Ads & Campaigns

Verified against ChatGPT · 2026-08-10

Draft a landing page brief and copy that survives being read for 6 seconds, not being admired

Produces a full landing page copy draft (headline through CTA) built around one measurable conversion action, plus a section-by-section rationale for why each element earns its place instead of just filling a template slot.

ChatGPT (GPT-5.1)5 fillable variables

The prompt

Ready to copy — highlighted parts are example details you can swap.

You are writing landing page copy for a page whose entire job is to get the visitor to complete ONE specific action — not to be comprehensive, not to explain everything about the product, just to move the visitor to that one action before they leave.

TRAFFIC SOURCE
Instagram Story ad promising "see your quote in 60 seconds" for pet insurance.

SINGLE CONVERSION ACTION
Enter their pet's breed and zip code to start a quote flow.

WHAT THE VISITOR ALREADY BELIEVES WHEN THEY ARRIVE
Expects this to be fast and free, and is price-comparing against 2-3 other quote sites already open in other tabs.

OBJECTION THAT KILLS THE MOST CONVERSIONS
Fear that entering zip code triggers a flood of sales calls.

PROOF ASSETS AVAILABLE
No phone number required to see a quote; 4.6-star rating from 8,200 reviews; underwritten by a named insurer.

Write, in order: a headline (under 12 words) that matches the promise made by the traffic source rather than introducing a new angle, a one-sentence subheadline that either resolves the top objection or sets up why it doesn't apply, a 3-bullet "what you get" section using only the proof assets given, one objection-handling section addressing the stated top objection by name rather than dancing around it, and a single CTA button label plus the one sentence of microcopy beneath it. Do not add a second competing call to action anywhere on the page — no "or sign up for our newsletter" — a page selling two actions converts worse on both than a page selling one. Do not write filler sections like a generic "About Us" or feature-dump list unless a specific proof asset requires it to land; every section must exist because it does conversion work, not because landing pages conventionally have that section. Do not invent a testimonial, statistic, or guarantee not present in the proof assets list; mark any place a stronger proof point would help with "[NEEDS: proof asset]."

OUTPUT FORMAT: each section labeled, followed by a short rationale (1 sentence each) for why that specific section earns its place given the stated traffic source and top objection — not a generic best-practice justification.

Customize

Optional — swap in your own details for the highlighted parts above.

Why this works

The single-conversion-action constraint directly counters GPT-5.1's default landing-page instinct, which — absent an explicit restriction — tends to build a comprehensive page with multiple CTAs (a primary button plus a newsletter signup plus a "learn more" link) because that pattern is common in generic landing-page templates the model has seen, even though it's a well-documented conversion-rate-optimization failure mode: every additional competing action on a page measurably splits attention and lowers completion on the primary goal. Requiring the headline to match the traffic source's specific promise rather than introduce a new angle addresses message-match, one of the most consistent findings in landing-page conversion research — a visitor who clicked a specific promise and lands on a page that opens with a different framing experiences a split-second trust gap that raises bounce rate even if the new framing is arguably better copy. Naming the top objection explicitly and requiring it be addressed by name rather than danced around forces the page to do the actual conversion work instead of hoping the objection resolves itself through good vibes and social proof alone — objection-handling copy that never states the objection reads as evasive to a skeptical visitor, particularly relevant here since the stated objection (fear of being flooded with sales calls) is exactly the kind of thing a visitor is silently checking for. The requirement to flag missing proof rather than invent it protects against a specific real risk: a landing page overstating a guarantee or rating that doesn't match reality is a conversion asset that actively damages trust the moment a visitor checks it against reviews elsewhere, which is more likely for anything phrased as a specific number.

What you get back

Headline: "See Your Quote in 60 Seconds — No Phone Call Required." Rationale: matches the exact promise from the Instagram ad word-for-word and preempts the top objection (fear of sales calls) in the same sentence, so the visitor's guard drops before they even reach the form.

Verified against

ChatGPT GPT-5.1 · 2026-08-10

Changelog

  • 2026-08-10 — Initial publish, verified against ChatGPT GPT-5.1.

Need this built into your business?

If a prompt isn't enough — Google Ads management, built and maintained for you — that's Scult's day job.

EXPLORE GOOGLE ADS MANAGEMENT
All Ads & Campaigns prompts

Check your AI visibility

One URL in, a 0–100 score and the exact fixes out.

RUN THE CHECK

Browse all the tools

15 tools across six categories
13 of them never send your data anywhere

Free · No signup · No trial clock

SEE THE DIRECTORY