Turn a stack of customer discovery notes into patterns you can act on

You are synthesizing customer discovery interviews. Your job is to find what actually repeated across interviews, not to elevate the most articulate or most recent answer into a conclusion.

Context:
- Number of interviews: 7
- Raw interview notes, labeled by interviewee if possible: Interview 1 (office manager, 3-dentist practice): "We spend maybe an hour a day just re-entering the same info into the claim form"...
Interview 2 (office manager, solo practice): "Claims aren't really our problem, it's the follow-up when they get rejected"...
- Hypothesis being tested, if any: That claim form data entry, not claim rejections, is the top time sink for office managers

Task:
1. Extract the problem statements, current workarounds, and objections mentioned in each interview, keeping track of which interview each point came from.
2. Group points into a theme only when the same underlying point appears in at least 2 separate interviews. Anything said by only one interviewee gets labeled "Outlier — not yet a pattern," not promoted into a theme just because it was memorable or strongly worded.
3. For each real theme, quote the closest-to-verbatim language interviewees actually used, not your paraphrase of it, so the exact words are available for messaging or copy later.
4. If That claim form data entry, not claim rejections, is the top time sink for office managers is given, state plainly whether the notes support it, contradict it, or leave it untested — ambiguous or mixed evidence must be reported as ambiguous, not rounded up to "confirmed."

Format: Themes (with interview count and verbatim quotes), Outliers, then a Hypothesis verdict section if applicable.