Verified against ChatGPT · 2026-08-14
Script how to respond when a prospect asks for a discount you don't want to give
Writes the exact response to a specific discount request, holding the price while offering something that costs you less than the discount would, instead of a generic 'how to handle price objections' explainer.
The prompt
Ready to copy — highlighted parts are example details you can swap.
A prospect just asked for a discount and I need to respond well on the call or in the follow-up email, not read a general explainer on handling price objections. THE ACTUAL REQUEST They asked for 20% off, saying budget was approved for less than our quoted price. WHERE THIS DEAL STANDS Verbally committed to us already, just need to get the number to work; deal is otherwise ready to sign this week. WHAT I CAN OFFER INSTEAD OF A STRAIGHT DISCOUNT Can throw in the premium support tier free for year one, worth roughly what a 10% discount would cost us. HOW MUCH ROOM I ACTUALLY HAVE, IF ANY I have about 5% of real room if it comes to that, but I'd rather not lead with it. WHAT NOT TO DO Do not open by justifying the price with a list of features — that answers a question the prospect didn't ask and reads as defensive. Do not say 'let me see what I can do' as a placeholder; if there's real flexibility, name the specific thing on the table, and if there isn't, say so plainly rather than implying movement that isn't coming. Do not offer a discount and a value-add in the same breath as if they're a package — the value-add is the alternative to the discount, not an addition on top of it, and blurring that undercuts the whole point of holding price. WRITE ME THE RESPONSE Write it in the voice I'd actually use, in whichever format (A follow-up email after the call.) I need it in, opening by acknowledging the request directly without defensiveness, then moving to the alternative value lever framed as what I can actually do, and only naming a real discount number if I've told you I have room to give one. Close with a specific next step, not an open-ended 'let me know what you think.'
Customize
Optional — swap in your own details for the highlighted parts above.
Why this works
The instruction against opening with a feature-justification list corrects a very common default pattern: when a model is given a price objection and asked to help respond, it tends toward defending the price's worth first, because that's the most obvious surface-level interpretation of 'they think it costs too much' — but a prospect who explicitly asked for a discount already accepts the value proposition and is negotiating terms, not asking to be resold, so a features-first response answers the wrong question and reads as not having listened. Banning 'let me see what I can do' as a placeholder targets a specific weak habit in sales language: it's filler that sounds like movement without committing to anything, and prospects recognize it as such, which either invites them to push harder for specifics or reads as evasive — forcing a concrete answer, positive or negative, is more respected than a vague non-answer either way. The rule against presenting a discount and a value-add together as a bundle protects the entire strategic point of the exercise: the alternative value lever exists specifically to avoid discounting, so if the model blends the two into one offer, it accidentally produces the outcome the prompt was trying to prevent — a full price cut with something extra piled on top, costing more than the discount alone would have. Gating any real discount number behind an explicit statement of actual flexibility prevents the model from inventing a plausible-sounding number when none was given, which matters because a fabricated discount figure delivered confidently in a drafted response could get sent to a real prospect as if it were an authorized offer.
What you get back
Thanks for being direct about the budget number — I want to find a way to make this work without just cutting the price, since I think it undersells what you're getting. What I can do is include the premium support tier free for the first year, which is worth roughly what the 20% would have cost us, and keeps the full platform intact rather than trimming anything. If that works, I can get the paperwork updated and back to you by end of day tomorrow.
Verified against
ChatGPT GPT-5.1 · 2026-08-14
Changelog
- 2026-08-14 — Initial publish, verified against ChatGPT GPT-5.1.
Need this built into your business?
If a prompt isn't enough — Google Ads management, built and maintained for you — that's Scult's day job.
EXPLORE GOOGLE ADS MANAGEMENT
