codex-issue-coordinator
Coordinates a large batch of GitHub issues through separate Codex worker threads, tested pull requests, review loops, and gated merges. Use when the user asks one Codex thread to manage several coding sessions or complete a parent issue, milestone, or issue batch.
Works with
---
name: codex-issue-coordinator
description: Coordinates a large batch of GitHub issues through separate Codex worker threads, tested pull requests, review loops, and gated merges. Use when the user asks one Codex thread to manage several coding sessions or complete a parent issue, milestone, or issue batch.
license: MIT
---
# Codex issue coordinator
Use one Codex thread to coordinate a GitHub issue batch. Give each active issue
its own worker thread, worktree, branch, and pull request. Workers hold
implementation context. GitHub holds dependency state.
Explicitly naming `/codex-issue-coordinator`, or explicitly telling the
coordinator that agents may merge, authorizes in-scope workers to merge their
own pull requests after every merge gate below passes. An implicit skill match
does not grant merge authority: run in no-merge mode unless the user's words
grant it.
Neither mode authorizes deployment, release publication, destructive
operations, branch-protection bypasses, or changes outside the supplied batch.
## Preconditions
1. Read the repository instructions, parent issue, native sub-issues, declared
dependencies, project board, issue state, and linked open or merged pull
requests. A merged pull request is only evidence of completion when it
closes or explicitly references the issue and its final change and proof
satisfy the issue scope. Reconcile that issue and project state instead of
dispatching it again. Do not infer completion from a link alone.
2. Use Codex thread tools. If visible Codex threads and Codex-managed worktrees
are unavailable, stop. Do not replace workers with hidden subagents.
3. Make every issue a complete task before dispatch. If a missing product or
technical decision could change behavior, data, security, compatibility,
operations, cost, or proof, mark that issue as needing human input.
4. Build a dependency graph. Treat GitHub as the durable source of issue, pull
request, review, and merge state. Stop for human correction if the graph
contains a dependency cycle. Do not create a second local tracker.
5. Default to two active workers. Use another limit only when the user asks or
the repository gives a stricter limit.
## Coordinator workflow
1. Keep the calling thread as coordinator. Name it `#<parent> Coordinator` when
the batch has a parent issue. Use `set_thread_pinned` to pin it at the start
of every new or resumed coordinator run, before inspecting or dispatching
workers.
2. Reuse an existing active worker for the same issue. Inspect an unclear or
interrupted worker before creating another. If the issue already has an
open pull request, create or resume its worker on that pull request's exact
head branch and include the branch and pull request URL in its prompt.
Otherwise create a Codex project thread in a managed worktree from the
latest remote default branch and include the required new branch name.
3. Name every worker `#<issue-number> <short title>`.
4. Start only issues whose prerequisites are merged. Independent issues may
run together up to the worker limit. Do not stack dependent branches in
this workflow.
5. Give the worker the full issue URL, dependency state, repository location,
resolved branch and pull request state, and the worker contract below. Tell
it to use `/task-to-pr` and pass the coordinator's explicit merge or
no-merge mode. Merge mode grants authority only for that worker's issue.
6. Monitor workers with compact `wait_threads` snapshots. Use `read_thread`
only when a worker needs help. Send decisions or corrected scope back with
`send_message_to_thread`; do not edit the worker's files from the
coordinator.
7. Continue independent work when one issue is blocked. After three failed
attempts at the same check or review finding, pause that issue, record the
evidence on GitHub, and request human input.
8. In merge mode, when a worker reports completion, verify GitHub says the pull
request is merged, the issue contains final proof, and the issue is closed.
Close it explicitly if the merged pull request did not close it. Then mark
the issue Done when the project supports it and archive the worker thread.
In no-merge mode, stop that worker after its pull request passes all
agent-completable gates, leave the issue in Review, record any pending human
approval or merge as its blocker, and leave the thread available.
9. Refresh the dependency graph after every merge and dispatch newly ready
issues from the updated remote default branch. In no-merge mode, when a
dependent issue is waiting only for a passing prerequisite pull request to
be merged, record that human-merge dependency as its blocker. Do not wait
indefinitely or dispatch the dependent from an unmerged branch.
10. In merge mode, finish only when every in-scope issue is merged, closed, and
Done when the project supports that state, or every unfinished issue has a
recorded blocker that needs human action. In no-merge mode, finish when
every in-scope issue has a ready pull request with all agent-completable
gates passing or a recorded human blocker.
## Worker contract
Each worker owns one issue and follows this order:
1. Read the issue, repository instructions, relevant design, code, tests, and
dependency pull requests. Move the issue to In Progress when possible.
2. Use the Codex-managed worktree. If the issue has an open pull request, reuse
its exact head branch and pull request. Otherwise create the repository's
required issue-linked branch from the updated default branch.
3. Implement only the issue. Add or update tests for every acceptance
criterion, affected failure path, regression risk, and named edge case.
4. Use `/test`. Browser-facing work requires a real browser check of the
affected success and failure flows, responsive widths, keyboard behavior,
console errors, and failed requests when relevant.
