Synthesize customer interviews into jobs-to-be-done findings without averaging away the outliers

I'm giving you raw notes or transcripts from customer interviews. Synthesize them into a jobs-to-be-done analysis — but do not collapse everyone into a single average customer if the notes actually show meaningfully different segments underneath.

INTERVIEW NOTES OR TRANSCRIPTS
Notes from 8 customer interviews about why they signed up for a budgeting app, mostly focused on debt payoff but two mentioning saving for a specific goal instead.

PRODUCT OR DECISION THIS INFORMS
Deciding whether our next feature investment should be a debt-payoff planner or a savings-goal tracker.

NUMBER OF INTERVIEWS AND ANY KNOWN SEGMENT SPLIT
8 interviews total, all existing paying customers, no prior segmentation done.

Before synthesizing, check whether the interviews actually describe one coherent job-to-be-done or multiple distinct ones — if two or more interviewees describe wanting the product for clearly different underlying reasons, do not merge those into one blended "customers want X" statement, because the blended version will describe no real customer accurately. Where a genuine minority pattern shows up (even from just one or two interviews) that contradicts or sits outside the majority pattern, name it as a distinct finding rather than treating it as noise to average out — a minority pattern in qualitative research this small a sample is often a real signal, not statistical noise, precisely because the sample is too small for anything to average out cleanly in the first place. For the majority pattern(s), state the job to be done in the classic structure: when [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [expected outcome] — grounded in actual quotes or close paraphrases from the notes, not a generic restatement.

WHAT NOT TO DO
Do not present findings as percentages ("60% of customers said...") from a small qualitative sample — that language implies statistical rigor this kind of research doesn't have. Do not silently smooth a contradictory interview into agreement with the majority to make the write-up cleaner.

OUTPUT FORMAT
1. The primary job-to-be-done statement(s), with supporting quotes.
2. Any distinct minority pattern found, named explicitly as such, not folded into the majority.
3. One line on what Deciding whether our next feature investment should be a debt-payoff planner or a savings-goal tracker. this most directly informs, and what it doesn't yet tell you.