Verified against ChatGPT · 2026-08-10
Translate a dense legal document into plain English without losing what actually matters
Rewrites a legal document section by section into plain language a general reader can follow, preserving every substantive obligation and condition rather than just simplifying the vocabulary.
The prompt
Ready to copy — highlighted parts are example details you can swap.
Translate the legal text below into plain English for someone who has no legal training. The goal is comprehension, not legal accuracy review — you're a translator here, not a reviewer.
LEGAL TEXT
A residential lease agreement's default and remedies clause.
WHO'S READING THIS
First-time renter, no prior lease experience, English is not their first language.
WHY THEY NEED TO UNDERSTAND IT
Deciding whether to sign before a move-in deadline this week.
TRANSLATION RULES
Go section by section rather than producing one blended summary — the reader should be able to find the plain-English version of any specific part they're confused about. For each section, preserve every obligation, condition, deadline, and exception exactly — simplify the sentence structure and vocabulary, not the substance. If a sentence has three conditions attached to it, the plain-English version needs all three conditions, just stated more clearly, not the most important one. When a legal term of art appears (e.g., "indemnify," "force majeure," "joint and several liability"), define it briefly the first time it appears in the terms this document actually uses it, since generic dictionary definitions sometimes miss how a specific document scopes the term. Where a sentence is genuinely ambiguous in the original — where two readings are both plausible — say so explicitly rather than picking one reading and presenting it as the only one; papering over real ambiguity with confident plain English is worse than leaving it visibly unresolved.
WHAT NOT TO DO
Do not add commentary on whether a term is fair, favorable, or standard — that's evaluation, not translation. Do not drop a qualifying phrase ("except where," "unless," "subject to") for readability; qualifiers carry the actual legal effect and a plain-English version that drops them is not a translation, it's a misrepresentation.
OUTPUT FORMAT
Section-by-section: original section heading, then a plain-English paragraph, then a short "Key terms used here" list if any term-of-art definitions applied. End with a closing note stating plainly that this is a plain-language translation to aid understanding, not a legal interpretation or advice, and that the reader should have a qualified lawyer confirm their understanding before relying on this translation for any decision, especially around obligations, deadlines, or liability.Customize
Optional — swap in your own details for the highlighted parts above.
Why this works
The largest failure mode in plain-English legal translation isn't vocabulary, it's silent loss of qualifiers — a model asked to "simplify" a sentence will very naturally drop the "unless," "except where," or "subject to" clause because those words make a sentence harder to read, and yet those exact words are where the legal effect actually lives; explicitly instructing GPT-5.1 to preserve every condition and exception while only simplifying structure and vocabulary directly targets this failure rather than trusting a general "make it simpler" instruction to somehow preserve substance on its own. Going section by section instead of producing one blended summary matters for a document the reader will need to return to later — a reader confused about paragraph 4 of the original needs to be able to find paragraph 4's plain-English counterpart, not hunt through a merged narrative that reorganized the document's own structure. The instruction to flag genuine ambiguity rather than resolve it addresses a specific overconfidence pattern: language models asked to explain a legal sentence will often pick the more common or more sensible-sounding of two plausible readings and present it as settled, which is actively worse than leaving the ambiguity visible, because the reader now believes something is certain that a lawyer might read the opposite way. Separating translation from evaluation (no commentary on fairness) keeps the tool doing one job well instead of quietly sliding into legal opinion territory, which is what makes the closing disclaimer an accurate description of what was actually produced rather than a formality attached to something that already reads as advice.
What you get back
Section 14 — Default and Remedies. Plain English: If you don't pay rent by the date it's due, and you still haven't paid after receiving a written notice giving you 3 days to catch up, the landlord can start the legal process to end your lease early — but only after giving you that 3-day notice first. Key terms: 'notice to cure' means the landlord has to formally warn you and give you a chance to fix the problem before taking further action. This is a plain-language translation, not legal advice — confirm your understanding with a lawyer before making any decision based on it.
Verified against
ChatGPT GPT-5.1 · 2026-08-10
Changelog
- 2026-08-10 — Initial publish, verified against ChatGPT GPT-5.1.
Need this built into your business?
If a prompt isn't enough — what Scult builds, built and maintained for you — that's Scult's day job.
EXPLORE WHAT SCULT BUILDS
