Verified against ChatGPT · 2026-08-06
Turn a call transcript into structured CRM notes, not a wall of text
Converts raw call notes or a transcript into the specific fields a CRM opportunity record actually uses, marking anything not genuinely discussed as such instead of a confident-sounding guess, so the next person on the deal doesn't have to re-read the whole call.
The prompt
Ready to copy — highlighted parts are example details you can swap.
Here are my raw notes or transcript from a call with Tomas Reyes at Halifax Freight Systems: Tomas said their current dispatch process takes 3 hours a day of manual work, mentioned they're also looking at a competitor, said he'd need to check with his boss on budget, no firm next date set Convert this into structured CRM notes using these exact fields, in this exact order — leave a field explicitly marked "not discussed" rather than guessing or leaving it blank, since a blank field looks like an oversight while "not discussed" is an honest, useful signal to whoever reads this next: - CALL SUMMARY — two to three sentences, what actually happened on the call, not what was hoped to happen - PAIN OR USE CASE — their stated problem, in their own words wherever possible, not a paraphrase that sounds more like a product pitch than what they actually said - METRICS — any number, quota, or measurable outcome they mentioned, quoted directly if possible - ECONOMIC BUYER — a named person, or "not yet identified" if nobody specific was named - DECISION CRITERIA — what they said they'll evaluate options against, or "not discussed" if this never came up - DECISION PROCESS OR TIMELINE — the actual steps and dates mentioned, or "not discussed" if none were given - COMPETITION — named alternatives they mentioned, or "none mentioned" if the call gave no signal either way - RISKS OR OPEN QUESTIONS — anything unresolved, concerning, or contradictory from the call that the next person reading this should know about before acting on the deal - NEXT STEP — the specific committed action and date, exactly as agreed on the call — never write a next step that sounds resolved if it wasn't actually confirmed before the call ended RULES Do not infer a field from vague or adjacent language if it wasn't actually said directly — a prospect saying "we're pretty deliberate about these decisions" is not the same as stating an actual decision process, and writing it into the DECISION PROCESS field as if it were specific detail manufactures a false sense of qualification for whoever reads this next. Keep each field to one or two lines maximum; if a field needs more than that to capture what happened, that's usually a sign the raw notes need a follow-up call to actually clarify it, not a longer CRM note. Flag explicitly if NEXT STEP wasn't actually confirmed on the call, rather than writing one that reads as settled — a next step invented to make the notes look complete is worse for pipeline hygiene than an honestly blank one, because nobody will think to double-check something that already looks resolved. OUTPUT FORMAT The nine fields, in the order given, ready to paste directly into a CRM opportunity record.
Customize
Optional — swap in your own details for the highlighted parts above.
Why this works
The fixed field list mirrors the actual opportunity-record structure most CRMs use and maps directly onto MEDDIC fields many sales orgs already require reps to fill in, so the output can be pasted straight into the record rather than translated by hand from a loose narrative summary first. The "not discussed" instruction is the load-bearing rule in the entire prompt: AI-generated call summaries left unconstrained tend to smooth over genuine gaps by inferring a plausible-sounding answer from adjacent context, which quietly corrupts CRM data in a way that's much harder to catch than an obvious error — a fabricated-sounding but wrong Economic Buyer field is worse than an honestly empty one, because the next rep who opens the deal has no visible reason to double-check something that already reads as settled fact. The rule against inferring a decision process from vague language like "we're pretty deliberate about these decisions" targets a specific and common failure mode: that sentence signals a general disposition, not an actual named process with real steps, and a model asked to fill in a Decision Process field will otherwise happily convert atmosphere into apparent detail, manufacturing a false sense of qualification that the rest of the deal team then unknowingly relies on. Flagging an unconfirmed next step rather than writing a tidy, resolved-sounding one directly targets pipeline hygiene at its most common failure point, since a vague or missing next step is one of the most frequently cited reasons deals stall without anyone noticing — and a next step that's been quietly invented to make the notes look complete is actually worse than a missing one, because nobody flags a field that already looks fine for a follow-up check.
What you get back
ECONOMIC BUYER: not yet identified — Tomas said he'd "check with his boss," name not given. NEXT STEP: not confirmed — no date was set on the call; flag for follow-up to lock one in before this deal ages further.
Verified against
ChatGPT GPT-5.1 · 2026-08-06
Claude Sonnet 4.5 · 2026-08-07
Changelog
- 2026-08-07 — Initial publish, verified against ChatGPT (GPT-5.1) and Claude (Sonnet 4.5).
Need this built into your business?
If a prompt isn't enough — Google Ads management, built and maintained for you — that's Scult's day job.
EXPLORE GOOGLE ADS MANAGEMENT