5. Commit and push the tested change. Open a draft pull request if one is not
already open. Include a short summary and current proof.
6. Mark the pull request ready for review and move the issue to Review. Do this
before requesting independent review or waiting for GitHub review.
7. Use `/review` with a fresh subagent that did not implement the change. Wait
for required CI and automated review. In merge mode, also wait for every
repository-required approval. In no-merge mode, do not wait indefinitely
for human feedback; record a pending required approval as a human blocker.
8. Address every valid in-scope finding. Reply to review threads with the fix
or evidence for making no change. Resolve a thread only when it is fully
addressed.
9. After any code change, repeat affected `/test` proof and fresh `/review`,
commit and push, update the pull request evidence, and wait for CI and
automated review again. Iterate until the mode's gates pass; do not
manufacture extra rounds or wait indefinitely for optional human feedback.
10. In merge mode, merge the pull request using the repository's preferred
method after every merge gate passes. Never use an admin bypass. Wait until
GitHub reports the pull request as merged, record final proof, and verify
the issue is closed. Close it explicitly if the pull request did not. In
no-merge mode, leave the passing pull request open for a human to merge.
Report the final state to the coordinator.
## Merge gates
A worker may merge only when all of these are true:
- The pull request is ready for review, not draft.
- The complete issue scope and acceptance criteria have recorded proof.
- Focused and required wider tests pass on the final commit.
- A fresh `/review` verdict is `Approve` on the final code.
- Every required GitHub check passes.
- Every actionable automated or human review thread is resolved.
- Every repository-required approval is present.
- The pull request is mergeable and current with its required base.
- No security, data-loss, compatibility, operational, or product decision is
unresolved.
- The pull request changes only the worker's issue.
If a gate cannot pass, do not merge. Record the blocker and continue other
independent work.
## Worker prompt
Use this shape and replace every placeholder:
```text
Use /task-to-pr to complete <issue URL> in this Codex-managed worktree.
Your thread owns only this issue, branch, worktree, and pull request.
Branch state: <reuse PR head branch and PR URL, or create new branch name>.
Delivery mode: <merge after all gates pass, or leave the passing PR open>.
Read the issue and repository instructions as the source of truth.
Implement the smallest complete change and prove acceptance criteria, edge
cases, failure paths, and regressions.
After local proof passes, commit, push, open or update the pull request, and
mark it ready for review. Only then run fresh independent /review and wait for
CI and GitHub review. Address valid findings and repeat test and review after
every code change.
<If merge mode: The user explicitly authorized this /codex-issue-coordinator run to
merge this issue's pull request after every merge gate passes. Wait until
GitHub reports the merge, update and close the issue, and return the result.>
<If no-merge mode: Leave the passing pull request open for human merge and
return its URL and proof.>
Do not deploy, publish a release, bypass repository rules, or change unrelated
work.
```
## Return
For each issue, report its worker, pull request, gate state, and blocker. State
which issues are complete and which need human action. Do not repeat worker
logs that do not change the result.
## Boundaries
- Use visible Codex threads for workers. Fresh subagents are only for the
independent `/review` inside a worker.
- Never dispatch two workers for one issue or let two workers share a worktree.
- Never replace or duplicate an existing pull request for the issue. Resume it.
- Reconcile already-merged pull requests and closed issues before dispatch,
but only after their change and proof satisfy the issue scope.
- Never start dependent work from an unmerged pull request in this workflow.
- Never merge an unrelated pull request merely because it blocks the batch.
- Never infer deployment or release authority from merge authority.
- Do not archive a worker until its merge and final issue state are verified.More Code Review skills
pr-to-video
heygen-com/hyperframes
Turn a GitHub pull request (a PR URL, owner/repo#N, or 'this PR' in a checked-out repo) into a code-change explainer video — changelog, feature reveal, fix, or refactor walkthrough built from the diff, commits, and files: the input is a code change, not a website. Not a product promo (/product-launch-video) or a no-PR topic explainer (/faceless-explainer). Unclear → /hyperframes.
receiving-code-review
obra/superpowers
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
public-relations
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants help with public relations, earned media, press coverage, journalist outreach, or media strategy (not pull requests). Also use when the user mentions 'PR,' 'public relations,' 'press,' 'press release,' 'press coverage,' 'media outreach,' 'pitch a journalist,' 'get featured,' 'media list,' 'media kit,' 'press kit,' 'newsjacking,' 'news hijack,' 'HARO,' 'Qwoted,' 'Featured,' 'Help A Reporter,' 'reporter request,' 'tech press,' 'TechCrunch,' 'earned media,' 'thought leadership placement,' 'op-ed,' 'guest article,' 'press contacts,' 'podcast prep,' 'going on a podcast,' 'podcast guest,' 'prep me for this podcast,' or 'how do I get press.' Use this for earned media work — finding journalists, pitching stories, newsjacking, prepping podcast appearances, and responding to press requests. For startup/SaaS/AI directory submissions, see directory-submissions. For product launches, see launch. For social-media engagement, see social. For cold-email outreach to prospects, see cold-email.

