flag-release

Record an automated rollout for an existing LaunchDarkly flag that guards a pull request's change, so the change releases safely when the PR merges. Honors a stated release intent (release now / hold / notBefore / segment / prerequisite) and defers per-environment to the project's release policies. Use as the release step once the guarding flag exists and its code is wired. Keywords: record release, automated rollout, release policy, guarded rollout, staged rollout, simple vs policy, release intent, hold release, dark launch.

launchdarkly/ai-tooling91 installsApache-2.0Synced Aug 26

Works with

Claude CodeCursorCodex CLIGitHub CopilotGemini CLI
---
name: flag-release
description: Record an automated rollout for an existing LaunchDarkly flag that guards a pull request's change, so the change releases safely when the PR merges. Honors a stated release intent (release now / hold / notBefore / segment / prerequisite) and defers per-environment to the project's release policies. Use as the release step once the guarding flag exists and its code is wired. Keywords: record release, automated rollout, release policy, guarded rollout, staged rollout, simple vs policy, release intent, hold release, dark launch.
license: Apache-2.0
---

# Record a Flag's Automated Release

You're using a skill that takes an **existing** feature flag (created OFF) that guards a pull request's change, and records an **automated rollout** so the change releases safely once the PR merges — no human toggling a flag. It defers per-environment to the team's release policies and honors any human-stated release intent.

This is the **release step** of the PR flag workflow, and it's deliberately atomic:

| Step | Owned by |
|------|----------|
| Decide *whether* to flag | [`should-flag-change`](../should-flag-change/SKILL.md) (advisory) |
| Create the flag + wire the code | [`launchdarkly-flag-create`](../launchdarkly-flag-create/SKILL.md) |
| **Record the release** | **this skill** |

By the time this skill runs, the flag exists (OFF) and the guarding code is wired and pushed. This skill only records the rollout — it never creates flags or edits code. It can be driven directly by an automation harness, or as the final step of the [`flag-and-release-change`](../flag-and-release-change/SKILL.md) orchestrator.

**The deploy is not the release.** The merge ships the control path (flag OFF); the *release* is the flag operation this rollout performs afterward, governed by the environment's policy.

> **Honoring a hold is the one thing you must get right.** There is no "hold" release type, and **`policy` is NOT a manual gate.** On merge, `policy` *automatically* performs the environment's release (immediate, progressive, or guarded) with **no human promotion step** — a guarded rollout still *starts on its own* the moment the PR merges. So recording a held environment as `policy` does **not** hold it; it releases it on merge, before any `notBefore` date. The only way to hold an environment is to **omit it from the `environments` array entirely**, which leaves the flag OFF there. If the user wants an environment held (or not released until a date), exclude it from the call and report it as held. When in doubt, omit.

## Prerequisites

- The remotely hosted LaunchDarkly MCP server.
- The guarding flag already exists in LaunchDarkly, created OFF, with the agreed key/tags.
- A pull-request reference (`repoFullName` + `prNumber`, or `prUrl`) so the rollout binds to the right merge.

**MCP tools this skill uses:**
- `create-automated-rollout-config` — record the rollout for the flag against the PR *(the deliverable)*
- `match-release-policies` — resolve which release policy governs each environment (call before proposing the plan)
- `list-release-policies` — see the project's release policies and the metrics they auto-attach
- `get-flag` — confirm the flag exists and is OFF before recording

Full release model — `simple` vs `policy`, precedence, previewing, prerequisites, metric adequacy: [references/auto-release.md](references/auto-release.md).

