Verified against Claude · 2026-08-02
Turn a target keyword into a content brief anchored to the real SERP
Classifies true search intent against the actual top-10 snapshot, inventories which SERP features are genuinely present, and builds a heading outline where every H2 states the specific job it does for the reader — the strategy layer that has to happen before a draft gets written.
The prompt
Ready to copy — highlighted parts are example details you can swap.
You are a senior SEO content strategist. Your deliverable is a brief a writer can execute without a single follow-up question — not draft copy, and not a generic outline that could apply to any query in this space. TARGET KEYWORD: best accounting software for freelancers AUDIENCE: freelance designers and consultants with no bookkeeping background BUSINESS CONTEXT: we sell invoicing and tax-estimate software built specifically for solo freelancers CURRENT TOP-10 SNAPSHOT: 6 of the top 10 are comparison listicles, 1 is a tool review video with a video carousel, a featured snippet holds a definition paragraph, and People Also Ask shows "is QuickBooks worth it for freelancers" TARGET WORD COUNT: 2,200-2,600 words STEP 1 — CLASSIFY INTENT State whether best accounting software for freelancers is informational, commercial-investigation, transactional, or navigational, and justify it in one sentence grounded in what kind of page would actually satisfy the searcher — not the keyword's surface phrasing. If the snapshot shows a genuine mix of page types in the top 10, name the mix and pick the format the plurality supports rather than defaulting to whichever is easiest to write. STEP 2 — INVENTORY SERP FEATURES From the snapshot given, list which SERP features are actually present: featured snippet, People Also Ask, AI Overview, video carousel, local pack, shopping results, image pack. For each one present, state the specific format implication — a featured snippet held as a definition paragraph means the brief needs a crisp 40-60 word direct answer near the top; a comparison table winning it means the brief needs a table, not prose. If a feature is absent, say so instead of listing it out of habit. STEP 3 — BUILD THE OUTLINE Produce an H1-H3 outline that answers the query at the depth this intent and this SERP demand — not padded to hit 2,200-2,600 words, not thin because the topic looks simple. For every H2, add a bracketed note stating the specific job that section does for the reader, for example "[resolves the objection that stops the reader from converting]" or "[the comparison table this SERP's intent expects]." A section with no stated job gets cut, not kept for completeness. STEP 4 — SURFACE THE UNSTATED QUESTIONS List the sub-questions a genuinely thorough page would answer that the searcher hasn't typed but is implicitly asking, based on what the Step 1 classification implies about their situation and what stage of the decision they're at. STEP 5 — E-E-A-T CHECKLIST Name the specific experience, credentials, first-hand data, or original example that would make this page read as more trustworthy than a rewrite of the current top 10 — not a generic "add expert quotes" line, but the actual kind of proof this exact topic and audience would find credible. STEP 6 — DIFFERENTIATION ANGLE Given we sell invoicing and tax-estimate software built specifically for solo freelancers, name one angle the current top-ranking pages are structurally unlikely to include, and explain the specific reason this business is positioned to include it honestly rather than as a claimed advantage with nothing behind it. OUTPUT FORMAT A structured brief with the six sections above as clear headers, not flowing prose. Close with a word-count allocation per H2 so a writer knows roughly how much space each section earns, and it should sum to something close to 2,200-2,600 words.
Customize
Optional — swap in your own details for the highlighted parts above.
Why this works
Classifying intent against an actual SERP snapshot rather than the keyword's wording alone catches the single most common briefing mistake: a query that reads as informational ("how much does X cost") can still be dominated by commercial-investigation pages in practice, because searchers asking that question are shopping, not studying — a brief built from the keyword's grammar instead of the SERP's evidence sends a writer toward the wrong format before a sentence is written. Requiring a bracketed "job" note on every H2 forces the outline to justify each section's existence individually rather than accept a template structure by default, which is what actually prevents the two failure modes a content brief is supposed to guard against: padding a thin topic to hit a word count, and skipping real depth on a topic that looks simple but isn't. The unstated-questions step and the E-E-A-T checklist both target the same underlying signal Google's Quality Rater Guidelines describe explicitly — pages that demonstrate first-hand experience and answer the searcher's next question before they ask it are rated as more satisfying than ones that stop at the literal query, and a brief that only restates the keyword never surfaces that layer on its own. Finally, tying the differentiation angle to the stated business context rather than asking for a generic "unique value prop" keeps the model from inventing a competitive advantage with nothing behind it — it can only name an angle the business is actually positioned to back up, which is what separates real differentiation from marketing filler dressed up as strategy.
What you get back
Intent: Commercial-investigation — despite the informational phrasing, 6 of 10 ranking pages are comparison listicles built to move a reader toward a purchase decision, not a single explainer. SERP features: featured snippet (definition paragraph — needs a 50-word direct-answer block up top); People Also Ask includes "is QuickBooks worth it for freelancers" — dedicate an H2 to it, don't bury it in a table cell. H2: What freelancers actually need that generic accounting software misses [sets evaluation criteria before naming tools] H2: Top picks by business stage [addresses "which one for me," the real decision point] H2: Pricing side-by-side [SERP feature match — this is what a comparison-page reader screenshots] Unstated question: "What happens to my data if I switch tools next year?" Differentiation: your product's built-in quarterly tax estimate is something a general-purpose tool like QuickBooks doesn't do natively — a claim your own product page can back up, unlike a reviewer with no freelance tax exposure.
Verified against
Claude Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-08-02
ChatGPT GPT-5.1 · 2026-07-25
Changelog
- 2026-07-25 — Initial publish, verified against ChatGPT.
- 2026-08-02 — Re-verified against Claude Sonnet 5; added the bracketed per-H2 job requirement after a draft outline padded a thin topic to hit the word-count target instead of flagging that the target was too high for the intent.
Building this for real?
This is a free starting point. If you'd rather have SEO built and running for your business, that's Scult's day job.
EXPLORE SEO
