Pull every citable claim out of a page (or thread of pages) into a table with exact quotes and provenance

Extract every claim from the source(s) below that would need a citation if I used it in an internal competitive-analysis memo that will be reviewed by legal before wider distribution, and build a citation table I can paste directly into that document.

SOURCE(S) TO EXTRACT FROM
three competitor pricing pages and one analyst report PDF, all currently open

WHAT COUNTS AS CITABLE HERE
pricing figures, feature availability claims, and any stated customer counts — not general marketing language

CITATION FORMAT NEEDED
informal internal style: [Source name, page/section, access date]

EXTRACTION RULES
Go through the source(s) and pull out every claim matching pricing figures, feature availability claims, and any stated customer counts — not general marketing language — do not paraphrase a claim into your own words in the extraction itself; capture it as close to verbatim as the source states it, and mark clearly whether what you captured is a direct quote (use quotation marks exactly as in the source) or your own compressed restatement of a longer passage (mark this explicitly as "paraphrased"). For every claim, note the exact page or section it came from — not just the site name — so I can find it again without re-reading the whole source. If a claim on the page is itself attributed to another source that isn't the page in front of you (e.g. "according to a 2025 industry report..."), note that the citation trail goes one level deeper and flag it rather than citing the page you're reading as if it were the origin.

OUTPUT TABLE
Claim (quote or paraphrase, labeled) | Exact location (page/section/paragraph) | Attributed origin if different from the page itself | Formatted citation in informal internal style: [Source name, page/section, access date].

WHAT NOT TO DO
Do not invent a page number, publication date, or author name if the source doesn't actually display one — write "not stated on page" rather than guessing, since a fabricated citation detail is worse than an honest gap. Do not silently merge two similar claims from different parts of the source into one row if they're phrased differently — list them separately even if redundant, and let me decide whether to consolidate.

End with a short list of any claims you found compelling but could not locate a specific, quotable location for — these need a second look before they go in the document.