Verified against Claude · 2026-07-27
Build a month of LinkedIn content around 3-4 real pillars, not a posting schedule
Turn your expertise and a business goal into a planned content run with real format variety and a stated, checkable reason each slot exists, instead of a generic "post 3x a week" list that can't be reviewed for whether it actually worked.
The prompt
Ready to copy — highlighted parts are example details you can swap.
EXPERTISE AREA B2B pricing strategy for usage-based SaaS products BUSINESS GOAL THIS CONTENT SHOULD MOVE Get inbound consulting inquiries from mid-market SaaS founders REALISTIC POSTING FREQUENCY 3 times per week FORMATS YOU CAN ACTUALLY PRODUCE Text posts, carousels, and occasional polls — no video for now TIME HORIZON FOR THIS CALENDAR 4 weeks STEP ONE: DEFINE 3-4 REAL PILLARS Before building any calendar, define 3-4 content pillars — recurring themes within B2B pricing strategy for usage-based SaaS products that each connect to Get inbound consulting inquiries from mid-market SaaS founders in a specific, stated way. "Thought leadership" is not a pillar; "case-study breakdowns of pricing decisions we've reversed and why" is a pillar. For each one, state in one sentence exactly how it's supposed to move Get inbound consulting inquiries from mid-market SaaS founders, not just that it's related to the topic. STEP TWO: BUILD THE CALENDAR Build a calendar spanning 4 weeks at 3 times per week that: 1. ROTATES PILLARS so no two consecutive posts hit the same one — a reader following closely should see the range across a couple of weeks, not a run of three posts on the same theme back to back. 2. ROTATES FORMAT across Text posts, carousels, and occasional polls — no video for now — do not schedule several text-only posts in a row if a carousel, poll, or document post option exists in that list; different formats earn different kinds of engagement, and a calendar that's accidentally all one format is leaving reach on the table regardless of topic quality. 3. FOR EVERY SLOT, GIVES: the date or week, the format, the pillar it belongs to, a working title or hook idea specific enough to actually write from later (not "post about pricing"), and one line on exactly what this specific post is meant to do for Get inbound consulting inquiries from mid-market SaaS founders — a reader reaction, a specific kind of inbound interest, or a piece of credibility being built for a later ask. STEP THREE: AUDIT THE BALANCE Close with a short note identifying which pillar is currently underused relative to how important it actually is to Get inbound consulting inquiries from mid-market SaaS founders — not just which pillar has the fewest slots, but which underused pillar's absence is actually costing something, versus a pillar that's fine with fewer posts because it's doing a smaller job. CONSTRAINT Do not invent a pillar outside B2B pricing strategy for usage-based SaaS products just to add variety — a calendar with a pillar the author can't actually speak to with real specificity produces posts that read as generic the moment they're written, regardless of how well the calendar slot was planned. OUTPUT The pillar list with its one-sentence "how this moves the goal" statement, then the full calendar table, then the balance audit note.
Customize
Optional — swap in your own details for the highlighted parts above.
Why this works
A calendar that's just a cadence with no argument behind each slot produces a month of posts that don't add up to anything measurable in retrospect — a quarter later, nobody can say which specific posts moved {{business_goal}} versus which were just cadence-filling, because nothing about the plan connected an individual post to a specific intended effect at the time it was scheduled. Tying every slot to both a pillar and a one-line stated reason it serves the business goal is what makes the calendar reviewable rather than just executable. A calendar can be checked afterward against reality — did the pricing-pillar posts actually generate the kind of inbound they were meant to? — only if each slot made a specific, falsifiable claim about its own purpose up front, rather than a vague "builds thought leadership" applied uniformly to every entry. Forcing format rotation in addition to topic rotation matters because LinkedIn's different native formats reach and convert attention differently. Carousels and document posts tend to earn more cumulative dwell time through repeated swipes, polls generate fast low-effort interaction that surfaces the post to more feeds, and plain text relies entirely on the opening hook with no structural assist — so a calendar that's accidentally uniform in format is really running one content strategy five different times while looking like five different strategies. The constraint against inventing a pillar outside genuine expertise protects the calendar's own success criteria. A pillar chosen for variety rather than depth produces posts the author can't actually write with real specifics, and a content calendar's entire value collapses if executing it just produces generic posts on schedule — a thin pillar with no real material behind it costs more in credibility than the topical variety was worth.
Verified against
Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-07-27
ChatGPT GPT-5.1 · 2026-07-28
Changelog
- 2026-07-28 — Initial publish for the rewritten linkedin category, verified against Claude (Sonnet 5) and ChatGPT (GPT-5.1).
Need this built into your business?
If a prompt isn't enough — Google Ads management, built and maintained for you — that's Scult's day job.
EXPLORE GOOGLE ADS MANAGEMENT
