legal-compliance-mapping
Cross-jurisdictional accessibility law reference. Maps Section 508, ADA, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act, AODA, and other frameworks to WCAG versions, additional requirements, applicable sectors, and enforcement mechanisms.
Works with
--- name: legal-compliance-mapping description: Cross-jurisdictional accessibility law reference. Maps Section 508, ADA, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act, AODA, and other frameworks to WCAG versions, additional requirements, applicable sectors, and enforcement mechanisms. license: MIT --- # Legal Compliance Mapping Skill Maps accessibility legal frameworks across jurisdictions. Used by `compliance-mapping` agent and any agent generating compliance reports. --- ## Framework Comparison | Framework | Jurisdiction | WCAG Version | Scope | Enforcement | |-----------|-------------|--------------|-------|-------------| | Section 508 (Revised) | US (Federal) | WCAG 2.0 AA | Federal agencies and their ICT | Administrative complaints, lawsuits | | ADA Title II | US (State/Local) | WCAG 2.1 AA (DOJ 2024 rule) | State and local government websites | DOJ enforcement, lawsuits | | ADA Title III | US (Private) | No explicit WCAG version; courts use 2.0/2.1 AA | Public accommodations | Private lawsuits, DOJ enforcement | | EN 301 549 v3.2.1 | EU | WCAG 2.1 AA (Chapter 9-11) | Public sector + private sector ICT | EU member state enforcement | | European Accessibility Act (EAA) | EU | WCAG 2.1 AA (via EN 301 549) | Private sector products and services (June 2025) | Market surveillance, fines | | AODA | Ontario, Canada | WCAG 2.0 AA | Ontario organizations (50+ employees) | Administrative penalties | | Accessible Canada Act | Canada (Federal) | WCAG 2.1 AA (guidance) | Federally regulated entities | CRTC/CTA enforcement, penalties | | Israeli Standard 5568 | Israel | WCAG 2.0 AA | Public websites and apps | Civil lawsuits | | JIS X 8341-3:2016 | Japan | WCAG 2.0 AA | Government websites (recommended) | No enforcement (voluntary) | | Chinese GB/T 37668-2019 | China | Based on WCAG 2.0 | Government websites | Administrative guidance | ## Additional Non-WCAG Requirements Some frameworks require more than WCAG conformance: ### EN 301 549 Additional Requirements | Chapter | Requirement | Beyond WCAG | |---------|-------------|-------------| | Chapter 5 | Closed functionality (kiosks, ATMs) | Yes — no WCAG equivalent | | Chapter 6 | Real-time text (RTT) communication | Yes — no WCAG equivalent | | Chapter 7 | Video capabilities (captions, audio description) | Extends WCAG 1.2 | | Chapter 8 | Hardware accessibility | Yes — physical product requirements | | Chapter 10 | Non-web documents | Maps WCAG to document formats | | Chapter 11 | Non-web software | Maps WCAG to native applications | | Chapter 12 | Documentation and support services | Accessible help documentation | | Chapter 13 | ICT providing relay or emergency services | Yes — no WCAG equivalent | ### European Accessibility Act Additions - Products: computers, smartphones, tablets, self-service terminals, e-readers - Services: e-commerce, banking, transport, telephony, audiovisual media - Microenterprises (<10 employees, <€2M turnover) exempt from service requirements - Deadline: June 28, 2025 for new products/services ## VPAT / ACR Mapping The Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT) maps to three standards: | VPAT Edition | Standards Covered | |-------------|-------------------| | VPAT 2.5 Section 508 | Revised Section 508 (WCAG 2.0 AA) | | VPAT 2.5 EU | EN 301 549 (WCAG 2.1 AA + Chapters 5-13) | | VPAT 2.5 INT | Section 508 + EN 301 549 + WCAG 2.x | **Conformance levels in VPAT:** - Supports — fully meets the criterion - Partially Supports — some functionality meets, some does not - Does Not Support — majority of functionality does not meet - Not Applicable — criterion is not relevant to the product ## Accessibility Statement Requirements ### W3C Model (Voluntary) - Conformance status (Fully conformant / Partially conformant / Non-conformant) - WCAG version and level targeted - Known limitations with workarounds - Assessment approach (self, external, automated tools) - Feedback mechanism with response commitment - Date of statement and last review ### EU Model (Required for Public Sector) All of the above, plus: - Disproportionate burden declaration (if applicable, with justification) - Link to national enforcement body - Annual review requirement - Date of last accessibility audit ## Compliance Timeline Quick Reference | Event | Date | Impact | |-------|------|--------| | Section 508 Refresh | January 2018 | Adopted WCAG 2.0 AA for federal ICT | | EU Web Accessibility Directive | September 2018 (new sites), September 2020 (existing) | Public sector websites and mobile apps | | ADA Title II WCAG 2.1 Rule | April 2026 (large), April 2027 (small) | State/local government web content | | European Accessibility Act | June 2025 | Private sector products and services | | AODA Full Compliance | January 2021 | Ontario organizations 50+ employees |
More Accessibility skills
ui-ux-pro-max
nextlevelbuilder/ui-ux-pro-max-skill
UI/UX design intelligence for web, mobile, and desktop. This skill should be used when designing, building, reviewing, or fixing interfaces, including pages, components, design systems, accessibility, interaction, responsive layout, typography, color, charts, and stack-specific UI implementation. Searchable local data: 79 searchable styles (50 active), 192 product palettes and reasoning profiles, 74 font pairings, 119 UX guidelines, 105 icons, 17 GSAP presets, 25 chart types, and 22 stacks.
hyperframes-core
heygen-com/hyperframes
The HyperFrames composition contract — build one renderable project. Use for composition structure, the `data-*` timing attributes, `class="clip"`, tracks, sub-compositions, variables, framework-owned media playback, deterministic-render rules, and validation. Also covers Tailwind projects and the STORYBOARD.md / SCRIPT.md plan formats. Read before writing composition HTML.
web-design-guidelines
vercel-labs/agent-skills
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".

