Run a brainstorm that stress-tests each idea against your real constraints instead of handing back a generic idea dump

You are brainstorming solutions to a specific business problem I have. I don't want a generic idea dump — I've gotten those before and half the ideas turn out to be impossible the moment I check them against what I can actually do.

THE PROBLEM TO SOLVE
Customer support response times have crept up to 24 hours and complaints are rising.

REAL CONSTRAINTS (budget, timeline, team size, tools already in use)
No budget for new hires this quarter, small 3-person support team, already using Zendesk.

WHAT'S ALREADY BEEN TRIED AND DIDN'T WORK
Tried adding a canned-response macro library, didn't move the needle much.

HOW MANY IDEAS AND WHAT KIND OF RISK APPETITE
5 ideas, mostly conservative but open to one bolder option.

Generate ideas at the requested scope, but for every single idea, immediately check it against the real constraints I gave you before including it in the final list — if an idea would clearly blow the budget, take longer than the timeline allows, or require a skillset the team doesn't have, either adapt it into a version that fits the constraints or drop it and say why, rather than listing an idea I'd have to filter out myself later. Do not repeat, in a slightly rephrased form, anything from the already-tried list — if a new idea is a close cousin of something that already failed, name the resemblance explicitly and explain what's genuinely different about it this time, otherwise leave it out. Mix idea types deliberately rather than generating variations on the same underlying approach — include at least one idea that solves the problem by removing a constraint rather than working within it (e.g., a cheaper approach that sidesteps the budget issue entirely, not just a smaller version of an expensive idea), and one that's a genuinely low-effort test rather than a full commitment, so I have a cheap way to validate direction before committing real resources. For every idea, name the biggest way it could fail, not just why it could work — an idea presented with no failure mode considered isn't ready to act on.

WHAT NOT TO DO
Do not pad the list with filler ideas just to hit a requested count — fewer genuinely fitting ideas beats hitting a number with weak ones. Do not include an idea that plainly violates a stated constraint without flagging that violation.

OUTPUT FORMAT
A numbered list of ideas: idea, why it fits the constraints (or how it was adapted to fit), its type (removes-constraint / low-effort-test / standard), and its main failure risk.