do-execute-qa-bugfix

Recebe o caminho de um arquivo de bug em qa-bugs/ (ex: qa-bugs/bug-01-alta-formulario.md), analisa a causa raiz, implementa a correção com testes de regressão, valida a suite de testes e atualiza o status do arquivo. Use quando o usuário pedir para corrigir um bug específico encontrado no QA. Não use para correções em lote — invoque uma vez por bug. Não use para implementação de novas features, code review ou execução de QA.

fabio-barboza/development-orchestrator50 installsMITSynced Aug 27

Works with

Claude CodeCursorCodex CLIGitHub CopilotGemini CLI
---
name: do-execute-qa-bugfix
description: Recebe o caminho de um arquivo de bug em qa-bugs/ (ex: qa-bugs/bug-01-alta-formulario.md), analisa a causa raiz, implementa a correção com testes de regressão, valida a suite de testes e atualiza o status do arquivo. Use quando o usuário pedir para corrigir um bug específico encontrado no QA. Não use para correções em lote — invoque uma vez por bug. Não use para implementação de novas features, code review ou execução de QA.
license: MIT
---

# Bug Fix Execution

## Role
You are a senior software engineer specialized in root-cause analysis and implementing robust, regression-tested bug fixes.

## Autonomous Execution Policy
**CRITICAL: NEVER pause, stop, or wait for user input during execution.** Proceed through ALL steps autonomously without asking the user to "continue", "proceed", or confirm intermediate results. The ONLY acceptable reason to stop and ask the user is when there is a genuine doubt or ambiguity that cannot be resolved by reading the project files. Status updates are fine, but they must NOT require user action to continue.

## Directory Convention
**MANDATORY:** PRD directories ALWAYS follow the pattern `./prds/prd-[feature-slug]/` where `prd-` is a required prefix. Example: feature `user-auth` → directory `./prds/prd-user-auth/`. **NEVER** reference a path like `./prds/user-auth/`.

## Invocation
This skill fixes **one bug at a time**. The user must provide the path to the specific bug file to fix:
```
do-execute-qa-bugfix ./prds/prd-[feature-slug]/qa-bugs/bug-[XX]-[severidade]-[slug].md
```
If no file path is provided, list all `aberto` bug files in `qa-bugs/` and ask the user which one to fix.

## Procedures

**Step 0: Detect AI Tool Environment**
Before anything else, determine the execution environment:
1. Check for `.claude/` directory in the project root → **Claude Code**
2. Check for `.github/copilot-instructions.md` or `.github/` directory → **GitHub Copilot**
3. Check for `.cursor/rules/` or `.cursor/mcp.json` → **Cursor AI**
4. Check for `opencode.json`, `.opencode/` directory, or `AGENTS.md` → **Opencode**
5. Resolve available tools based on environment:
   - **TaskUpdate**: available in Claude Code; in Copilot, Cursor, and Opencode, skip gracefully
   - **Context7 MCP**: available if configured; fallback to Web Search otherwise

Skill assets/references are loaded via your AI tool's native skill resolver — do not hard-code paths. Store the detected tool and capability flags internally.

**Step 1: Context Analysis (Mandatory)**
1. Read the bug file provided by the user. If the file does not exist, halt and report.
2. If `status` in the frontmatter is `corrigido`, halt: "Bug já corrigido — nada a fazer."
3. Extract: ID, severidade, descrição, passos para reproduzir, resultado esperado/atual, componente afetado.
4. Read the PRD at `./prds/prd-[feature-slug]/prd.md` to understand affected requirements.
5. Read the Tech Spec at `./prds/prd-[feature-slug]/techspec.md` for technical context.
6. Read the project configuration file (CLAUDE.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, or .cursor/rules/project.mdc) for project conventions.

**Step 2: Plan Fix (INTERNAL — do NOT output as standalone message)**
1. Identify affected files and determine root cause from the bug description.
2. Define fix strategy. Use Context7 MCP to verify documentation of involved libraries if needed.
3. **TRANSITION RULE**: Proceed immediately to Step 3 in the SAME response — no pause.

**Step 3: Implement Fix (starts immediately after Step 2 — no pause, no confirmation)**
1. Detect package manager from lock files (`bun.lockb` → bun, `pnpm-lock.yaml` → pnpm, `package-lock.json` → npm, default: `npm`).
2. Locate and read the affected code completely.
3. Implement the root-cause fix — no superficial workarounds.
4. If a `typecheck` script exists in `package.json`, run it after the fix.
5. **Iteration limit**: Maximum 3 fix-and-test cycles. If the bug persists after 3 cycles, mark as `não-resolvido` and document the blocker.

**Edit Failure Recovery**: When an `Edit` tool call fails: (1) `read_file` to get current content, retry with exact string. (2) Try a smaller, more unique `old_string`. (3) After 3 failed attempts, switch to `Write`. **HARD LIMIT: max 3 Edit retries per change.**

**Step 4: Create Regression Test (Mandatory)**
1. Read `references/regression-test-patterns.md` for patterns and naming conventions.
2. Create a test that:
   - Simulates the original bug scenario (must fail when the fix is reverted).
   - Validates the correct behavior with the fix applied.
   - Covers at least one related edge case.
3. Choose test type based on bug nature (unit / integration / E2E) as described in the reference.

