epc-search
RAG search across EPC provisions, EPO Guidelines for Examination, and PCT rules for European and international patent law research
Works with
Claude CodeCursorCodex CLIGitHub CopilotGemini CLI
---
name: epc-search
description: RAG search across EPC provisions, EPO Guidelines for Examination, and PCT rules for European and international patent law research
license: MIT
---
# EPC/PCT Legal Search Skill
Hybrid RAG search across the European Patent Convention (EPC), EPO Guidelines for Examination, and PCT Rules for patent law research.
## When to Use
Invoke this skill when users ask to:
- Find EPC articles or rules on a specific topic
- Search EPO Guidelines for Examination
- Look up PCT rules or Administrative Instructions
- Compare EPC requirements with USPTO/MPEP practice
- Research EPO Board of Appeal case law principles
- Understand European patent prosecution procedure
- Find legal basis for EPO examination objections
## What This Skill Does
Provides legal research across European and international patent law:
1. **EPC Search** (European Patent Convention):
- Articles 1-178 EPC
- Rules 1-167 EPC (Implementing Regulations)
- Protocol on Interpretation of Art. 69 EPC
- Protocol on Centralisation
- Protocol on Privileges and Immunities
2. **EPO Guidelines Search** (Guidelines for Examination):
- Part A: Guidelines for Formalities Examination
- Part B: Guidelines for Search
- Part C: Guidelines for Procedural Aspects of Substantive Examination
- Part D: Guidelines for Opposition and Limitation/Revocation
- Part E: Guidelines for General Procedural Matters
- Part F: Guidelines for Substantive Examination (The Patent Application)
- Part G: Guidelines for Patentability
- Part H: Guidelines for Amendments and Corrections
3. **PCT Rules Search** (Patent Cooperation Treaty):
- PCT Articles 1-69
- PCT Rules 1-96 (Regulations under the PCT)
- Administrative Instructions under the PCT
- WIPO Standards (ST.25, ST.26, ST.36)
4. **Cross-Jurisdiction Comparison**:
- EPC vs 35 USC mapping
- EPO Guidelines vs MPEP equivalents
- PCT requirements vs national requirements
## Required Data
**MCP Tools Available**:
- `search_patent_law` - Search EPC, EPO Guidelines, PCT rules with jurisdiction parameter
- `search_mpep` - Search MPEP/35 USC/37 CFR for comparison
## How to Use
When this skill is invoked:
1. **Determine jurisdiction**:
- EPO: search EPC articles/rules and EPO Guidelines
- PCT: search PCT articles/rules and Administrative Instructions
- Both: search across all sources
- Comparison: search EPO + USPTO sources
2. **Execute search**:
**EPC/EPO Guidelines search**:
```python
results = search_patent_law(
query="claim clarity requirements",
jurisdiction="EPO",
top_k=5
)
```
**PCT rules search**:
```python
results = search_patent_law(
query="unity of invention",
jurisdiction="PCT",
top_k=5
)
```
**Cross-jurisdiction comparison**:
```python
epo_results = search_patent_law(query="sufficiency of disclosure", jurisdiction="EPO")
us_results = search_mpep(query="enablement requirement")
```
3. **Present results**:
- Show relevant provisions with full text
- Provide article/rule numbers and section references
- Include EPO Guidelines commentary
- Note practical implications for prosecution
## Key EPC Provisions Reference
### Patentability
| Article | Topic | Description |
|---------|-------|-------------|
| Art. 52 | Patentable inventions | What can be patented |
| Art. 52(2) | Exclusions | Discoveries, theories, programs "as such" |
| Art. 53 | Exceptions | Morality, plant/animal varieties, medical methods |
| Art. 54 | Novelty | Absolute novelty, no grace period |
| Art. 55 | Non-prejudicial disclosures | 6-month grace for abuse or exhibitions |
| Art. 56 | Inventive step | Problem-solution approach |
| Art. 57 | Industrial applicability | Capable of industrial application |
### The Patent Application
| Article/Rule | Topic | Description |
|-------------|-------|-------------|
| Art. 78 | Requirements | What an EP application must contain |
| Art. 83 | Disclosure | Sufficiency of disclosure |
| Art. 84 | Claims | Clarity, conciseness, support |
| Rule 42 | Description | Content and form of description |
| Rule 43 | Claims | Two-part form, numbering, categories |
| Rule 46 | Drawings | Form and content requirements |
| Rule 47 | Abstract | Max 150 words, figure designation |
### Examination Procedure
| Article | Topic | Description |
|---------|-------|-------------|
| Art. 90 | Formalities examination | Initial formality check |
| Art. 92 | European search | Search report |
| Art. 94 | Substantive examination | Examination on request |
