Design a LinkedIn poll that reveals a real signal, not just clicks

Topic or question I'm considering polling on: Whether teams should require a written doc before any feature kickoff.
Who I'm polling: Product managers and engineering leads following me.
What I actually want to learn from the results: Whether "written doc first" is still the norm or if teams have moved on.

LinkedIn polls allow 2-4 answer options, each limited to 30 characters, and run for a duration you set (from 1 day up to 2 weeks). Give me:

1. Three poll question variants on this topic, each with 2-4 options that create genuine tension — meaning a reasonably informed audience member could plausibly land on more than one option, not a poll where 90%+ will obviously pick the same answer
2. For each variant, one sentence on what a specific result split (e.g., "if it comes back 70/30 toward option A") would actually tell me, distinct from what a different split would tell me
3. A flag on any variant that's really just engagement bait dressed as a poll — one with an obvious "correct" answer, or where every option restates the same underlying opinion — and a rewritten version if so

Keep option text literal and specific — no option should require a qualifier or "it depends" to make sense as a real answer.