Verified against ChatGPT · 2026-07-25
Rewrite your LinkedIn headline to work everywhere it actually appears
Produce a full-length, compact, and structurally alternate headline — each independently authored for the specific rendering context it will appear in, from the full profile view down to the truncated space beside a comment or inside a search result row.
The prompt
Ready to copy — highlighted parts are example details you can swap.
CURRENT TITLE OR HEADLINE Senior Product Designer at a Series B startup WHO YOU HELP B2B SaaS teams shipping their first enterprise-grade UI SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROOF POINT Led the redesign that cut onboarding drop-off by a third SEARCH KEYWORDS product design, design systems, B2B SaaS, UX research WHERE THIS HEADLINE GETS SEEN MOST OFTEN Mostly in search results right now — I'm actively job hunting WHERE THIS HEADLINE ACTUALLY GETS SEEN The headline field has a 220-character hard limit at full length, but it renders in several compact contexts that truncate far shorter: beside every comment you leave on someone else's post, in the connection-request preview a stranger sees before accepting, in notification emails, and in every row of a search-result list. A headline written only to look good under your name on the full profile is optimized for the context it's actually seen in least. DELIVER THREE VERSIONS 1. FULL-LENGTH (180-220 characters) — combine role, who you help, and the specific outcome or proof point from Led the redesign that cut onboarding drop-off by a third, working in product design, design systems, B2B SaaS, UX research naturally rather than as a keyword-stuffed fragment. This is the version shown on the full profile view. 2. COMPACT (under 80 characters) — keep only the single highest-value phrase: the one thing that should survive if everything else gets cut by a narrow rendering context. This is not a shortened version of the full-length one; decide independently what the one thing is that matters most if only one thing gets through. 3. ALTERNATE FULL-LENGTH — a second full-length version taking a genuinely different structural approach from version 1: if version 1 leads with the title, lead this one with the outcome; if version 1 is a single flowing phrase, structure this one with a pipe-separated list of role, audience, and proof point. CHARACTER DISCIPLINE For each version, state the exact character count and confirm it fits its stated budget. Do not estimate — count. LANGUAGE DISCIPLINE Cut generic filler entirely: "passionate," "results-driven," "thought leader," "dynamic," "innovative." Every remaining word should be doing either search work (a term someone would actually type) or comprehension work (telling a stranger something specific and true) — nothing should be there purely for tone. PRIORITY WEIGHTING If Mostly in search results right now — I'm actively job hunting indicates this headline is seen mostly in one specific context — mostly in search because of active job hunting, or mostly beside comments because of frequent posting — say which of the three versions should actually be set as the live headline given that, rather than defaulting to the full-length one as the "main" version by convention. OUTPUT The three versions labeled full-length, compact, and alternate, each with its character count, followed by one line on which of the three you'd actually set as the primary headline and why, given B2B SaaS teams shipping their first enterprise-grade UI, product design, design systems, B2B SaaS, UX research, and Mostly in search results right now — I'm actively job hunting.
Customize
Optional — swap in your own details for the highlighted parts above.
Why this works
The headline is the single most-repeated piece of text a profile owner controls on LinkedIn — it appears beside every comment left on any post, in every connection-request preview, in reaction and mention notifications, and in every row of a search result. Most of these renderings truncate well before the 220-character limit on mobile specifically, so a headline tuned only for the full-profile view is tuned for its lowest-frequency appearance, not its highest. That's the direct reason this asks for an independently authored compact version rather than a truncated slice of the full-length one. The phrase that matters most in a one-time full read isn't necessarily the phrase that matters most when only 60-80 characters render, so a compact version has to be authored with that specific constraint in mind, not derived mechanically by cutting the long version down. LinkedIn's People Search weights headline text heavily for keyword matching, arguably more than any other single profile field, which is why front-loading {{keywords_for_search}} into real, comprehensible phrasing — rather than burying searchable terms after a string of adjectives — changes actual discoverability, not just how polished the headline reads to someone who already found the profile another way. Requiring an exact character count rather than an estimate matters mechanically: headline character limits are enforced hard by LinkedIn's own field validation, and a version that "feels" close to 220 characters but is actually 235 will get silently truncated at save time, which defeats the entire point of hand-crafting a full-length version if the count was never actually verified. Weighting the recommendation by where the headline is seen most often, rather than always defaulting to the full-length version as the canonical one, matches the fact that "primary" is context-dependent, not a fixed property of the longest version.
What you get back
Full: "Senior Product Designer helping B2B SaaS teams ship enterprise-grade UI | Design systems, UX research | Cut onboarding drop-off 33% at [Company]" (149 chars) Compact: "Product Designer — B2B SaaS onboarding & design systems" (58 chars) Alternate: "Cut onboarding drop-off 33% by redesigning it from scratch | Senior Product Designer | Design systems + UX research for B2B SaaS" (133 chars) Recommendation: since headline_rendering_priority indicates active job search, lead with the Alternate — recruiters scanning search results respond faster to the outcome than the title.
Verified against
ChatGPT GPT-5.1 · 2026-07-25
Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-07-26
Changelog
- 2026-07-26 — Initial publish for the rewritten linkedin category, verified against ChatGPT (GPT-5.1) and Claude (Sonnet 5).
Need this built into your business?
If a prompt isn't enough — Google Ads management, built and maintained for you — that's Scult's day job.
EXPLORE GOOGLE ADS MANAGEMENT
