Sales & Outreach

Verified against ChatGPT · 2026-07-19

Build a MEDDIC discovery-call question script for one specific deal

Generates open-ended discovery questions mapped to each MEDDIC pillar for a named deal, with a built-in vague-answer follow-up per pillar, so the call surfaces real qualification gaps instead of generic rapport-building chat.

ChatGPTClaudeGemini7 fillable variables

The prompt

Ready to copy — highlighted parts are example details you can swap.

I have a discovery call coming up with David Okafor, Director of Customer Support at Clearline Payments, a second call, post-demo, no economic buyer identified yet deal for a help-desk platform with AI-assisted ticket routing. Here's what I already know: They mentioned support tickets doubled after a product launch; David keeps saying "we" but has never named a budget owner. Time available on the call: 30 minutes.

Build a MEDDIC-based discovery question script for this specific call — not a generic list that would work equally well for any deal. Reference They mentioned support tickets doubled after a product launch; David keeps saying "we" but has never named a budget owner wherever it's actually relevant, and don't force a reference to it into a pillar it has nothing to do with just to seem tailored.

For each MEDDIC pillar, give me 2-3 open-ended questions (no yes/no questions, and no question a prepared prospect could answer in one word) plus one embedded follow-up to use if their first answer comes back vague or deflects the question without really answering it:

- METRICS — what quantifiable outcome would make this a win for them, specific enough that you could check back against it in three months
- ECONOMIC BUYER — who actually signs off on budget, and how to ask this without sounding like you're trying to route around David Okafor or imply they don't have real authority
- DECISION CRITERIA — what they'll formally evaluate options against, distinguishing must-haves from nice-to-haves
- DECISION PROCESS — the actual steps, approvals, and realistic timeline between "interested" and a signed contract, not the timeline they'd give if asked to guess out loud
- IDENTIFY PAIN — the specific, costed pain driving urgency now, in their own operational terms, not a generic industry pain point that could apply to any company in the space
- CHAMPION — whether David Okafor actually has the internal standing and personal motivation to sell this when you're not in the room, versus simply being cooperative on a call

PRIORITIZATION
Flag which two pillars are the biggest qualification risk for this specific deal based on They mentioned support tickets doubled after a product launch; David keeps saying "we" but has never named a budget owner — not a generic "always watch Economic Buyer and Champion" answer, but a judgment grounded in what's actually known or unknown here. Then, for each of the six pillars, tell me the single highest-priority question to ask first if the call runs short on time, ordered so the most qualification-critical information comes out even if the call gets cut to half its planned length.

CALL FLOW
Sequence the pillars in an order that flows like a real conversation rather than an interrogation checklist — Identify Pain typically belongs early since it earns the right to ask harder questions later, and Economic Buyer and Decision Process typically land better once some trust and context have been established, not as the opening question.

OUTPUT FORMAT
1. Questions grouped by pillar, in the recommended call-flow order, with the vague-answer follow-up nested directly under each main question.
2. The two highest-risk pillars for this deal, with the specific reasoning from They mentioned support tickets doubled after a product launch; David keeps saying "we" but has never named a budget owner.
3. The time-constrained priority order, one question per pillar.

Customize

Optional — swap in your own details for the highlighted parts above.

Why this works

MEDDIC — Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process, Identify Pain, Champion — is a documented enterprise-sales qualification framework precisely because each pillar catches a different, independent way deals stall later, and a deal can score well on some pillars while quietly failing on others: strong pain with no confirmed economic buyer looks healthy on a call and then goes silent for a month once it hits an approval step nobody actually mapped. Forcing open-ended questions plus a built-in vague-answer follow-up mirrors how real discovery calls actually unfold rather than how a checklist imagines them going: the first answer to "how are you measuring success" is almost always too soft to qualify on — "we just want things to run smoother" — and a script with no planned follow-up leaves the rep improvising in the moment exactly when a sharper question would matter most. Sequencing the pillars to match a real conversation's natural trust curve, rather than running through MEDDIC's six letters in alphabetical or memorized order, matters because Economic Buyer and Decision Process questions asked before any rapport or pain has been established read as presumptuous or even a little suspicious — "who signs off on this" lands very differently in minute two than in minute fifteen of the same call. Asking the model to name the two riskiest pillars from the actual known_context, rather than defaulting to a generic warning about the usual suspects, is what turns a reusable checklist into deal-specific prep — a deal with a confirmed budget owner but a vague, unconfirmed pain story has a completely different risk profile than one with the reverse, and a script that doesn't distinguish the two is giving the same advice regardless of what's actually happening in this deal. Building an explicit time-constrained priority order in advance, rather than leaving triage to the moment the call runs long, protects against the single most common real-world failure of a discovery script: a call that gets cut short by ten minutes and ends with the rep having asked whatever question happened to come up next in the list, rather than the one question that would have most reduced the deal's actual qualification risk.

What you get back

ECONOMIC BUYER — "Beyond your team, who signs off when a tool like this gets approved for budget?" Follow-up if vague: "If this were approved tomorrow, whose signature would actually be on the PO?" Biggest risk pillars for this deal: Economic Buyer and Decision Process — David keeps saying "we" without naming anyone, which usually means either he doesn't know who the buyer is or hasn't asked yet. Prioritize the Economic Buyer question first if time is short.

Verified against

ChatGPT GPT-5.1 · 2026-07-19

Claude Sonnet 4.5 · 2026-07-20

Changelog

  • 2026-07-20 Initial publish, verified against ChatGPT (GPT-5.1) and Claude (Sonnet 4.5).

Need this built into your business?

If a prompt isn't enough — Google Ads management, built and maintained for you — that's Scult's day job.

EXPLORE GOOGLE ADS MANAGEMENT
All Sales & Outreach prompts

Check your AI visibility

One URL in, a 0–100 score and the exact fixes out.

RUN THE CHECK

Browse all the tools

15 tools across six categories
13 of them never send your data anywhere

Free · No signup · No trial clock

SEE THE DIRECTORY