review-remix-v2

Comprehensive Remix v2 code review with per-area review skills, run in parallel where the agent supports subagents and sequentially otherwise. Detects Remix v2 in package.json, loads relevant review skills, runs verification protocol.

existential-birds/beagle32 installsApache-2.0Synced Aug 26

Works with

Claude CodeCursorCodex CLIGitHub CopilotGemini CLI
---
name: review-remix-v2
description: Comprehensive Remix v2 code review with per-area review skills, run in parallel where the agent supports subagents and sequentially otherwise. Detects Remix v2 in package.json, loads relevant review skills, runs verification protocol.
license: Apache-2.0
---

# Remix v2 Code Review

## Arguments

- `--parallel`: Hint to fan out per technology area when the agent supports subagents (see Step 5). When unsupported, the review runs sequentially with identical output.
- Path: Target directory (default: current working directory)

## Step 1: Identify Changed Files

```bash
git diff --name-only $(git merge-base HEAD main)..HEAD | grep -E '\.(tsx?|jsx?|mjs|cjs|css)$|^(remix|vite)\.config\.'
```

If nothing is returned, ask the user for an explicit path list before continuing.

## Step 2: Detect Remix v2 + Techs

```bash
# Detect Remix v2 in package.json (any official adapter)
grep -E '"@remix-run/(react|node|cloudflare|deno|serve)"' package.json | head -3

# Confirm app router layout
ls app/routes/ 2>/dev/null | head -5

# meta exports (route metadata)
grep -rE 'export const meta|export function meta|export let meta' app/ --include="*.tsx" --include="*.ts" -l | head -3

# Sessions / cookies / auth
grep -rE 'createCookieSessionStorage|getSession\(|commitSession\(|destroySession\(' app/ --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" -l | head -3

# Form primitives (forms-review)
grep -rE 'useFetcher\(|<Form|useSubmit\(|useNavigation\(' app/ --include="*.tsx" -l | head -3

# Form anti-patterns: native form / manual fetch (forms-review trigger even without Remix imports)
grep -rE '(^|[^.])<form |fetch\(' app/ --include="*.tsx" -l | head -3

# Error boundaries
grep -rE 'export function ErrorBoundary|export const ErrorBoundary|useRouteError|isRouteErrorResponse' app/ --include="*.tsx" -l | head -3

# Headers / streaming / server-only modules
grep -rE 'export const headers|export function headers|defer\(' app/ --include="*.tsx" --include="*.ts" -l | head -3
find app -type f \( -name '*.server.ts' -o -name '*.server.tsx' -o -name '*.client.ts' -o -name '*.client.tsx' \) | head -5

# Prefetch hygiene (perf-ssr-review)
grep -rE 'prefetch=|<PrefetchPageLinks' app/ --include="*.tsx" -l | head -3

# Loaders / actions (data flow)
grep -rE 'export (async )?function (loader|action)|export const (loader|action)' app/ --include="*.tsx" --include="*.ts" -l | head -3
```

If the package.json check returns nothing, stop and tell the user: this skill expects a Remix v2 project.

## Step 3: Load Verification Protocol

Load the [review-verification-protocol](../../../beagle-core/skills/review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md) skill before any substantive judgment on code. This is the canonical cross-plugin protocol; do not substitute a framework-specific copy.

**Pass before Step 5:** The skill is loaded (or its checklist is open in context). Do not classify severity or write findings until this gate clears.

## Step 4: Load Skills

Read each applicable skill below (open its `SKILL.md`) so its guidance is in context before you review that area.

**Always load** (a non-trivial Remix v2 app exercises all six areas):

- [remix-v2-routing-review](../remix-v2-routing-review/SKILL.md)
- [remix-v2-data-flow-review](../remix-v2-data-flow-review/SKILL.md)
- [remix-v2-forms-review](../remix-v2-forms-review/SKILL.md)
- [remix-v2-error-boundaries-review](../remix-v2-error-boundaries-review/SKILL.md)
- [remix-v2-perf-ssr-review](../remix-v2-perf-ssr-review/SKILL.md)
- [remix-v2-meta-sessions-review](../remix-v2-meta-sessions-review/SKILL.md)

**Detection telemetry** (records what each area review will actually find; does not gate loading — all six skills always load, but record matches/non-matches for the final report's coverage section):

| Condition | Skill |
|-----------|-------|
| `app/routes/` present | `remix-v2-routing-review` |
| `loader` / `action` exports found | `remix-v2-data-flow-review` |
| `<Form>`, `useFetcher`, `useSubmit`, `useNavigation`, native `<form`, or manual `fetch(` found | `remix-v2-forms-review` |
| `ErrorBoundary` / `useRouteError` found | `remix-v2-error-boundaries-review` |
| `headers` export, `defer(`, or `.server.ts` / `.client.ts` files or `prefetch=`/`<PrefetchPageLinks` found | `remix-v2-perf-ssr-review` |
| `meta` export or session/cookie helpers found | `remix-v2-meta-sessions-review` |

If a detection row returns no matches, record that explicitly in the report's coverage section — the skill still loads, but the reviewer should note the area had no surface to review.

## Step 5: Review

**If the agent supports subagents** (and `--parallel` is requested or appropriate), dispatch one subagent per area in parallel; **otherwise** run the same areas sequentially in a single context. Both paths produce identical output.