## Plan Phase

**Record nothing in this phase.**

1. **Confirm the flag.** `get-flag` to verify the guarding flag exists and is OFF. If it doesn't exist yet, stop — creation is [`launchdarkly-flag-create`](../launchdarkly-flag-create/SKILL.md)'s job, and recording a rollout for a missing flag fails confusingly.
2. **Pick the target environments.** Use the environments named by the user or harness. Don't hardcode a set — a given change can't always release to every environment. If none are named, enumerate the project's real keys and confirm the set rather than assuming.
3. **Preview each environment's policy.** Call `match-release-policies` (by `flagKey` + `environmentKey`) to resolve, deterministically, what a `policy` release will do per environment — `winningReleaseMethod` (immediate / progressive / guarded / none). Don't reason about policy scope by hand. For a **guarded** winner, check the auto-attached metrics can actually compare this change (see the metric-adequacy note in [references/auto-release.md](references/auto-release.md)).
4. **Capture the human's release intent.** Ask (briefly, only if not already stated): release **on merge**, **hold** (recorded but not released yet), or wait until a **`notBefore`** date? A **cohort/segment** to target first? A **prerequisite** parent flag this must not precede? Intent sits above the policy in precedence and is **honored or explicitly held — never silently dropped**.
5. **Present the per-environment plan and stop.** For each environment, state either the `releaseType` it will be recorded with (`simple` / `policy`, and what that does on merge) **or** that it will be **held** — omitted from the recorded config so the flag stays OFF there — with the reason. Wait for confirmation; revise on feedback.

## Implement Phase

Only after confirmation:

1. **Sort every target environment into exactly one bucket — RELEASE or HOLD.** Do this *before* you build the call. There is no third bucket, and `releaseType` does not create one.

   | Bucket | Meaning | What goes in the call |
   |--------|---------|-----------------------|
   | **RELEASE** | Goes live on merge — now, or per its policy | Add `{ environmentKey, releaseType }` to the `environments` array |
   | **HOLD** | Not yet — waiting on a date, sign-off, segment, or parent flag | **Nothing.** Leave it out of `environments` entirely; name it as held in your report |

   `releaseType` (`simple` vs `policy`) only chooses *how* a RELEASE environment goes live — it never holds one. **Both release on merge:** `simple` serves `true` immediately; `policy` runs that environment's policy (immediate / progressive / guarded) automatically, with no human promotion step. "`policy` defers to the *policy*" — not to you, and not until a date. **Do not reach for `policy` to park a held environment: it ships that environment on merge, before any `notBefore`.** The only encoding of a hold is *absence from the array*.

2. **Build `environments` from the RELEASE bucket only — then read the keys back.** The array must contain every RELEASE environment and no HOLD environment. Before you send the call, scan the `environmentKey`s in the array: if any environment you're holding appears there, delete that entry. The call has **no field for a date or a hold** — if you catch yourself wanting to add `holdUntil`, `notBefore`, or `hold` to an entry (or to keep it as `policy` "so it waits"), that is the signal the environment is HOLD: **drop the entry, don't invent a field.** The date and reason go in your report, not the call.

   Worked example — *"release staging on merge, hold production until 2026-09-01"*: staging is RELEASE, production is HOLD.

   ```json
   {
     "projectKey": "default",
     "flagKey": "new-checkout-flow",
     "environments": [{ "environmentKey": "staging", "releaseType": "simple" }],
     "repoFullName": "acme/storefront",
     "prNumber": 482
   }
   ```

   `production` appears nowhere in the call. You report it held until 2026-09-01, with the reason (legal sign-off). Fail closed: if an environment's intent is unclear, it's HOLD, not RELEASE.

3. **Record the rollout.** Call `create-automated-rollout-config` with `projectKey`, `flagKey`, the RELEASE-only `environments` array, and the PR reference. If a **prerequisite** parent flag was agreed, wire it if the MCP surface supports it; otherwise report it as a manual step. Details: [references/auto-release.md](references/auto-release.md).
4. **Verify.** The call returns `created`, `config_id`, and the normalized per-environment plan — record `config_id`. Report only what you verified; flag anything you couldn't confirm rather than asserting it.
5. **Report** the per-environment release plan + `config_id`; what was **held** (and why) versus what releases on merge; and what happens on merge (e.g. "production resolves policy X → guarded rollout on merge; staging serves true immediately; production held until 2026-08-01 per intent").

