Verified against ChatGPT · 2026-08-12
Translate an informed consent form into plain language without softening what's actually being consented to
Rewrites a dense informed consent document into plain language a patient can genuinely understand before signing, preserving every risk and obligation at full strength, framed explicitly as a draft requiring legal and clinical sign-off before use.
The prompt
Ready to copy — highlighted parts are example details you can swap.
You are rewriting an informed consent form into plain language so a patient can genuinely understand what they are agreeing to before signing — not summarizing it in a way that makes it easier to skim past.
ORIGINAL CONSENT FORM TEXT
Dense legal-clinical text describing a minor outpatient surgical procedure, listing risks including infection, bleeding, and a rare but serious anesthesia complication, plus an alternatives section describing a non-surgical option.
PROCEDURE OR TREATMENT THIS COVERS
Outpatient hernia repair surgery under general anesthesia.
WHO WILL BE SIGNING
Adult patients of varying reading levels and English proficiency, signing the morning of the procedure.
TARGET READING LEVEL
Sixth to eighth-grade reading level.
RULES
Rewrite each section (what the procedure involves, risks, alternatives, right to withdraw consent) in plain language, translating legal and clinical terms on first use, but preserve every specific risk, obligation, and right listed in the original exactly — a plain-language version that drops a risk because it was hard to phrase simply is worse than the dense original, since the whole point of consent is that nothing material gets lost. Do not soften the severity of any listed risk in the rewrite — if the original says a risk is "rare but serious," the plain version must convey both that it's rare and that it's serious, not just one or the other. Keep the structure of what the patient is actually agreeing to fully intact: what they're consenting to, what risks and alternatives they were told about, and their right to ask questions or withdraw consent, since a consent form that reads easily but reorganizes or trims these elements changes what it legally and ethically represents. Where the original text is ambiguous about what exactly is being authorized, do not resolve the ambiguity yourself in the plain-language version — flag it as a section that needs clarification from whoever drafted the original, since guessing at scope of consent is not a plain-language task.
WHAT NOT TO DO
Do not add reassuring language not present in the original ("this is a very safe procedure") and do not remove or shorten the alternatives section, even if it's the least-read part of the original document — alternatives are a core part of informed consent, not filler.
MANDATORY DISCLAIMER
Add a note to whoever requested this rewrite stating that this is a readability pass only, that it has not been reviewed for legal or clinical accuracy, and that a qualified clinician and, where applicable, legal or compliance counsel must review and approve the plain-language version against the original before it is used with any real patient for actual consent.
OUTPUT FORMAT
1. The rewritten plain-language consent form, section by section matching the original's structure.
2. A flagged-ambiguity list, if any.
3. The internal disclaimer note to the requester.Customize
Optional — swap in your own details for the highlighted parts above.
Why this works
Informed consent forms are a genuinely high-stakes readability task because the entire ethical and legal purpose of the document is that the patient actually understood what they agreed to — a plain-language rewrite that quietly drops a risk, trims the alternatives section, or softens "rare but serious" into just "rare" doesn't just read more smoothly, it changes what informed consent was actually obtained for, which is why the rule requires every risk, obligation, and right to be preserved at full strength rather than trading completeness for readability. The specific instruction to preserve both halves of a qualified risk statement (rare, and separately, serious) exists because simplification pressure naturally collapses two-part hedges into one, and a model optimizing purely for plain phrasing will tend to keep whichever half reads more smoothly and drop the other, silently changing the risk disclosure. Requiring the alternatives section to stay fully intact, even flagging it as often the least-read part of the original, addresses a known pattern in consent-form drafting where alternatives get compressed first because they feel secondary — but they're a required element of informed consent precisely because a patient can't meaningfully consent to one option without knowing what the others were. The instruction to flag rather than resolve ambiguity about the actual scope of what's being authorized matters because a plain-language rewrite is not the place to make a substantive legal or clinical decision about what a vague original clause covers — that has to go back to whoever drafted it. The mandatory disclaimer to the requester, not the patient, reflects that this is a draft in a compliance pipeline: a rewritten consent form must be checked against the original by both clinical and legal review before it can be used to obtain actual consent from a real patient.
What you get back
Rewritten: "This surgery repairs the weak spot in your abdominal wall (hernia) using general anesthesia, which means you'll be fully asleep. Risks include infection and bleeding, which happen sometimes. There's also a rare but serious risk related to the anesthesia itself. An alternative to surgery is a non-surgical option using a supportive belt, which doesn't fix the hernia but may reduce discomfort for some patients — your doctor can explain whether that's a reasonable choice for you." Internal note: readability pass only, not yet reviewed for legal or clinical accuracy — clinical and compliance sign-off required before patient use.
Verified against
ChatGPT GPT-5.1 · 2026-08-12
Changelog
- 2026-08-12 — Initial publish, verified against ChatGPT GPT-5.1.
Need this built into your business?
If a prompt isn't enough — what Scult builds, built and maintained for you — that's Scult's day job.
EXPLORE WHAT SCULT BUILDS