| Art. 97 | Grant/refusal | Decision on application |
| Art. 99 | Opposition | 9-month opposition period |
## Key PCT Rules Reference
### Application Requirements
| Rule | Topic | Description |
|------|-------|-------------|
| Rule 4 | The request | Form PCT/RO/101 contents |
| Rule 5 | The description | Required sections and order |
| Rule 6 | The claims | Numbering, form, categories |
| Rule 8 | The abstract | Max 150 words, figure |
| Rule 11 | Physical requirements | Paper, margins, fonts |
| Rule 12 | Language | Accepted languages |
### Unity and Search
| Rule | Topic | Description |
|------|-------|-------------|
| Rule 13 | Unity of invention | Single general inventive concept |
| Rule 33 | Relevant prior art | ISA search scope |
| Rule 39 | Subject matter not searched | Excluded from ISA search |
| Rule 43bis | International search report | Written opinion of ISA |
### National Phase
| Rule | Topic | Description |
|------|-------|-------------|
| Rule 49 | Physical requirements | National phase format |
| Rule 49.6 | Translation | Language requirements |
| Rule 51bis | Certain national requirements | National law compliance |
## EPO Guidelines Structure
```
Part A: Formalities Examination
├── Chapter I: Checking the application on filing
├── Chapter II: Filing and examination for formalities
├── Chapter III: Special cases (divisionals, PCT)
└── Chapter IV: Designation of inventor
Part F: The Patent Application
├── Chapter I: Description
├── Chapter II: Claims (MOST COMMONLY SEARCHED)
│ ├── F-IV, 2: Independent claims
│ ├── F-IV, 3: Two-part form
│ ├── F-IV, 4: Clarity
│ ├── F-IV, 6: Support by description
│ └── F-IV, 7: Dependent claims
├── Chapter III: Sufficiency of disclosure
├── Chapter V: Abstract
└── Chapter VI: Drawings
Part G: Patentability
├── Chapter I: Excluded subject matter
├── Chapter II: Non-technical subject matter
├── Chapter III: Novelty
├── Chapter V: Non-prejudicial disclosures
├── Chapter VI: Inventive step (problem-solution)
└── Chapter VII: Inventive step (combinability)
```
## Presentation Format
Present search results as:
```
EPC/EPO LEGAL RESEARCH RESULTS
=================================
Query: "claim clarity requirements"
Jurisdiction: EPO (EPC + Guidelines)
[1] Art. 84 EPC - The Claims
"The claims shall define the matter for which protection
is sought. They shall be clear, concise and be supported
by the description."
EPO Guidelines F-IV, 4 - Clarity
"Each claim should be read giving the words the meaning
and scope which they normally have in the relevant art..."
Key Points:
- Claims must be clear on their own (not by reference to spec)
- Technical terms given their normal meaning in the art
- Relative terms need objective reference point
- Functional features must be verifiable
[2] Rule 43(1) EPC - Form and content of claims
"...shall contain: (a) a statement indicating the designation
of the subject-matter and those technical features necessary
for the definition... (preamble); and (b) a characterising
portion preceded by 'characterised in that'..."
EPO Guidelines F-IV, 3.2 - Two-part form
"Independent claims should normally be in the two-part form..."
---
Related MPEP Comparison:
- MPEP 2173: Claims Must Particularly Point Out and Distinctly Claim
- 35 USC 112(b): Equivalent US clarity requirement
- Key difference: EPO applies stricter objective clarity standard
```
## Cross-Jurisdiction Mapping
| EPO (EPC) | USPTO (35 USC) | PCT |
|-----------|----------------|-----|
| Art. 54 (Novelty) | 35 USC 102 | Art. 33(2) |
| Art. 56 (Inventive step) | 35 USC 103 | Art. 33(3) |
| Art. 83 (Sufficiency) | 35 USC 112(a) Enablement | Rule 5.1(a)(v) |
| Art. 84 (Clarity) | 35 USC 112(b) | Rule 6.1 |
| Art. 84 (Support) | 35 USC 112(a) Written desc. | Rule 6.1 |
| Rule 42 (Description) | MPEP 608 | Rule 5 |
| Rule 43 (Claims) | 37 CFR 1.75 | Rule 6 |
| Rule 47 (Abstract) | 37 CFR 1.72 | Rule 8 |
| Art. 52(2) (Exclusions) | 35 USC 101 | N/A |
| Art. 53(c) (Medical methods) | N/A (allowed in US) | N/A |
## Tools Available
- **Read**: To load legal documents
- **Bash**: To run legal search queries
- **Write**: To save research results and legal memorandaMore AI & ML skills
writing-shape
mattpocock/skills
Writing, exploit: shape raw material into an article, paragraph by paragraph.
275.5k
writing-fragments
mattpocock/skills
Writing, explore: mine raw fragments, no structure yet.
275.3k
full-output-enforcement
leonxlnx/taste-skill
Overrides default LLM truncation behavior. Enforces complete code generation, bans placeholder patterns, and handles token-limit splits cleanly. Apply to any task requiring exhaustive, unabridged output.
273.1k