Parallel path:
1. Detect all areas upfront
2. Dispatch one subagent per area, each loading its skill and reviewing its domain only
3. Wait for all subagents to return
4. Consolidate findings into a single output

Sequential path:
1. Load applicable skills
2. Review routing + nested route structure first
3. Review loader/action data flow
4. Review forms and progressive enhancement
5. Review error boundaries
6. Review meta, sessions, and headers/SSR
7. Consolidate findings

## Step 6: Verify Findings

Before reporting any issue:
1. Re-read the actual code (not just diff context)
2. For "unused" claims — did you search all references, including route-file conventions?
3. For "missing" claims — did you check parent routes, root.tsx, or framework defaults?
4. For syntax issues — did you verify against Remix v2 docs (not v1, not React Router v7)?
5. Remove findings that are style preferences, not actual issues

**Pass before promoting to Critical/Major:** For that item, (2)–(4) are satisfied with a concrete artifact — opened file at `FILE:LINE`, grep output for references, or cited parent/framework code — not only diff context.

## Step 7: Review Convergence

- **Single-pass:** report ALL issues across routing, data flow, forms, errors, SSR/perf, meta/sessions, types, and security in one pass. Before submitting, ask whether your recommended fixes would themselves trigger new findings — if yes, include those now.
- **Scope:** review only code in the diff and directly related existing code. Missing test coverage is ONE Minor issue, no implementation prescriptions. No new dependencies.
- **Fix complexity:** real severity for fixes to existing code. Requests for net-new code (new modules, dependencies, test suites, extracted abstractions) are **Informational**, not blocking.
- **Re-review:** verify previous fixes only — no new discovery, no re-flagging unfixed Minor/Nice-to-Have items.

## Output Format

```markdown
## Review Summary
[1-2 sentence overview]

## Issues

### Critical (Blocking)
1. [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
   - Issue / Why / Fix

### Major (Should Fix)
2. [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
   - Issue / Why / Fix

### Minor (Nice to Have)
N. [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
   - Issue / Why / Fix

### Informational (For Awareness)
N. [FILE:LINE] SUGGESTION_TITLE
   - Suggestion / Rationale

## Good Patterns
- [FILE:LINE] Pattern description (preserve this)

## Verdict
Ready: Yes | No | With fixes 1-N (Critical/Major only; Minor items are acceptable)
Rationale: [1-2 sentences]
```

## Post-Fix Verification

After fixes are applied, run:

```bash
npm run lint
npm run typecheck
npm run test
```

All checks must pass before approval.

## Gates

Advance in order; do not skip a **pass condition** by restating it informally.

1. **Scope recorded** — **Pass when:** You have the output of the Step 1 command (or an explicit substitute path list) naming what is in scope.
2. **Protocol + always skills loaded** — **Pass when:** [review-verification-protocol](../../../beagle-core/skills/review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md) and all six `remix-v2-*-review` skills are loaded before the first severity judgment.
3. **Conditional skills audited** — **Pass when:** For each Step 2 detection row you either confirmed a match or recorded that the command returned no results.
4. **Critical/Major evidence** — **Pass when:** Each such finding cites a `FILE:LINE` that exists in the tree and meets the Step 6 pass rule for that finding type.
5. **Single output** — **Pass when:** The Issues section uses one continuous numbering sequence and the deliverable satisfies Step 7 single-pass completeness.

## Rules

- Load skills BEFORE reviewing — not after.
- Number every issue sequentially with `FILE:LINE` and clear Issue / Why / Fix.
- This is Remix v2 — do not apply React Router v7, Remix v1, or Next.js (`"use client"`, server components) conventions.
- Run the Post-Fix Verification block after fixes; Verdict ignores Minor and Informational items.

More Code Review skills

pr-to-video

heygen-com/hyperframes

Turn a GitHub pull request (a PR URL, owner/repo#N, or 'this PR' in a checked-out repo) into a code-change explainer video — changelog, feature reveal, fix, or refactor walkthrough built from the diff, commits, and files: the input is a code change, not a website. Not a product promo (/product-launch-video) or a no-PR topic explainer (/faceless-explainer). Unclear → /hyperframes.

178.9k

receiving-code-review

obra/superpowers

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

178.0k

public-relations

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants help with public relations, earned media, press coverage, journalist outreach, or media strategy (not pull requests). Also use when the user mentions 'PR,' 'public relations,' 'press,' 'press release,' 'press coverage,' 'media outreach,' 'pitch a journalist,' 'get featured,' 'media list,' 'media kit,' 'press kit,' 'newsjacking,' 'news hijack,' 'HARO,' 'Qwoted,' 'Featured,' 'Help A Reporter,' 'reporter request,' 'tech press,' 'TechCrunch,' 'earned media,' 'thought leadership placement,' 'op-ed,' 'guest article,' 'press contacts,' 'podcast prep,' 'going on a podcast,' 'podcast guest,' 'prep me for this podcast,' or 'how do I get press.' Use this for earned media work — finding journalists, pitching stories, newsjacking, prepping podcast appearances, and responding to press requests. For startup/SaaS/AI directory submissions, see directory-submissions. For product launches, see launch. For social-media engagement, see social. For cold-email outreach to prospects, see cold-email.

33.1k

← All Code Review skills

Check your AI visibility

One URL in, a 0–100 score and the exact fixes out.

RUN THE CHECK

Browse all the tools

15 tools across six categories
13 of them never send your data anywhere

Free · No signup · No trial clock

SEE THE DIRECTORY