**Step 5: MCP Validation (Mandatory when applicable)**
1. Execute the MCP discovery procedure at `do-shared/references/do-mcp-discovery-instructions.md`.
2. For bugs affecting the **UI** (and `browser-testing` MCP available): run `mkdir -p ./prds/prd-[feature-slug]/qa-screenshots` via Bash, then navigate, reproduce the fix flow, and capture screenshot evidence using `filename: prds/prd-[feature-slug]/qa-screenshots/fix-[BUG-XX]-[slug].png`.
3. For bugs affecting **backend** (and backend-capable MCP available): validate end-to-end via MCP tools.
4. If no relevant MCP available: document the validation gap in the bug file's `## Resolução` section (Step 7), rely on unit/integration tests only.

**Step 6: Final Test Execution (Mandatory Gate)**
1. Run ALL project tests using the detected package manager (e.g., `npm test`).
2. If a `typecheck` script exists, run it.
3. Verify ALL pass. The fix is NOT complete if any test fails.

**Step 7: Update Bug File (Mandatory)**
1. Update the bug file's frontmatter `status`:
   - Fixed: `corrigido`
   - Blocked: `não-resolvido`
2. Append a `## Resolução` section (if fixed) with: correção aplicada and testes de regressão criados.
3. Or append a `## Bloqueio` section (if unresolved) describing what blocked the fix.

**Step 8: Report Results (Mandatory)**
1. If `TaskUpdate` is available, mark internal tasks as `completed`.
2. **Compliance check**: call `read_file` on the bug file to confirm `status` was updated.
3. Inform the user: bug fixed (or blocked), tests passing, and which regression test was created.
4. If other `aberto` bugs remain in `qa-bugs/`, list them so the user can invoke the skill again for the next one.

## Output Language
Todos os artefatos gerados (atualizações no arquivo de bug, seções de resolução/bloqueio) devem ser escritos em Português do Brasil (PT-BR). Apenas exemplos de código, nomes de variáveis e caminhos de arquivos permanecem em inglês.

## Error Handling
- If no file path is provided, list all `aberto` bug files in `qa-bugs/` and ask the user which one to fix.
- If the bug file does not exist, halt and report.
- If status is already `corrigido`, halt: nothing to do.
- If a bug requires significant architectural changes, document the justification before proceeding.
- If new bugs are discovered during the fix, create a new bug file in `qa-bugs/` with status `novo` — do NOT fix in this cycle.
- If an MCP is unavailable, follow its "Se indisponivel" handling from the registry and document the gap.
- If implementation fails mid-way, revert broken partial changes, ensure the codebase compiles, and report the blocker.

## References
- Bug file (input): `./prds/prd-[feature-slug]/qa-bugs/bug-[XX]-[severidade-completa]-[slug].md`
- Regression test patterns: `do-execute-qa-bugfix/references/regression-test-patterns.md`
- MCP Discovery: `do-shared/references/do-mcp-discovery-instructions.md`
- MCP Registry: `do-shared/references/do-mcp-capabilities.md`
- PRD: `./prds/prd-[feature-slug]/prd.md`
- TechSpec: `./prds/prd-[feature-slug]/techspec.md`
- Screenshots: `./prds/prd-[feature-slug]/qa-screenshots/`

More Code Review skills

pr-to-video

heygen-com/hyperframes

Turn a GitHub pull request (a PR URL, owner/repo#N, or 'this PR' in a checked-out repo) into a code-change explainer video — changelog, feature reveal, fix, or refactor walkthrough built from the diff, commits, and files: the input is a code change, not a website. Not a product promo (/product-launch-video) or a no-PR topic explainer (/faceless-explainer). Unclear → /hyperframes.

178.9k

receiving-code-review

obra/superpowers

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

178.0k

public-relations

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

When the user wants help with public relations, earned media, press coverage, journalist outreach, or media strategy (not pull requests). Also use when the user mentions 'PR,' 'public relations,' 'press,' 'press release,' 'press coverage,' 'media outreach,' 'pitch a journalist,' 'get featured,' 'media list,' 'media kit,' 'press kit,' 'newsjacking,' 'news hijack,' 'HARO,' 'Qwoted,' 'Featured,' 'Help A Reporter,' 'reporter request,' 'tech press,' 'TechCrunch,' 'earned media,' 'thought leadership placement,' 'op-ed,' 'guest article,' 'press contacts,' 'podcast prep,' 'going on a podcast,' 'podcast guest,' 'prep me for this podcast,' or 'how do I get press.' Use this for earned media work — finding journalists, pitching stories, newsjacking, prepping podcast appearances, and responding to press requests. For startup/SaaS/AI directory submissions, see directory-submissions. For product launches, see launch. For social-media engagement, see social. For cold-email outreach to prospects, see cold-email.

33.1k

← All Code Review skills

Check your AI visibility

One URL in, a 0–100 score and the exact fixes out.

RUN THE CHECK

Browse all the tools

15 tools across six categories
13 of them never send your data anywhere

Free · No signup · No trial clock

SEE THE DIRECTORY