## Edge Cases

| Situation | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| Flag doesn't exist yet | Stop — creation is `launchdarkly-flag-create`. Recording a rollout for a missing flag fails confusingly. |
| A rollout config already exists for this flag + PR | Don't record a second one — a duplicate confuses the scheduler. Point the user at the existing config to change the plan. |
| Registering before the PR exists | `simple` envs work without a PR, but `policy` envs need `repoFullName`/`prNumber` to trigger on merge. Prefer recording *after* the PR is open; if you record early, say `policy` won't fire until the PR is wired. |
| No release policy matches an env | `policy` falls back to defaults (often immediate). Tell the user; offer `simple`, or point at release-policy setup. |
| User wants to hold, or set a `notBefore` date | Skip the releasing plan for those environments; report them as held with the reason. Never silently release against stated intent. |
| Change depends on a parent flag not yet live | Couple them with a prerequisite (set it if the MCP surface supports it); otherwise report the coupling as a required manual step. Don't let this flag release before its parent. |
| A `policy` env resolves to guarded but has no relevant metric | Say so — a guarded rollout with no meaningful metric guards nothing. Recommend `simple`, or point at metric setup. |

## What NOT to Do

- **Don't create the flag or edit code** — that's `launchdarkly-flag-create`. This skill only records the release.
- **Don't turn the flag on yourself, or toggle it after recording the config.** The rollout owns that; double-toggling causes audit noise and confuses the scheduler.
- **Don't skip `match-release-policies`.** Proposing `policy` without knowing what it resolves to is guessing.
- **Don't silently release against a stated hold/`notBefore`.** Honor intent or hold — never drop it.
- **Don't handle or print credentials.** Access is injected by the environment.

## References

- [references/auto-release.md](references/auto-release.md): the automated-rollout / release-policy model, `simple` vs `policy`, precedence (intent → override → policy → default), previewing, prerequisites, metric adequacy. *(Core of this skill.)*
- [`launchdarkly-guarded-rollout`](../launchdarkly-guarded-rollout/SKILL.md): for a *bespoke* rollout no policy expresses — set that env to `simple` here and drive the guarded rollout by hand after merge.

More Code Review skills

pr-to-video

heygen-com/hyperframes

Turn a GitHub pull request (a PR URL, owner/repo#N, or 'this PR' in a checked-out repo) into a code-change explainer video — changelog, feature reveal, fix, or refactor walkthrough built from the diff, commits, and files: the input is a code change, not a website. Not a product promo (/product-launch-video) or a no-PR topic explainer (/faceless-explainer). Unclear → /hyperframes.

178.9k

receiving-code-review

obra/superpowers

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

178.0k

public-relations

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants help with public relations, earned media, press coverage, journalist outreach, or media strategy (not pull requests). Also use when the user mentions 'PR,' 'public relations,' 'press,' 'press release,' 'press coverage,' 'media outreach,' 'pitch a journalist,' 'get featured,' 'media list,' 'media kit,' 'press kit,' 'newsjacking,' 'news hijack,' 'HARO,' 'Qwoted,' 'Featured,' 'Help A Reporter,' 'reporter request,' 'tech press,' 'TechCrunch,' 'earned media,' 'thought leadership placement,' 'op-ed,' 'guest article,' 'press contacts,' 'podcast prep,' 'going on a podcast,' 'podcast guest,' 'prep me for this podcast,' or 'how do I get press.' Use this for earned media work — finding journalists, pitching stories, newsjacking, prepping podcast appearances, and responding to press requests. For startup/SaaS/AI directory submissions, see directory-submissions. For product launches, see launch. For social-media engagement, see social. For cold-email outreach to prospects, see cold-email.

33.1k

← All Code Review skills

Check your AI visibility

One URL in, a 0–100 score and the exact fixes out.

RUN THE CHECK

Browse all the tools

15 tools across six categories
13 of them never send your data anywhere

Free · No signup · No trial clock

SEE THE DIRECTORY