrievalQuality, AnswerRelevancy, Leaderboard.
### 1.3 Reconstruct conversations
Render turn-by-turn timeline from `ConversationData` JSON for each session.
### 1.4 Identify issues
> Full issue pattern table and classification categories: see `references/issue-classification.md`
Check each session for: action errors, subagent misroutes, missing actions, wrong inputs, variable capture failures, no transitions, slow actions, LOW adherence, abandoned sessions, dead subagents, publish drift, dead hub anti-pattern, entry answering directly, and safety issues.
**Voice agents (has `modality voice:` block):** Also check for:
- Response verbosity — flag any agent response over 3 sentences (voice UX anti-pattern; also a silence/nudge-timer trigger)
- Visual formatting in responses — lists, links, markdown that don't render in speech
- Missing confirmation patterns — actions modifying data without repeating back key details
- Missing voice wiring — voice agent lacks a `VoiceCallId` linked variable (`@VoiceCall.Id`) or the `connection customer_web_client:` block, or someone added a non-existent `connection voice:` block
- **Latency anti-patterns** — cross-reference trace step durations against the field-verified patterns in `/agentforce-generate` [`references/voice-latency-heuristics.md`](../agentforce-generate/references/voice-latency-heuristics.md): synchronous writes on the live-call path, bulky retrieval returned raw to the reasoning LLM, chained external callouts, over-decomposed subagent routing, and slow actions with no ack phrase. Latency fixes are **flag-only** unless purely instructional (ack phrase, turn-length, spoken-form rule).
- **TTS garble / missing spoken-form rule** — action outputs or responses that surface prices, phone numbers, or IDs without a spoken-form instruction rule.
Priority: P1 = action errors, misroutes, LOW adherence; P2 = missing actions, variable bugs, knowledge gaps; P3 = performance, abandoned sessions, voice UX issues, voice latency anti-patterns.
### 1.5 Present findings and agent config evidence
Present sessions analyzed, issues grouped by root cause category, and uplift estimate. Then automatically proceed to analyze the `.agent` file to confirm root causes.
> Full structural analysis checks, cross-reference procedures, and publish drift detection: see `references/issue-classification.md`
Retrieve the `.agent` file from the org, run automated checks (subagent count vs action blocks, dead hub detection, orphan actions, cross-subagent variable dependencies), and cross-reference STDM symptoms against the file structure.
---
## Phase 2: Reproduce -- Live Preview
> Full preview procedures, trace diagnosis commands, and classification criteria: see `references/reproduce-reference.md`
Build one test scenario per confirmed issue from Phase 1. Run each through `sf agent preview` with `--authoring-bundle` (generates local traces). Run each scenario **3 times** and classify:
| Verdict | Criteria |
|---|---|
| `[CONFIRMED]` | Same failure in 3/3 runs |
| `[INTERMITTENT]` | Failure in 1-2 of 3 runs |
| `[NOT REPRODUCED]` | Passes in 3/3 runs |
Only `[CONFIRMED]` and `[INTERMITTENT]` issues proceed to Phase 3.
**Key commands:**
```bash
sf agent preview start --json --authoring-bundle <Name> --simulate-actions -o <org>
sf agent preview send --json --session-id "$SID" --utterance "<text>" --authoring-bundle <Name> -o <org>
sf agent preview end --json --session-id "$SID" --authoring-bundle <Name> -o <org>
```
Run these from the Salesforce project directory. `start` requires an action mode with `--authoring-bundle` (`--simulate-actions` or `--use-live-actions`); that flag is rejected by `send` and `end`.
**Trace location:** `.sfdx/agents/{Name}/sessions/{sessionId}/traces/{planId}.json`
---
## Phase 3: Improve -- Edit .agent File Directly
> Full procedures for pre-flight checks, fix mapping, instruction principles, regression prevention, deployment chain, verification, safety re-verification, and test case creation: see `references/improve-reference.md`
### 3.0 Pre-flight
Verify all action targets exist and are registered in the org before editing. If targets are missing, present options: deploy stubs, remove actions, register via UI, or proceed with routing-only fixes.
### 3.1-3.3 Map issue, edit, and follow instruction principles
Map each confirmed issue to a fix location in the `.agent` file (description, instructions, actions, bindings, transitions). Use the Edit tool for targeted changes. Follow instruction principles: name actions explicitly, state pre-conditions, scope tightly, keep persona in `system:` only.
### 3.4 Regression prevention
Establish baseline before editing. Make minimal edits. Test immediately after each edit. One fix per publish cycle. Check cross-subagent dependencies. Test adjacent subagents.
### 3.5 Apply fixes
Read the `.agent` file, edit with the Edit tool, and show the diff. Preserve the
file's existing structural indentation for a surgical edit so you do not create a
mixed-style file. Generate new files with 4 spaces. If normalization is needed,
convert the entire structural indentation as a separate change and validate it;
do not partially convert a tab-indented file.
### 3.6 Validate, deploy, publish, activate
```bash
# Validate (dry run)
sf agent validate authoring-bundle --json --api-name <AGENT_API_NAME> -o <org>
# Publish (compile + deploy + activate)
sf agent publish authoring-bundle --json --api-name <AGENT_API_NAME> -o <org>
```
If publish fails, use deploy + activate fallback (note: incomplete -- does not propagate `reasoning: actions:` to live metadata).
### 3.7 Verify
Run Phase 2 scenarios post-fix. Check trace for correct routing, grounding, tools, and variables. After 24-48 hours, re-run Phase 1 to compare against baseline.
### 3.7b Safety re-verification (required)
Re-run safety review (`Section 15 of /agentforce-generate`) on the modified `.agent` file. Revert any changes that introduce BLOCK findings.
### 3.8 Update Testing Center test cases
Create regression test cases from confirmed issues in Testing Center YAML format. Deploy with `sf agent test create` and verify all previously-broken scenarios pass.
---
## Reference Files
| Reference | Contents |
|---|---|
| `references/stdm-queries.md` | STDM query procedures, Apex service deployment, response parsing |
| `references/issue-classification.md` | Issue pattern table, root cause categories, structural analysis checks |
| `references/reproduce-reference.md` | Phase 2 preview procedures, trace diagnosis, classification criteria |
| `references/improve-reference.md` | Phase 3 editing, deployment chain, verification, safety, test cases |
| `references/stdm-schema.md` | DMO field schemas, data hierarchy, quality notes, agent name resolution |More Debugging skills
diagnosing-bugs
mattpocock/skills
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
explore-code
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Improve implementation leaf skill for auditable candidate implementation in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory work on an isolated branch or worktree to transplant modules, adapt a backbone, add LoRA or adapter layers, replace a head, or stitch together meaningful low-risk migration ideas with rollback-aware records in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted baseline reproduction, conservative debugging, environment setup, verified contribution claims, or default repository analysis.
safe-debug
lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Rigor Debug / Rigor Audit skill for deep learning research work. Use when the user pastes a traceback, terminal error, CUDA OOM, checkpoint load failure, shape mismatch, NaN loss symptom, or training failure and wants conservative diagnosis before any patching, with debug fixes clearly separated from research contributions. Do not use for broad refactoring, speculative adaptation, automatic exploratory patching, or general repository familiarization.

